Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T13:22:58.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Triage in Mass-Casualty Events: The Haitian Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2011

Ofer Merin ,
Ian N. Miskin ,
Guy Lin ,
Itay Wiser  and
Yitshak Kreiss
Ofer Merin
Affiliation:
Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps Field Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel Trauma Unit and Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
Ian N. Miskin
Affiliation:
Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps Field Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel Clalit Health Services, Jerusalem District, Israel
Guy Lin
Affiliation:
General Surgery, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
Itay Wiser
Affiliation:
Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps Field Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
Yitshak Kreiss
Affiliation:
Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps Field Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction: Mass-casualty triage is implemented when available resources are insufficient to meet the needs of all patients in a disaster situation. The basic principle is to do the maximum good for the most casualties with the least amount of resources. There are limited data to support the applicability of this principle in massive disasters such as the January 2010 earthquake in Haiti, in which the number of patients seeking medical attention overwhelmed the local resources.

Objective: To analyze the application of a triage system developed for use in a mass-casualty setting with limited resources. The system was designed to admit only those patients who had medical conditions requiring urgent treatment that were within the capabilities of the hospital and had a good chance of survival after discharge. Priority was given to those whose treatment could be administered within a short hospital stay.

Method: A retrospective, observational review of computerized registration forms of Haitian earthquake victims who sought medical care at a 72-bed field hospital within four to 14 days after the event. An analysis of the efficacy of the triage protocol that was used followed, using length of hospital stay to measure consumption of resources.

Results: A total of 1,111 patients were triaged for treatment in the field hospital within 14 days of the earthquake. The median length of stay for all patients for whom data was available was 16 hours (mean = 29.7 hours). The majority of patients (n = 620, 65%) were discharged within 24 hours. Two hundred five patients underwent surgery and were discharged within a median of 39 hours (mean = 52.6 hours); of these, 124 (62%) were discharged within 48 hours. The total mortality of the treated patients was 1.5% (n = 17).

Conclusions: Currently accepted triage principles for the most part are appropriate for efficiently providing medical care in a disaster area with extremely limited resources, but require extensive adaptation to local conditions.

Keywords

disasterearthquake emergencyfield hospitalHaitihumanitarian assistancemass casualtyprehospitaltriage
Type
Case Study
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 26 , Issue 5 , October 2011 , pp. 386 - 390
Copyright
Copyright Merin © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Booth, CMStewart, TE: Severe acute respiratory syndrome and critical care medicine: The Toronto experience. Crit Care Med 2005;33:S53–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Lemaitre, MCarrat, F: Comparative age distribution of influenza morbidity and mortality during seasonal influenza epidemics and the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. BMC Infect Dis 2010;10:162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Cushman, JGPachter, HLBeaton, HL: Two New York City hospitals' surgical response to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack in New York City. J Trauma 2003;54:147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Devereaux, AVDichter, JRChristian, MD et al. : Definitive care for the critically ill during a disaster: A framework for allocation of scarce resources in mass critical care. Chest 2008;133:51s–66s.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Schultz, CHKoenig, KLNoji, EK: A medical disaster response to reduce immediate mortality after an earthquake. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:438–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Super, G: START: A Triage Training Module. Newport Beach, California: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, 1984.Google Scholar
7.Domestic Preparedness Training Program Instructor Guide. Soldier and Biological Chemical Command, Department of Defense, 1999.Google Scholar
8.Kahn, CASchultz, CHMiller, KTAnderson, CL: Does START triage work? An outcomes assessment after a disaster. Ann Emerg Med 2009;54:424–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Launching a National Surveillance System after an earthquake – Haiti, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Aug 6;59 (30):933–938Google Scholar
10.Kriess, YMerin, OPeleg, K, et al. : Early disaster response in Haiti: The Israeli field hospital experience. Ann Intern Med 2010;153:45–88. Epub 2010 May 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Merin, OAsh, NLevy, GSchwaber, MJKreiss, Y: The Israeli field hospital in Haiti–ethical dilemmas in early disaster response. N Engl J Med 2010;362:e38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.American College of Emergency Physicians: Disaster Medical Services. 2006. Available at http://www.acep.org/webportal/PracticeResources/PolicyStatements/ems/dismedsvc.htm. Accessed 21 June 2006.Google Scholar
13.Benson, DKoenig, KLSchultz, CH: Disaster triage: START then SAVE - a new method of dynamic triage for victims of a catastrophic earthquake. Prehosp Disaster Med 1996;11:117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Sacco, WNavin, MFiedler, KWaddell, RK 2ndLong, WBBuckman, RF Jr.: Precise formulation and evidence based application of resource constrained triage. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12:759–770.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Pesik, NKeim, MEIserson, KV: Terrorism and the ethics of emergency medical care medical care. Ann Emerg Med: 2001;37:642–646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.World Medical Association Statement on Medical Ethics in the Event of Disasters. Adopted by the 46th WMA General Assembly Stockholm, Sweden, September 1994 and revised by the WMA General Assembly, Pilanesberg, South Africa, October 2006. Available at: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/d7/index.html. Accessed 11 May 2010.Google Scholar
17.Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee: Consensus statement on the triage of critically ill patients. JAMA 1994;271:1200–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.O'Laughlin, DTHick, JL: Ethical issues in resource triage. Respir Care 2008;53 (2):190–197.Google ScholarPubMed
19.White, DBKatz, MHLuce, JMLo, B: Who should receive life support during a public health emergency? Using ethical principles to improve allocation decisions. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:132–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Sztajnkrycer, MDMadsen, BEBaez, AA: Unstable ethical plateaus and disaster triage. Emerg Med Clin N Am 2006;24:749–768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Dara, SIFarmer, JC: Preparedness lessons from modern disasters and wars. Crit Care Clin 2009;25:47–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Altered Standards of Care in Mass Casualty Events: Bioterrorism and Other Public Health Emergencies. AHRQ Publication No. 05-0043. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; April 2005, 16-18. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/research/altstand/index.html. Accessed 27 November 2006.Google Scholar
23.Holt, GH: Making difficult ethical decisions in patient care during natural disasters and other mass casualty events. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;4139:181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Frykberg, ER: Principles of mass casualty management following terrorist disasters. Ann Surg 2004;239:319–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed