No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Remarks by Sir Nigel Rodley
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
Abstract
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b61e4/b61e4703a5581cec6864f93d7b823776b672fe34" alt="Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'"
- Type
- Consular Rights and the Death Penalty After LaGrand
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2002
References
1 GA Res. 2857 (XXVI), Dec. 20, 1971, UN Gaor, 26th Sess., Supp. No. 29, at 94; also GA Res. 32/61, Dec. 8, 1977, UN Gaor, 32nd Sess., Supp. No. 45, at 136.
2 See descriptions of proceedings of the sixth and eighth quinquennial U.N. Congresses on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of offenders in Nigel S. Rodley, the Treatment of Prisoners Under International Law 208-09 (1999).
3 Soering v. United Kingdom, 161 Eur. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) (1989).
4 European Parliament Resolution of 2 April 1998 on Human Rights: Death Penalty in the United States, OJ C138/1998, at 176 (May 4, 1998); Resolution of 13 April 2000 on Human Rights: Death Penalty in the United States, OJ C040/2001, at 423 (Feb. 7, 2001); Resolution of 6 July 2000 on Human Rights: Death Penalty in the United States, OJ C121/2001, at 403 (April 24, 2001).
5 Council of European Union Doc. 9199/98.
6 Presidency Statement 5878/99 (Press 34), Feb. 11, 1999.
7 Presidency Statement 5834/00 (Press 25), Feb. 8, 2000.
8 Council of Europe press release, June 27, 2001.