Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:23:00.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Withholding CPR in the Prehospital Setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Samuel J. Stratton
Samuel J. Stratton
Affiliation:
EMS Medical Director, Los Angeles County, California, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The expansion of hospices and recognition of living wills have made it necessary for emergency care providers to re-evaluate the appropriateness of universal application of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the field. The prehospital care community is coming to realize that CPR is beneficial only in certain specific situations. Some believe that when CPR is not likely to be beneficial, it should be withheld. Withholding CPR seems to be a simple matter of law and science, but a number of factors complicate the issue, especially in the prehospital setting: What are the definitive signs of irreversible, sudden death? When is the application of CPR futile? What are the responsibilities of the prehospital emergency care provider who announce someone dead? What is the lay public's perception of stopping or withholding CPR? Withholding CPR in this environment is a complicated social and emotional issue as well as a scientific and legal one.

Type
Controversy
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 45 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Haynes, BE and Niemann, JT: Letting go: DNR orders in prehospital care. JAMA 1985; 254:532–533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Roth, R, Stewart, RD, Rogers, K, et al: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: factors associated with survival. Ann Emerg Med 1984; 13:237–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Department of Health Services, County of Los Angeles: Withholding or discontinuing resuscitation. Prehospital Care Policy Manual 1989; ref 814.Google Scholar
4. Curran, WJ, McGarry, AL, Petty, CS: Modern Legal Medicine, Psychiatry and Forensic Science. Philadelphia; FA Davis Co, 1980, pp. 151–154.Google Scholar
5. O'Keeffe, KM: Accidental hypothermia. A review of 62 cases. JACEP 1977; 6:491–496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. O'Keeffe, KM: Death and dying. JACEP 1979; 8:275–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Jezierski, M, Crimmins, T: Minneapolis prehospital do-not-resuscitate form provides model for others. J Emerg Nursing 1988; 14:26A–29A.Google ScholarPubMed
8. Personal Communication: RT Pitts, DO, FACEP, Santa Ana, Ca., 92711, USA.Google Scholar
9. ACEP: Guidelines for “do not resuscitate” orders in the prehospital setting. Ann Emerg Med 1988; 17:1106–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Kellerman, AL, Staves, DR, Hackman, BB: In-hospital resuscitation following unsuccessful prehospital advanced cardiac life support: “heroic efforts” or an exercise in futility? Ann Emerg Med 1988; 17:589–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar