Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T13:51:07.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by Eleanor M. Fox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Eleanor M. Fox
Eleanor M. Fox*
Affiliation:
New YorkUniversity School of Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Sovereign Compulsion Defense in Antitrust Litigation: New Life for the Act of State Doctrine?
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 72 , 1978 , pp. 97 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341(1943).

2 Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 410 F.Supp. 10 (S.D.N.Y. 1975), aff'd, 550 F.2d 68 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 98 S.Ct. 608 (1977).

3 Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co., 428 U.S. 579 (1976).

4 Eastern R.R. President's Conf. v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127 (1961); United Mine Workers v. Pennington, 381 U.S. 657 (1965).