Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:35:08.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sequential Methods to Detect Material Losses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2009

Ashim K. Mallik  and
Jaxk H. Reeves
Ashim K. Mallik
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602
Jaxk H. Reeves
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The materials-loss problem is examined under the assumption that one wishes to minimize the maximum expected amount of material diverted. A solution is obtained in the case of constant diversion under a simple sequential probability ratio test (SPRT). Extensions to the cases of correlated errors, random diversion schemes, and the Page and Shirayev-Roberts tests are examined. A thought-provoking application to the regulation of strategic special nuclear materials is given.

Type
Research Article
Information
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , October 1988 , pp. 501 - 515
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Goldman, A.S., Picard, R.R., & Shipley, J.P. (1982). Statistical methods for nuclear materials safeguards: an overview. Technometrics 24: 267–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Goldman, A.S. (1985). Sequential test procedures for detecting protracted materials losses. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-103 19 MS.Google Scholar
3.Henderson, (1986). Change-point problem with correlated observations, with an application in material accountancy. Technometrics 28: 381–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Lorden, G. (1971). Procedures for reacting to a change in distribution. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 42: 1897–1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Page, E.S. (1954). Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika 41: 100–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Robbins, H. & Seigmund, D. (1970). Boundary crossing probabilities for the Wiener process and sample sums. Annas of Mathematical Statistics 41: 1410–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Roberts, S.W. (1966). A comparison of some control chart procedures. Technometrics 8: 411–430.Google Scholar
8.Siegmund, D. (1985). Sequential analysis, tests and confidence intervals. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar