Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:39:48.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COMPARISONS ON LARGEST ORDER STATISTICS FROM HETEROGENEOUS GAMMA SAMPLES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Ting Zhang ,
Yiying Zhang Open the ORCID record for Yiying Zhang [Opens in a new window]  and
Peng Zhao Open the ORCID record for Peng Zhao [Opens in a new window]
Ting Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Statistics and Data Science, LPMC and KLMDASR, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China E-mail: [email protected]
Yiying Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Statistics and Data Science, LPMC and KLMDASR, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China E-mail: [email protected]
Peng Zhao
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper deals with stochastic comparisons of the largest order statistics arising from two sets of independent and heterogeneous gamma samples. It is shown that the weak supermajorization order between the vectors of scale parameters together with the weak submajorization order between the vectors of shape parameters imply the reversed hazard rate ordering between the corresponding maximum order statistics. We also establish sufficient conditions of the usual stochastic ordering in terms of the p-larger order between the vectors of scale parameters and the weak submajorization order between the vectors of shape parameters. Numerical examples and applications in auction theory and reliability engineering are provided to illustrate these results.

Keywords

gamma distributionlargest order statisticsmajorizationp-larger orderreversed hazard rate orderusual stochastic order
Type
Research Article
Information
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 611 - 630
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Balakrishnan, N. (2007). Permanents, order statistics, outliers, and robustness. Revista Matemática Complutense 20: 7–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Balakrishnan, N. & Rao, C.R. (1998). Handbook of statistics. Vol. 16: Order statistics: theory and methods. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
3.Balakrishnan, N., Rao, C.R. (1998). Handbook of statistics. Vol. 17: Order statistics: applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
4.Balakrishnan, N. & Zhao, P. (2013). Hazard rate comparison of parallel systems with heterogeneous gamma components. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 113: 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Barlow, R.E. & Proschan, F. (1975). Statistical theory of reliability and life testing: probability models. Silver Spring, MD: To Begin With.Google Scholar
6.Bon, J.L. & Pǎltǎnea, E. (1999). Ordering properties of convolutions of exponential random variables. Lifetime Data Analysis 5: 185–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Bon, J.L. & Pǎltǎnea, E. (2006). Comparisons of order statistics in a random sequence to the same statistics with i.i.d. variables. ESAIM: Probability and Statistics 10: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Cantillon, E. (2008). The effect of bidders' asymmetries on expected revenue in auctions. Games and Economic Behavior 62: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Chen, J. & Xu, M. (2015). Asymmetry and revenue in second-price auctions: a majorization approach. Journal of Economics and Finance 39: 625–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.David, H.A. & Nagaraja, H.N. (2003). Order statistics. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Dykstra, R., Kochar, S.C., & Rojo, J. (1997). Stochastic comparisons of parallel systems of heterogeneous exponential components. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 65: 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Kaplan, T.R. & Zamir, S. (2012). Asymmetric first-price auctions with uniform distributions: analytic solutions to the general case. Economic Theory 50: 269–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Khaledi, B.-E. & Kochar, S.C. (2000). Some new results on stochastic comparisons of parallel systems. Journal of Applied Probability 37: 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Khaledi, B.-E., Farsinezhad, S., & Kochar, S.C. (2011). Stochastic comparisons of order statistics in the scale models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 141: 276–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Kochar, S.C. & Xu, M. (2007). Stochastic comparisons of parallel systems when components have proportional hazard rates. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Science 21: 597–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Krishna, V. (2009). Auction theory. Hoboken, NJ: Academic Press.Google Scholar
17.Mao, T. & Hu, T. (2010). Equivalent characteriztions on orderings of order statistics and sample ranges. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Science 24: 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Marshall, A.W. & Shaked, M. (1979). Multivariate shock models for distributions with increasing hazard rate average. Annals of Probability 7: 343–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Marshall, A.W., Olkin, I., & Arnold, B.C. (2011). Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications, 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Misra, N. & Misra, A.K. (2013). On comparison of reversed hazard rates of two parallel systems comprising of independent gamma components. Statistics & Probability Letters 83: 1567–1570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Müller, A. & Stoyan, D. (2002). Comparison methods for stochastic models and risks. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
22.Pǎltǎnea, E. (2008). On the comparison in hazard rate ordering of fail-safe systems. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 138: 1993–1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Pledger, P., Proschan, F. (1971). Comparisons of order statistics and of spacings from heterogeneous distributions. In Rustagi, J.S. (ed.), Optimizing methods in statistics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 89–113.Google Scholar
24.Proschan, F. & Sethuraman, J. (1976). Stochastic comparisons of order statistics from heterogeneous populations, with applications in reliability. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 6: 608–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Shaked, M. & Shanthikumar, J.G. (1992). Optimal allocation of resources to nodes of parallel and series systems. Advances in Applied Probability 24: 894–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Shaked, M. & Shanthikumar, J.G. (2007). Stochastic orders. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Sun, L. & Zhang, X. (2005). Stochastic comparisons of order statistics from gamma distributions. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 93: 112–121.Google Scholar
28.Zhang, Y. & Zhao, P. (2017). On the maxima of heterogeneous gamma variables. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 46: 5056–5071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Zhang, Y. & Zhao, P. (2019). Optimal allocation of minimal repairs in parallel and series systems. Naval Research Logistics 66: 517–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Zhao, P. & Balakrishnan, N. (2011). New results on comparisons of parallel systems with heterogeneous gamma components. Statistics & Probability Letters 81: 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Zhao, P. & Balakrishnan, N. (2011). Some characterization results for parallel systems with two heterogeneous exponential components. Statistics 45: 593–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Zhao, P. & Balakrishnan, N. (2014). A stochastic inequality for the largest order statistics from heterogeneous gamma samples. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 129: 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Zhao, P. & Zhang, Y. (2014). On the maxima of heterogeneous gamma variables with different shape and scale parameters. Metrika 77: 811–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar