Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:58:44.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resuscitation for Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Singapore

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Ghee Hian Lim*
Affiliation:
Emergency Department, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
Eillyne Seow
Affiliation:
Emergency Department, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
*
Emergency Department, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11, Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore 308433, SINGAPORE, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Aim:

To evaluate characteristics and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED), and to examine factors that could be used to determine to prolong or abort resuscitation for these patients.

Method:

All OHCA patients presenting to the ED were studied over a three-month period from November 2001 through January 2002. Patient with traumatic cardiac arrest were excluded. Data were collected from the ambulance case records, ED resuscitation charts, and the ED Very High Frequency (VHF) radio case-log sheet. Information collected included the patient's demographic characteristics, timings (time from call to ambulance arrival on scene, time from arrival at scene to departure from scene, time from scene to arrival in the ED) recorded in the pre-hospital setting, the outcome of the resuscitation, and the final outcome for patients who survived ED resuscitation.

Results:

Ninety-three non-traumatic patients with an OHCA were studied during the three-month period. Of the 93 patients, 15 (16.1%) survived ED resuscitation, and one survived to hospital discharge. There were no statistically significant differences for age, race, or gender with regards to the outcome of the resuscitation. The initial cardiac rhythms were asystole (65), pulseless electrical activity (21), and ventricular fibrillation (7). Fourteen (15%) received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). All seven patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) on arrival in the ED survived ED resuscitation. The ambulance took an average of 11.80 ±3.36 minutes for the survivors and 11.8 ±4.22 minutes for the non-survivors from the time of call to get to these patients. The average of the scene times was 12.5 ±4.61 minutes for the survivors and 12.0 ±4.02 minutes for the non-survivors. Transport time from the scene to the ED took an average of 39.1 ±8.32 minutes for the survivors and 37.2 ±9.00 minutes for the non-survivors.

Conclusion:

The survival rate for patients with OHCA after ED resuscitation is similar to the results from other studies. There is a need to increase the awareness and delivery of basic life support by public education. Automatic External Defibrillators (AED) should be available widely to ensure that the chance of early defibrillation is increased. Prolonged resuscitation efforts appear to be futile for OHCA patients if the time from cardiac arrest until arrival in the ED is ≥30 minutes coupled with no ROSC, and if continuous asystole has been documented for >10 minutes.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kellermann, AL, Hackman, BB, Somes, G: Predicting the outcome of unsuccessful pre-hospital advanced cardiac life support. JAMA 1993;270: 14331436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Mc Meyer, AD, Cameron, PA, Smith, KL, McNeil, JJ: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Med J Aust 2000; 172: 5356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Lockey, AS, Haedern, RD: Decision-making by emergency physicians when assessing cardiac arrest patients on arrival at hospital. Resuscitation 2001;50: 5156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Lombardi, G, Gallagher, J, Gennis, P: Outcome of out-of-hospital-cardiac arrest in New York City. The prehospital arrest survival evaluation (PHASE) study. JAMA 1994 271:678683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Cummins, RO, Eisenberg, MS, Hallstrom, AP, et al: Survival of out-of-hos-pital cardiac arrest with early initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med 1985; 3: 114118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Tweed, WA, Bristow, G, Donen, N: Resuscitation from cardiac arrest: Assessment of a system providing only basic life support outside of hospital. Can Med Assoc J 1980; 122: 297300.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Weaver, WD, Cobb, LA, Hallstrom, AP, et al: Considerations for improving survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 15:11811186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Eisenberg, M, Hadas, E, Nuri, I, et al: Sudden cardiac arrest in Israel: Factors associated with successful resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med 1988;6(4): 319323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Seino, Y, Ito, R, Suzuki, I, Enzan, K, Inaba, H: An Utstein-style analysis of prognostic factors related to survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Akita-City, Japan. Tohoku J Exp Med 2001;194(2):107119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Rewers, M, Tilgreen, RE, Crawford, ME, Hjortso, N: One-year survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Copenhagen according to the ‘Utstein style’. Resuscitation 2000;47(2):137146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Khalafi, K, Ravakhah, K, West, BC: Avoiding the futility of resuscitation. Resuscitation 2001; 50: 161166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Gray, WA.: Prehospital resuscitation-The good, the bad and the futile. JAMA 1993; 270: 14711472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association: Guidelines for the appropriate use of do-not-resuscitate orders. JAMA 1991; 265: 18681871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Resuscitation in the elderly: A blessing or a curse? Ann Int Med 1989; 111: 193195. Editorial.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Lewis, LM, Ruoff, B, Rush, C, Stothert, JC: Is emergency department resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims who arrive pulseless worthwhile? Am J Emerg Med 1990; 8: 118120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Juchems, R, Wahlig, G, Frese, W: Influence of age on survival rate of out-of-hospital and in-hospital resuscitation. Resuscitation 1993; 26: 2329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Tunstall-Pedoe, H, Bailey, L, Chamberlain, DA, Marsden, AK, Ward, ME, Zideman, DA: Survey of 3765 cardiopulmonary resuscitations in British hospitals (the BRESUS study): Methods and overall results. BMJ 1992; 304: 13471351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Seow, E, Wong, H P, Phe, A: The pattern of ambulance arrivals in the emergency department of an acute care hospital in Singapore. Emergency Medical Journal 2001; 18: 297299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Gray, WA, Capone, RJ, Most, AS: Unsuccessful emergency medical resuscitations – Are continued efforts in the emergency department justified? N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 13931398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Lim, Hoon Chin, Tham, Kum Ying: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests—The experience of one hospital in Singapore. Resuscitation 2001; 51: 123127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Cummins, RO: The “chain of survivor” concept: How it can save lives. Heart Dis Stroke 1992; 1: 4345.Google Scholar
22. AHA/ILCOR: International Guidelines 2000 for CPR and ECC–A consensus on science. Resuscitation 2000; 46: 13–17.Google Scholar
23. Emergency Cardiac Care Committee and Subcommittees, American Heart Association: Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care. JAMA 1992; 268: 21712302.Google Scholar
24. Westfal, RE: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; An 8-year New York City experience. Am J Emerg Med 1996; 14: 364368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Handley, JA, Handley, AJ: Four step CPR-improving skill retention. Resuscitation 1998; 36: 38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Assar, D, Chamberlain, D, Colquhoun, M, et al: A rationale for staged teaching of basic life support. Resuscitation 1998; 39: 137143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Seow, E, Lim, E: Ambulance response time to emergency department. Singapore Medical Journal 1993; 34: 530532.Google Scholar