Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T07:02:55.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of the Most-Favored-Nation Clause upon the Status of Aliens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Norman Dwight Harris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Fourth Session
Information
Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its annual meeting (1907-1917) , Volume 5 , 1911 , pp. 226 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1911

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wharton, Digest of International Law, Vol, II, Se«. 148; United States Treaties and Conventions, 1776-1897, p. 24.

2 Imper. Stat., 33 Vict., cap. 14.

3 2 Wharton, 495.

4 The Second International Conference at the Hague — to discuss important matters relating to Private International Law. Germany, Austria, Spain, Italy, Denmark, Luxembourg, Holland, Portugal, Roumania, Russia, Sweden, Norway and Switzerland, were represented. See de Martens, Vol. 21, p 113, and following,

5 British-French treaty, 28 Feb., 1892, Art. 1; de Martens, Vol. 8, p. 659.

6 Ibid,Art. 10.

7 Ibid,Art. 10.

8 149 U. S. 698 (1893).

9 U. S. Treaties and Conventions, 1776-1887, p. 181, Art. 6.

10 u . S. Treaties and Conventions, 1776-1887, p. 183, Art. 1.

11 I b. ,Art. 2.

12 I b., Art. 3.

13 For. Eel., 1901, pp. 430-31.

14 bid,p. 451.

15 For. Rel., 1901, pp. 397-8.

16 118 U. S. 356; also Wo Lee and others.

17 For. Rel., 1901, pp. 308-9.

18 Art. 3, See. 2.

19 Message to Congress, Dec. 9, 1891.

20 “The Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad,” American Journal of International Law, July, 1910.

21 2 Wharton's Digest, p. 623.

22 For. Rel., 1907, Pt. 1, pp. 59-60.

23 Penn. St. 181, p . 525.

24 Ibid,216, p. 402.

25 213 U. S. 268.

26 U. S. Treaties and Conventions, 1776-1887, p. 587 .

27 163 U. S. 124.

28 Acts and Protocol of Second International Conference, June 25, 1894, Annex 3; de Martens, 21, p. 113.

29 Bar, Private International Law, p. 212.

30 Herstlet, Com. Treaties, 21, p. 629, Sees. 4 and 5.

31 Ibid,19, p. 813.

32 Alien Jews are subject to certain carefully prescribed restrictions in the matter of residence, holding property and transacting business in the empire.

33 de Martens, 20, p. 7.

34 Dodd, Modern Constitutions, Brazil, Art. 72; Arts. 60-61.

35 Bonfils, Droit International Public, p. 244.

36 Moore, Digest, V, p. 43, citing Commonwealth v.Newcomb, 109 Ky. 18.

37 See Chambers v.Baltimore & Ohio, 207 U. S. 141; and Ohio Laws, 95, 401, passed 1902.

38 Moore, Digest, IV, p. 2.

39 Amer. Jour, of International Law, Aprilj July and October, 1909.

40 Moore, Digest, IV, p., 2, to Mr. Wilson, Min. to Boumania,, For. Rel., 1902, p. 910.