Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:49:11.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MODELS BASED ON PARTIAL INFORMATION ABOUT SURVIVAL AND HAZARD GRADIENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2010

Majid Asadi
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, 81744, Iran E-mail: [email protected]
Somayeh Ashrafi
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, 81744, Iran E-mail: [email protected]
Nader Ebrahimi
Affiliation:
Division of Statistics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60155 E-mail: [email protected]
Ehsan S. Soofi
Affiliation:
Sheldon B. Lubar School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This article develops information optimal models for the joint distribution based on partial information about the survival function or hazard gradient in terms of inequalities. In the class of all distributions that satisfy the partial information, the optimal model is characterized by well-known information criteria. General results relate these information criteria with the upper orthant and the hazard gradient orderings. Applications include information characterizations of the bivariate Farlie–Gumbel–Morgenstern, bivariate Gumbel, and bivariate generalized Gumbel, for which no other information characterization are available. The generalized bivariate Gumbel model is obtained from partial information about the survival function and hazard gradient in terms of marginal hazard rates. Other examples include dynamic information characterizations of the bivariate Lomax and generalized bivariate Gumbel models having marginals that are transformations of exponential such as Pareto, Weibull, and extreme value. Mixtures of bivariate Gumbel and generalized Gumbel are obtained from partial information given in terms of mixtures of the marginal hazard rates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Asadi, M., Ebrahimi, N., Hamedani, G.G., & Soofi, E.S. (2004). Maximum dynamic entropy models. Journal of Applied Probability 41: 379390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Asadi, M., Ebrahimi, N., & Soofi, E.S. (2005). Dynamic generalized information measures. Statistics and Probability Letters 71: 8598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Asadi, M., Ebrahimi, N., Hamedani, G.G., & Soofi, E.S. (2005). Dynamic minimum discrimination information models. Journal of Applied Probability 42: 643660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Di Crescenzo, A. & Longobardi, M. (2002). Entropy-based measure of uncertainty in past lifetime distributions. Journal of Applied Probability 39: 434440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Di Crescenzo, A. & Longobardi, M. (2004). A measure of discrimination between past life-time distributions. Statistics and Probability Letters 67: 173182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Ebrahimi, N., Kirmani, S.N.U.A., & Soofi, E.S. (2007). Dynamic multivariate information. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 98: 328349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Ebrahimi, N., Soofi, E.S., & Soyer, R. (2008). Multivariate maximum entropy identification, transformation, and dependence. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 99: 12171231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Ebrahimi, N., Soofi, E.S., & Soyer, R. (2010). Information measures in perspective. International Statistical Review, 78: 10181019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Ebrahimi, N., Hamedani, G.G., Soofi, E.S., & Volkmer, H. (2010). A class of models for uncorrelated random variables. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 101: 18591871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Gokhale, D.V. & Kullback, S. (1978). The information in contingency tables. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
11.Hu, H., Khaledi, B., & Shaked, M. (2003). Multivariate hazard rate orders. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 84: 173189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Jaynes, E.T. (1957). Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physics Review 106: 620630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Joe, H. (1997). Multivariate models and multivariate dependence concepts. New York: Chapman Hall.Google Scholar
14.Johnson, N.L. & Kotz, S. (1975). A vector multivariate hazard rate. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 5: 5366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Karia, S.R. & Deshpande, J.V. (1999). Bounds for the hazard gradients in the competing risks set up. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 75: 363377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Khaledi, B.E. & Kochar, S. (2005). Dependence, dispersiveness, and multivariate hazard rate ordering. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 19: 427446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Kotz, S., Navarro, J., & Ruiz, J.M. (2007). Characterizations of Arnold and Strauss' and related bivariate exponential models. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 98: 14941507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Kullback, S. (1959). Information theory and statistics. New York: Wiley. (Reprinted in 1968 by Dover.)Google Scholar
19.Lee, M.L.T. (1985). Dependence by reverse regular rule. Annals of Probability 13: 583591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Marshall, A.W. (1975). Some comments on the hazard gradient. Stochastic processes and their Applications 3: 293300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.McGill, J.I. (1992). The multivariate hazard gradient and moments of the truncated multinormal distribution. Communications in Statistics, Theory, and Methods 21: 30533060.Google Scholar
22.Navarro, J. & Ruiz, J.M. (2004). A characterization of the multivariate normal distribution by using the hazard gradient. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 56: 361367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Shaked, M. & Shanthikumar, J.G. (2007). Stochastic orders. Amsterdam: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Shore, J.E. & Johnson, R.W. (1980). Axiomatic derivation of the principle of maximum entropy and the principle of minimum cross-entropy. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 26: 2637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar