Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:33:31.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimal Allocation of Machines to Distinguishable Repairmen in Order to Maximize Some Reward Functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2009

Esther Frostig
Esther Frostig
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel, 31905
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider N unreliable machines that are maintained by M repairmen. The time until failure of machine i, and its repair by repairman j, are exponentially distributed random variable with parameters λi, and μj, respectively. All failure times and repair times are independent. Machine i earns ci, per unit time, while it is working. We wish to maximize the expected total discounted reward. It is shown that when the following conditions are satisfied — c1 ≥ … ≥ cN and c1/λ1≥…≥cN/λN, the policy that assigns the fastest repairman to the machine with the lowest index is optimal. Moreover, it is shown that when the second condition is replaced by λ≤ … ≤λN, then this policy maximizes, stochastically, the number of the most reliable machines at every time t.

Type
Research Article
Information
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , October 1995 , pp. 633 - 645
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Chang, S.C., Chao, X., Pinedo, M. & Weber, R. (1992). On the optimality of LEPT and cμ rules for machines in parallel. Journal of Applied Probability 29: 667–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Derman, C., Liberman, G.J. & Ross, S.M. (1980). On the optimal assignment of servers and a repairman. Journal of Applied Probability 17: 577–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Frostig, E. (1993). Optimal policies for machine repairman problems. Journal of Applied Probability 30: 703–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Kamae, T., Krengel, U. & O'brein, G.L. (1977). The stochastic inequalities on partially ordered spaces. The Annals of Applied Probability 5(6): 899–912.Google Scholar
5.Katehakis, M.N. & Derman, C. (1984). Optimal repair allocation in a series system. Mathematics of Operations Research 9: 615–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Katehakis, M.N. & Melolidakis, C. (1988). Dynamic repair allocation for a k-out-of-N system maintained by distinguishable repairmen. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 2: 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Massey, W.A. (1987). Stochastic ordering for Markov processes on partially ordered spaces. Mathematics of Operations Research 12: 350–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Menich, R. & Serfozo, R.F. (1991). Optimality of routing and servicing in dependent parallel processing systems. Queueing Systems 9: 419–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Nash, P. & Weber, R.R. (1982). Dominant strategies in stochastic allocation and scheduling problems. In Dempster, M.A.H. (ed.), Deterministic and stochastic scheduling. D. Reidel, pp. 343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Righter, R. (1993). Optimal control of finite source single server queue. Reprint.Google Scholar
11.Ross, S.M. (1970). Applied probability models with optimization applications. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
12.Smith, D.R. (1978). Optimal repair of a series system. Operations Research 26: 653–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Stoyan, D. (1983). Comparison methods for queues and other stochastic models. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar