Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T22:11:00.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Standards in Collaborative International Disaster Drills: A Case Study of Two International Search and Rescue Drills

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Ariel Rokach ,
Moshe Pinkert ,
Dani Nemet ,
Avishay Goldberg  and
Yaron Bar-Dayan
Ariel Rokach
Affiliation:
Israeli Defense Forces Home Front Command Medical Department, Israel
Moshe Pinkert
Affiliation:
Israeli Defense Forces Home Front Command Medical Department, Israel
Dani Nemet
Affiliation:
Israeli Defense Forces Home Front Command National Search and Rescue Unit, Israel
Avishay Goldberg
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
Yaron Bar-Dayan*
Affiliation:
Israeli Defense Forces Home Front Command Medical Department, Israel Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
*
16 Dolev St. Neve Savion Or-Yehuda, Israel E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

During the last few decades, various global disasters have ren-dered nations helpless (such as Thailand's tsunami and earthquakes in Turkey, Pakistan, Iran, and India). A lack of knowledge and resources make it difficult to address such disasters. Preparedness for a national disaster is expensive, and in most cases, unachievable even for modern countries. International collabo-ration might be useful for coping with large-scale disasters. Preparedness for international collaboration includes drills. Two such drills held by the Israeli Home Front Command and other military and civilian bodies with the nations of Greece and Turkey are described in this article.

Methods:

The data were gathered from formal debriefings of the Israeli teams collaborating in two separate drills with Greek and Turkish teams.

Results:

Preparations began four months before the drills were conducted and included three meetings between Israeli and foreign officials. The Israeli and foreign officials agreed upon the drill layout, logistics, communications, resi-dence, real-time medicine, hardware, and equipment. The drills took place in Greece and Turkey and lasted four days. The first day included meetings between the teams and logistics preparations. The second and third days were devoted to exercises. The drills included evacuating casualties from a demoli-tion zone and treating typical injuries such as crush syndrome. Every day ended with a formal debriefing by the teams' commanders. The fourth day included a ceremony and transportation back home. Members in both teams felt the drills improved their skills and had an important impact on creating common language that would enhance cooperation during a real disaster.

Conclusions:

A key factor in the management of large-scale disasters is coor-dination between countries. International drills are important to create com-mon language within similar regulations.

Keywords

collaborationdisaster drillsinternational collaborationsearch-and-rescue
Type
Research Article
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 60 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Brennan, RJ, Waldman, RJ: The south Asian earthquake six months later— An ongoing crisis. N Engl J Med 2006;354:1769–1771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Bremer, R: Policy development in disaster preparedness and management: Lessons learned from the January 2001 earthquake in Gujarat, India. Prehospital Disast Med 2003;18:372–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Owens, PJ, Forgione, A Jr, Briggs, S: Challenges of international disaster relief: use of a deployable rapid assembly shelter and surgical hospital. Disaster Management Response 2005;3:11–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Lee, VJ, Low, E: Coordination and resource maximization during disaster relief efforts. Prehospital Disast Med 2006;21:s8–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Sever, MS, Vanholder, R, Lameire, N: Management of crush-related injuries after disasters. N Engl J Med 2006;354:1052–1063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Bar-Dayan, Y, Beard, P, Mankuta, D, et al. : An earthquake disaster in Turkey: An overview of the experience of the IDF field Hospital in Adapazari. Disasters 2000;24:262–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Bar-Dayan, Y, Leiba, A, Beard, P, et al. : An earthquake disaster in Turkey: An overview of the experience of the IDF field Hospital in Duzce. Prehospital Care and Disaster Medicine 2005;20:103–106.Google Scholar
8. 2006, Innovations in the management of patients involved in disasters. Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Bar-Dayan, Y, Bar Dayan, Y, Martonovits, G, et al. : An earthquake disaster in India: An overview of the Israeli defense forces field hospital in Bhuj—January 2001.Google Scholar
9. Marmor, M, Goldstein, L, Levy, Y, et al. : Mass medical repatriation of injured civilians after the terrorist attack in Mombassa, Kenya on 28 November 2002: Medical needs, resources utilized, and lessons learned. Prehospital Disast Med 2005;20(2):98–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Rokach, A, Bar-Dayan, Y: Management of crush-related injuries after disas-ters. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2511.Google Scholar
11. Leiba, A, Blumenfeld, A, Hourvitz, A, et al. : Cross border medical response to international terror. Lessons learned from the Egypt-Tabba and Ras El Satan experience—October 7th, 2004. Prehospital Disast Med 2005;20:253–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar