Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T13:19:57.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Swedish Ambulance Managers’ Descriptions of Crisis Support for Ambulance Staff After Potentially Traumatic Events

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2014

Karin Hugelius ,
Sara Berg ,
Elin Westerberg ,
Mervyn Gifford  and
Annsofie Adolfsson
Karin Hugelius*
Affiliation:
School of Health and Medical Science, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden Department of Anaesthesia, Karlskoga Hospital, Karlskoga, Sweden
Sara Berg
Affiliation:
School of Health and Medical Science, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden Ambulance Department, Värmland County Council, Karlstad, Sweden
Elin Westerberg
Affiliation:
School of Health and Medical Science, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden Ambulance Department, Värmland County Council, Karlstad, Sweden
Mervyn Gifford
Affiliation:
School of Health and Medical Science, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
Annsofie Adolfsson
Affiliation:
School of Health and Medical Science, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
*
Correspondence: Karin Hugelius, RN, MSc School of Health and Medical Science Örebro University 70281 Örebro, Sweden E-mail [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

Ambulance staff face complex and sometimes stressful or potentially traumatic situations, not only in disasters but also in their routine daily work. The aim of this study was to survey ambulance managers’ descriptions of crisis support interventions for ambulance staff after potential traumatic events (PTEs).

Methods

Semistructured interviews with a qualitative descriptive design were conducted with six ambulance managers in a health care region in central Sweden. The data was analyzed using content analysis.

Result

Five categories were found in the result: (1) description of a PTE; (2) description and performance of crisis support interventions; (3) impact of working in potentially traumatic situations; (4) the ambulance managers’ role in crisis support interventions; and (5) the ambulance managers’ suggestions for improvement. Ambulance managers described crisis support interventions after a PTE as a single, mandatory group meeting with a structure reminiscent of debriefing. The ambulance managers also expressed doubts about the present structures for crisis support and mentioned an alternative approach which is more in line with present evidence-based recommendations.

Conclusion

The results indicated a need for increased understanding of the importance of the managers’ attitudes for ambulance staff; a need for further implementation of evidence-based recommendations for crisis support interventions was also highlighted.

HugeliusK , BergS , WesterbergE , GiffordM , AdolfssonA . Swedish Ambulance Managers’ Descriptions of Crisis Support for Ambulance Staff After Potentially Traumatic Events. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(6):1-4.

Keywords

ambulancemanagementstress
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 29 , Issue 6 , December 2014 , pp. 589 - 592
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Norris, FH. Epidemiology of trauma: frequency and impact of different potentially traumatic events on different demographic groups. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992;60(3):409-418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Bonanno, G. Loss, trauma and human resilience: how we underestimate the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? Am Psychol. 2004;59(1):20-28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Declereq, F, Meganck, R, Deheegher, J, Hoorde Van, H. Frequency of and subjective response to critical incidents in the prediction of PTSD in emergency personnel. J Trauma Stress. 2011;24(1):133-136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Jonsson, A, Segersten, K. Post- traumatic stress among Swedish ambulance personnel. Prehosp Care. 2003;20(1):79-84.Google ScholarPubMed
5. Halpern, J, Gurevich, M, Schwartz, B, Brazeau, P. Interventions for critical incident stress in emergency medical services: a qualitative study. Stress Health. 2009;25(2):139-149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Alexander, DA, Klein, S. Ambulance personnel and critical incidents: Impact of accident and emergency work on mental health and emotional well-being. Br J Psychiatry. 2001;178(1):76-81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Jonsson, A, Segersten, K. Daily Stress and concept of self in Swedish ambulance personnel. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2004;19(3):226-234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Rose, SC, Bisson, J, Churchill, R, Wessly, S. Psychological debriefing for preventing post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006.Google Scholar
9. Van Emmerik, A, Kamphuis, J, Hulsbosch, A, Emmelkamp, PMG. Single session debriefing after psychological trauma: a meta analysis. Lancet. 2002;360(9335):766-771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Swedish National Board of Social Health and Welfare. Krisstöd vid allvarlig händelse. 2008.Google Scholar
11. Brymer, M, Jacobs, A, Layne, C , et al. Psychological First Aid. Field Operations Guide. 2 E. National Child Traumatic Stress Network and National Center for PTSD. 2006. http://www.nctsn.org/content/psychological-first-aid. Accessed April 2, 2013.Google Scholar
12. TENTS. The European Network for Traumatic Stress (TENTS). Riktlinjer för stöd och behandling efter allvarliga händelser (Guidelines for support and treatment after traumatic events). 2008. http://www.estss.org/uploads/2011/04/154The_TENTS_Guidelines_99×210_LOW3_2520svenska.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2013.Google Scholar
13. Hobfoll, S, Watson, P, Bell, C, et al. Five essential elements of immediate and mid- term mass trauma intervention: empirical evidence. Psychiatry. 2007;70(4):283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Polit, D, Beck, C. Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice, 8th edition. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008:10-796.Google Scholar
15. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Graneheim, UH, Lundman, B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to archive truthfulness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105-112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Tuckey, MR, Scott, JE. Group critical incident stress debriefing with emergency services personnel: a randomized controlled trial. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2013;27(1):38-54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Villando, A, Arthur, W. The comparative effect of subjective and objective after- action reviews on team performance on complex task. J Appl. Pschycol.. 2013;98(3):515-528.Google Scholar
19. USAID. After action review. Technical Guidance. 2006. http://www.usais.after action review.technical guidance. Accessed April 1, 2013.Google Scholar
20. Arnberg, F, Hultman, C, Michel, M, Lundin, T. Social support moderates posttraumatic stress and general distress after disaster. J Trauma Stress. 2012;25(6):721-727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Donnelly, E. Work-related stress and posttraumatic stress in emergency medical services. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012;16(1):76-85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Halpern, J, Maunder, RG, Schwartz, B, Gurevich, M. Identifying sequelae after critical incidents. Emerg Med. 2011;28(1):51-56.Google ScholarPubMed
23. Van der Ploeg, E, Kleber, R. Acute and chronic job stressors among ambulance personnel: predictors of health symptoms. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(1):140-146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Larsson, G, Johansson, A, Jansson, T, Gronlund, G. Leadership under severe stress: a grounded theory study. Concept for Air Force Leadership. 2001;1(1):441-447.Google Scholar
25. Polit, D, Beck, C. Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research; myths and strategies. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(11):1451-1458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed