Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:29:02.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On inactivity times of failed components of coherent system under double monitoring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2021

Zhouxia Guo Open the ORCID record for Zhouxia Guo [Opens in a new window] ,
Jiandong Zhang Open the ORCID record for Jiandong Zhang [Opens in a new window]  and
Rongfang Yan Open the ORCID record for Rongfang Yan [Opens in a new window]
Zhouxia Guo
Affiliation:
College of Mathematics and Statistics, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Jiandong Zhang
Affiliation:
College of Mathematics and Statistics, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Rongfang Yan*
Affiliation:
College of Mathematics and Statistics, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China. E-mail: [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article discusses the stochastic behavior and reliability properties for the inactivity times of failed components in coherent systems under double monitoring. A mixture representation of reliability function is obtained for the inactivity times of failed components, and some stochastic comparison results are also established. Furthermore, some sufficient conditions are developed in terms of the aging properties of the inactivity times of failed components. Finally, some numerical examples are presented to illustrate the theoretical results.

Keywords

Coherent systemDouble monitoringInactivity timeSignature vectorStochastic orders
Type
Research Article
Information
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , July 2022 , pp. 923 - 940
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amini-Seresht, E., Kelkinnama, M., & Zhang, Y. (2020). On the residual and past lifetimes of coherent systems under random monitoring. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269964820000078, 1– 16.Google Scholar
Arnold, B.C., Balakrishnan, N., & Nagaraja, H.N. (1992). A first course in order statistics, vol. 54, USA: SIAM.Google Scholar
Asadi, M. (2006). On the mean past lifetime of the components of a parallel system. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 136(4): 1197–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakrishnan, N. & Zhao, P. (2013). Ordering properties of order statistics from heterogeneous populations: a review with an emphasis on some recent developments. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 27(4): 403–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, E. & Proschan, F. (1975). Statistical theory of reliability and life testing: probability models (International series in decision processes). Holt: Rinehart & Winston of Canada Ltd.Google Scholar
Belzunce, F., Riquelme, C.M., & Mulero, J. (2015). An introduction to stochastic orders. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Block, H.W., Dugas, M.R., & Samaniego, F.J. (2007). Signature-related results on system lifetimes. In Zhang, Heping (ed.), Advances in statistical modeling and inference, USA: World Scientific, pp. 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boland, P.J. (2001). Signatures of indirect majority systems. Journal of Applied Probability 38(2): 597–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boland, P.J. & Samaniego, F.J. (2004). The signature of a coherent system and its applications in reliability. Boston, MA: Springer US, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
Coolen, F.P.A. & Coolen-Maturi, T. (2012). Generalizing the signature to systems with multiple types of components. In Kacprzyk, Janusz (ed.), Complex systems and dependability, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 115–130.Google Scholar
Da, G., Zheng, B., & Hu, T. (2012). On computing signatures of coherent systems. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 103(1): 142–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da, G., Xu, M., & Chan, P.S. (2018). An efficient algorithm for computing the signatures of systems with exchangeable components and applications. IISE Transactions 50(7): 584–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, W., Li, X., & Balakrishnan, N. (2012). Monotonicity properties of residual lifetimes of parallel systems and inactivity times of series systems with heterogeneous components. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 26(1): 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, W., Fang, R., & Zhao, P. (2020). An approach to comparing coherent systems with ordered components by using survival signatures. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, pp(99): 1–12.Google Scholar
Goli, S. (2019). On the conditional residual lifetime of coherent systems under double regularly checking. Naval Research Logistics 66(4): 352–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goliforushani, S. & Asadi, M. (2011). Stochastic ordering among inactivity times of coherent systems. Sankhya B 73(2): 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goliforushani, S., Asadi, M., & Balakrishnan, N. (2012). On the residual and inactivity times of the components of used coherent systems. Journal of Applied Probability 49(2): 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Z., Zhang, J., & Yan, R. (2020). The residual lifetime of surviving components of coherent system under periodical inspections. Mathematics 8(12): 2181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, N., Misra, N., & Kumar, S. (2015). Stochastic comparisons of residual lifetimes and inactivity times of coherent systems with dependent identically distributed components. European Journal of Operational Research 240(2): 425–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayid, M. & Ahmad, I.A. (2004). On the mean inactivity time ordering with reliability applications. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 18(3): 395–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khaledi, B. & Shaked, M. (2007). Ordering conditional lifetimes of coherent systems. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 137(4): 1173–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochar, S., Mukerjee, H., & Samaniego, F.J. (1999). The signature of a coherent system and its application to comparisons among systems. Naval Research Logistics 46(5): 507–523.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X. & Lu, J. (2003). Stochastic comparisons on residual life and inactivity time of series and parallel systems. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 17(2): 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X. & Zhang, Z. (2008). Some stochastic comparisons of conditional coherent systems. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 24(6): 541–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X. & Zhao, P. (2008). Stochastic comparison on general inactivity time and general residual life of $k$-out-of-$n$ systems. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation 37(5): 1005–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marichal, J. & Mathonet, P. (2011). Extensions of system signatures to dependent lifetimes: explicit expressions and interpretations. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 102(5): 931–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A.W. & Olkin, I. (2007). Life distributions, vol. 13. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Nama, M.K. & Asadi, M. (2013). Stochastic properties of components in a used coherent system. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability 16(3): 675–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J. (2016). Distribution-free comparisons of residual lifetimes of coherent systems based on copula properties. Statistical Papers 59(2): 781–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J. (2018). Stochastic comparisons of coherent systems. Metrika 81(4): 465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J. & Calì, C. (2018). Inactivity times of coherent systems with dependent components under periodical inspections. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 35(3): 871–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J. & Rubio, R. (2009). Computations of signatures of coherent systems with five components. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation 39(1): 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J. & Rychlik, T. (2007). Reliability and expectation bounds for coherent systems with exchangeable components. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 98(1): 102–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Belzunce, F., & Ruiz, J.M. (1997). New stochastic orders based on double truncation. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 11(3): 395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Samaniego, F.J., Balakrishnan, N., & Bhattacharya, D. (2008). On the application and extension of system signatures in engineering reliability. Naval Research Logistics (NRL) 55(4): 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rychlik, T. (1994). Distributions and expectations of order statistics for possibly dependent random variables. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 48(1): 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salehi, E. & Tavangar, M. (2019). Stochastic comparisons on conditional residual lifetime and inactivity time of coherent systems with exchangeable components. Statistics & Probability Letters 145: 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samaniego, F.J. (1985). On closure of the IFR class under formation of coherent systems. IEEE Transactions on Reliability R-34(1): 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samaniego, F.J. (2007). System signatures and their applications in engineering reliability, vol. 110. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaked, M. & Shanthikumar, G. (2007). Stochastic orders. New York: Springer Science Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavangar, M. (2016). Conditional inactivity time of components in a coherent operating system. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 65(1): 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavangar, M. & Asadi, M. (2009). A study on the mean past lifetime of the components of ($n-k+1$)-out-of-$n$ system at the system level. Metrika 72(1): 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, P., Li, X., & Balakrishnan, N. (2008). Conditional ordering of $k$-out-of-$n$ systems with independent but nonidentical components. Journal of Applied Probability 45(4): 1113–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar