Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:22:36.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Perception of Emergency Medical Services in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2016

Remle P. Crowe ,
Roger Levine ,
Severo Rodriguez ,
Ashley D. Larrimore  and
Ronald G. Pirrallo
Remle P. Crowe*
Affiliation:
National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Roger Levine
Affiliation:
Consultant, Redwood City, California, USA
Severo Rodriguez
Affiliation:
National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Ashley D. Larrimore
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Center for Emergency Medical Services, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Ronald G. Pirrallo
Affiliation:
Greenville Health System, Greenville, South Carolina, USA
*
Correspondence: Remle P. Crowe, MS, NREMT National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians 6610 Busch Blvd Columbus, Ohio 43229, USA E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to assess the public’s experience, expectations, and perceptions related to Emergency Medical Services (EMS).

Methods

A population-based telephone interview of adults in the United States was conducted. The survey instrument consisted of 112 items. Demographic variables including age, race, political beliefs, and household income were collected. Data collection was performed by trained interviewers from Kent State University’s (Kent, Ohio USA)Social Research Laboratory. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Comparative analyses were conducted between those who used EMS at least once in the past five years and those who did not use EMS using χ2 and t tests.

Results

A total of 2,443 phone calls were made and 1,348 individuals agreed to complete the survey (55.2%). There were 297 individuals who requested to drop out of the survey during the phone interview, leaving a total of 1,051 (43.0%) full responses. Participants ranged in age from 18 to 94 years with an average age of 57.5 years. Most were Caucasian or white (83.0%), married (62.8%), and held conservative political beliefs (54.8%). Three-fourths of all respondents believed that at least 40% of patients survive cardiac arrest when EMS services are received. Over half (56.7%) believed that Emergency Medical Technician (EMT)-Basics and EMT-Paramedics provide the same level of care. The estimated median hours of training required for EMT-Basics was 100 hours (IQR: 40-200 hours), while the vast majority of respondents estimated that EMT-Paramedics are required to take fewer than 1,000 clock hours of training (99.3%). The majority believed EMS professionals should be screened for illegal drug use (97.0%), criminal background (95.9%), mental health (95.2%), and physical fitness (91.3%). Over one-third (37.6%) had used EMS within the past five years. Of these individuals, over two-thirds (69.6%) rated their most recent experience as “excellent.” More of those who used EMS at least once in the past five years reported a willingness to consent to participate in EMS research compared with those who had not used EMS (69.9% vs. 61.4%, P=.005).

Conclusions

Most respondents who had used EMS services rated their experience as excellent. Nevertheless, expectations related to survival after cardiac arrest in the out-of-hospital setting were not realistic. Furthermore, much of the public was unaware of the differences in training hour requirements and level of care provided by EMT-Basics and EMT-Paramedics.

CroweRP, LevineR, RodriguezS, LarrimoreAD, PirralloRG. Public Perception of Emergency Medical Services in the United States. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(Suppl. 1):s112–s117.

Keywords

Emergency Medical Servicesparamedicprehospitalpublic opinion
Type
Research Article
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 31 , Supplement S1: The Longitudinal Emergency Medical Technician Attributes and Demographics Study (LEADS): The First 10 Years and a Look at Public Perception of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) , December 2016 , pp. S112 - S117
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: none

References

1. National Emergency Number Association. 9-1-1 statistics. https://www.nena.org/?page=911Statistics. Published 2014. Accessed March 26, 2016.Google Scholar
2. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. EMS Agenda for the Future. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 1996.Google Scholar
3. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The Emergency Medical Services Workforce Agenda for the Future. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2011.Google Scholar
4. Persse, DE, Jarvis, JL, Corpening, J, Harris, B. Customer satisfaction in a large urban fire department emergency medical services system. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(1):106-110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Doering, GT. Customer care. Patient satisfaction in the prehospital setting. Emerg Med Serv. 1998;27(9):69 71-74.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Studnek, JR, Fernandez, AR, Vandeventer, S, Davis, S, Garvey, L. The association between patients’ perception of their overall quality of care and their perception of pain management in the prehospital setting. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013;17(3):386-391.Google Scholar
7. Colwell, CB, Pons, PT, Pi, R. Complaints against an EMS system. J Emerg Med. 2003;25(4):403-408.Google Scholar
8. Risavi, BL, Buzzard, E, Heile, CJ. Analysis of complaints in a rural emergency medical service system. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(2):184-186.Google Scholar
9. Bogosian, G. The (often) forgotten: EMS in America. JEMS.http://www.jems.com/articles/2016/04/the-often-forgotten-ems-in-america.html. Published 2016. Accessed May 15, 2016.Google Scholar
10. Mackun, P, Wilson, S. Population distribution and change: 2000 to 2010. 2010 Census Briefs. https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-01.pdf. Published 2011. Accessed March 26, 2016.Google Scholar
11. Howden, L, Meyer, J. Age and sex composition: 2010. 2010 Census Briefs. www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-03.pdf. Published 2011. Accessed April 4, 2016.Google Scholar
12. United States Census Bureau 2010. Quick facts. http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045215/00. Accessed April 4, 2016.Google Scholar
13. Snyder, T, Dillow, S. Digest of education statistics 2010. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2011015. Published 2011. Accessed April 3, 2016.Google Scholar
14. United States Census Bureau. America’s families and living arrangements: 2010.http://www.census.gov/hhes/families/data/cps2010.html. Published 2014. Accessed April 3, 2016.Google Scholar
15. United States Census Bureau 2011. 2010 household income. Current Population Survey: Annual Social and Economic (ASEC) Supplement. http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstables/032011/hhinc/hinc01_000.htm. Accessed April 3, 2016.Google Scholar
16. Saad, L. In 2010, Conservatives still outnumber moderates, Liberals. Gallup. http://www.gallup.com/poll/141032/2010-conservatives-outnumber-moderates-liberals.aspx. Published 2010. Accessed April 2, 2016.Google Scholar
17. Diem, SJ, Lantos, JD, Tulsky, JA. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on television—miracles and misinformation. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(24):1578-1582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Portanova, J, Irvine, K, Yi, JY, Enguidanos, S. It isn’t like this on TV: revisiting CPR survival rates depicted on popular TV shows. Resuscitation. 2015;96:148-150.Google Scholar
19. Søholm, H, Hassager, C, Lippert, F, et al. Factors associated with successful resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and temporal trends in survival and comorbidity. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;65(5):523-531.e2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Idris, AH, Guffey, D, Pepe, PE, et al. Chest compression rates and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(4):840-848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Kennedy, GD, Tevis, SE, Kent, KC. Is there a relationship between patient satisfaction and favorable outcomes? Ann Surg. 2014;260(4):592-598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Petrullo, KA, Lamar, S, Nwankwo-Otti, O, Alexander-Mills, K, Viola, D. The Patient Satisfaction Survey: What does it mean to your bottom line? J Hosp Admin. 2012;2(2):1-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Bureau of Labor Statistics. EMTs and Paramedics. Occupational Outlook Handbook. 2016-2017 ed. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC USA. http://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/emts-and-paramedics.htm#tab-4. Published 2015. Accessed April 10, 2016.Google Scholar
24. Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs 2016. Emergency Medical Technician-Paramedic. http://www.caahep.org/content.aspx?id=39. Accessed April 10, 2016.Google Scholar
25. Greene, M, Williams, DM. JEMS 2010 Salary & Workplace Survey: an employee’s journey. J Emerg Med Serv. 2010;35(10):38-47.Google Scholar
26. Kirkwood, S. A troubled state, part 2: what can we learn from Iowa’s experience? EMS World. 2013; 42(9):50--54. http://www.emsworld.com/article/10957667/ems-operations. Accessed May 1, 2016.Google Scholar
27. Blumberg, SJ. Wireless Substitution: State-level Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January 2007-June 2010. Hyattsville, Maryland USA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics; 2011.Google Scholar