Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T04:21:55.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National Tax Measures Affecting Foreign Investors Under the Discipline of International Investment Treaties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Thomas Wälde
Thomas Wälde*
Affiliation:
CEPMLP, University of Dundee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Sovereign Power to Tax
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 102 , 2008 , pp. 55 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bobbitt, Philip, The Shield of Achilles 117, 123, 145 (2002)Google Scholar.

2 Available from authoritative websites such as <www.worldbank.org/ICSID>; <www.investmentclaims.com>; <www.ita.law.uvic.ca> or <www.transnational-dispute-management.com>.

3 Cf. the jurisdictional decision based on a specific “Legal Stabilisation Agreement” with recourse to international arbitration in Duke v. Peru, February 1, 2006, ICSID Case No ARB/03/28 - a dispute primarily about application of Peruvian tax law in a post-privatisation situation’, the final award on the merits was (in May 2008) not yet available.

4 Cf. my Separate Opinion in Thunderbird v Mexico, Award of January 26, 2006; also Fraport v Philippines, ICSID Case No ARB/03/25 of 16 August 2007; Hindelang, S., The Issue of Equality in a State of Illegality, 7 J. World Investment & Trade 883 (2006)Google Scholar.

5 Feldman v. Mexico, ICSID Case ARB (AF) 99/1 of 16 December 2002.

6 Encana v Ecuador, LCIA award of 3 February 2006; Occidental v Ecuador, LCIA Case No UN 3467 of 1 July 2004. While these two awards are based on two different Bits with Ecuador, they also apply a fundamentally different approach with each award stretching the treaty’s text to a considerable extent.

7 E.g., CMS v Argentina, ICSID Case ARB/01/8 of May 12, 2005. The award, apart from the umbrella clause element (which had no impact on the operative part of the award) was maintained in an annulment procedure.

8 Cf. Wälde, T., International Arbitration in Oil, Gas and Energy, in: Newman & Hill, The Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration 749-820 (2nd ed. 2008)Google Scholar.