Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:08:24.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Self-Assessment of Wisconsin Prehospital Provider Needs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Dean Stueland*
Affiliation:
Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA
Mary Jean Patzner
Affiliation:
Mercy Health Center, Dubuque, Iowa, USA
Robert Rauch
Affiliation:
Paratec Ambulance, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
Marvin L. Birnbaum
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
*
Department of Emergency Medicine 1000, North Oak Avenue, Marshfield, WI 54449–5777USA

Abstract

Introduction:

The pressures facing emergency medical services (EMS) in Wisconsin and their effects on the delivery of prehospital emergency medical care were not known by the Wisconsin EMS Board. In an effort to assess these pressures and the needs of the emergency medical services in the State as perceived by the services, the Board undertook a survey of the EMS providers in Wisconsin.

Methods:

A survey instrument was developed and approved by the EMS Board and distributed to all of the licensed emergency medical services in Wisconsin.

Results:

Of the 453 survey instruments distributed, 323 (71.3%) were completed and returned. Intermediate- and paramedic-level services were more likely to respond than were the basic services, but 235 (72.8%) of the respondents identified their service levels as basic. In addition to providing information about the service characteristics, each responding service also rated the importance of their perceived needs. Lack of medical direction was perceived as the greatest need by all levels of service. However, the second greatest area of need for basic and intermediate services related to difficulty in recruiting new staff. For paramedic services, the second greastest need was associated with dispatching. When comparing services by rural versus urban, difficulty in recruiting new staff and collecting ambulance fees were seen as second and third to lack of a medical director by rural services, whereas urban services noted local training to be in the top three. In the assessment of educational needs, patient-care issues dominated. A review of written comments also demonstrated a difference between rural and urban services, but both noted Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement issues more commonly than any other problem.

Conclusion:

In the restructuring of health care, it will be important to consider the various needs of prehospital providers and recognize that such needs may be unique to the providers' location and level of service.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hintze, JL: Number Crushing Statistical System, Version 5.03, Kaysville, UT, 1990.Google Scholar
2. Samuels, DJ, Bock, HC, Maull, KI, Stoy, WA: EMT-Basic: National Standard Curriculum. Report published as a public service by the Council of State Governments and the National Council of State Emergency Medical Services Training Coordinators, Lexington, KY, 1994.Google Scholar
3. Neale, AB: Work stress and emergency medical technicians. Journal of Occupational Medicine 1991;33:991997.Google ScholarPubMed
4. Brown, LH, Prasad, H, Grimmer, K: Public perceptions of a rural emergency medical services system. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 1994;9:257259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Minutes of the Physician Advisory Committee (16 August, 1995) of the Wisconsin Section of Emergency Medical Services, Department of Health and Services.Google Scholar
6. American College of Emergency Physicians: EMS Medical Direction Methodologies. American College of Emergency Physicians Chapter Grant Program, 19941995.Google Scholar