Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:45:26.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Binge eating disorder: general practitioners' constructs of an ambiguous pathology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2006

Elizabeth Henderson
Affiliation:
School of Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Carl May
Affiliation:
Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, UK
Carolyn A. Chew-Graham
Affiliation:
School of Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Eating disorders are amongst the most commonly encountered psychiatric disorders experienced by young women. Binge eating disorder (BED) has received some support as a distinct pathology, but is hard to disentangle from other kinds of behaviours. This qualitative study explored awareness and knowledge of BED amongst a group of 18 inner-city general practitioners in NW England. Thematic coding of their accounts suggested a dichotomous tension. (1) Subjects were largely unaware of the existence of BED, and found it difficult to conceptualize its diagnosis and management in primary care. (2) Subjects framed BED as a ‘disorder’ that was firmly within the sphere of patients' personal responsibility, and recognized that psychological distress would be an important causal factor in its aetiology. Subjects were reluctant to consider BED as a diagnosis for obese patients because of the absence of services for onward referral, and because of uncertainties about effective treatment.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2003 Arnold