Article contents
ASYMPTOTIC RUIN PROBABILITIES IN FINITE HORIZON WITH SUBEXPONENTIAL LOSSES AND ASSOCIATED DISCOUNT FACTORS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 December 2005
Abstract
Consider a discrete-time insurance risk model with risky investments. Under the assumption that the loss distribution belongs to a certain subclass of the subexponential class, Tang and Tsitsiashvili (Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 108(2): 299–325 (2003)) established a precise estimate for the finite time ruin probability. This article extends the result both to the whole subexponential class and to a nonstandard case with associated discount factors.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 2006 , pp. 103 - 113
- Copyright
- © 2006 Cambridge University Press
References
REFERENCES
Cai, J.
(2002).
Discrete time risk models under rates of interest.
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences
16(3):
309–324.Google Scholar
Cai, J.
(2002).
Ruin probabilities with dependent rates of interest.
Journal of Applied Probability
39(2):
312–323.Google Scholar
Cai, J.
(2004).
Ruin probabilities and penalty functions with stochastic rates of
interest.
Stochastic Processes and Their Applications
112(1):
53–78.Google Scholar
Cai, J. &
Dickson, D.C.M.
(2004).
Ruin probabilities with a Markov chain interest model.
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics
35(3):
513–525.Google Scholar
Cline, D.B.H.
(1986).
Convolution tails, product tails and domains of attraction.
Probability Theory and Related Fields
72(4):
529–557.Google Scholar
Cline, D.B.H. &
Samorodnitsky, G.
(1994).
Subexponentiality of the product of independent random
variables.
Stochastic Processes and Their Applications
49(1):
75–98.Google Scholar
Embrechts, P. &
Goldie, C.M.
(1980).
On closure and factorization properties of subexponential and
related distributions.
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, Series A
29(2):
243–256.Google Scholar
Embrechts, P.,
Klüppelberg, C., &
Mikosch, T.
(1997).
Modelling extremal events for insurance and finance.
Berlin:
Springer-Verlag.CrossRef
Esary, J.D.,
Proschan, F., &
Walkup, D.W.
(1967).
Association of random variables, with applications.
Annals of Mathematical Statistics
38(5):
1466–1474.Google Scholar
Gaier, J. &
Grandits, P.
(2002).
Ruin probabilities in the presence of regularly varying tails and
optimal investment.
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics
30(2):
211–217.Google Scholar
Gaier, J.,
Grandits, P., &
Schachermayer, W.
(2003).
Asymptotic ruin probabilities and optimal investment.
Annals of Applied Probability
13(3):
1054–1076.Google Scholar
Hipp, C. &
Plum, M.
(2000).
Optimal investment for insurers.
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics
27(2):
215–228.Google Scholar
Liu, C.S. &
Yang, H.
(2004).
Optimal investment for an insurer to minimize its probability of
ruin.
North American Actuary Journal
8(2):
11–31.Google Scholar
Nyrhinen, H.
(1999).
On the ruin probabilities in a general economic environment.
Stochastic Processes and Their Applications
83(2):
319–330.Google Scholar
Nyrhinen, H.
(2001).
Finite and infinite time ruin probabilities in a stochastic economic
environment.
Stochastic Processes and Their Applications
92(2):
265–285.Google Scholar
Resnick, S.I. &
Willekens, E.
(1991).
Moving averages with random coefficients and random coefficient
autoregressive models.
Communications in Statistics—Stochastic Models
7(4):
511–525.Google Scholar
Tang, Q. &
Tsitsiashvili, G.
(2003).
Precise estimates for the ruin probability in finite horizon in a
discrete-time model with heavy-tailed insurance and financial
risks.
Stochastic Processes and Their Applications
108(2):
299–325.Google Scholar
Tang, Q. &
Tsitsiashvili, G.
(2003).
Randomly weighted sums of subexponential random variables with
application to ruin theory.
Extremes
6(3):
171–188.Google Scholar
Tang, Q. &
Tsitsiashvili, G.
(2004).
Finite and infinite time ruin probabilities in the presence of
stochastic return on investments.
Advances in Applied Probability
36(4):
1278–1299.Google Scholar
- 13
- Cited by