Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:43:08.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Empirical Analysis of Investment Treaty Awards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Susan D. Franck*
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska Law College

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Investment Law, Dispute Resolution, and the Development Promise: Back to the Future
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 North Carolina Law Review (forthcoming), available in draft form at <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=969257>.

2 United Nations Commission on Trade and Development, The Entry into Force of Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs), IIA Monitor No. 3 (2006), at <http://www.UNCTAD.org/en/docs/webiteiia20069_en.pdf>.

3 See North Carolina Law Review article for a description of the methodology.

4 It also excludes preliminary decisions and/or post-award activity by national courts and/or ad hoc committees.

5 Refer to the North Carolina Law Review article for a full discussion of the comments and attributions made in connection with the claims discussed in these remarks.

6 Priest, George L & Klein, Benjamin, The Selection of Disputes for Litigation, 13 J. Legal Stud. 1 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 See supra note 2.

8 Michael D. Goldhaber Madame La Présidente : A Woman Who Sits as President of a Major Arbitral Tribunal Is a Rare Creature. Why?, Am. Law: Focus Europe, Summer 2004, at <http://www.americanlawyer.com/focuseurope/arbitration04.html>.

9 Yves Dezalay & Bryan G. Garth, Dealing in Virtue 10 (1996).

10 Paulsson, Jan, Ethics, Elitims, Eligibility, 14 J. Int’l Arb. 13, 19 (1997)Google Scholar.