Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:09:26.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prehospital Invasive Arterial Pressure: Use of a Minimized Flush System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2018

Jonas Karlsson*
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
Joacim Linde
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Södra Älvsborg Hospital, Borås, Sweden
Christer Svensen
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Unit of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
Mikael Gellerfors
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Unit of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden Swedish Air Ambulance (SLA), Sweden
*
Correspondence: Jonas Karlsson, MD Department of Anaesthesia Södersjukhuset Stockholm, Sweden E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction

Invasive blood pressure (IBP) monitoring could be of benefit for certain prehospital patient groups such as trauma and cardiac arrest patients. However, there are disadvantages with using conventional IBP devices. These include time to prepare the transducer kit and flush system as well as the addition of long tubing connected to the patient. It has been suggested to simplify the IBP equipment by replacing the continuous flush system with a syringe and a short stopcock.

Hypothesis

In this study, blood pressures measured by a standard IBP (sIBP) transducer kit with continuous flush was compared to a transducer kit connected to a simplified and minimized flush system IBP (mIBP) using only a syringe.

Methods

A mechanical, experimental model was used to create arterial pressure pulsations. Measurements were made simultaneously using a sIBP and mIBP device, respectively. This was repeated four times using different mean arterial pressure (MAP): 40, 70, 110, and 140mm Hg. For each series, 16 measurements were taken during 20 minutes. Data were analyzed using Bland-Altman plots. Measurement error greater than five percent was regarded as clinically significant.

Results

Mean bias and standard deviation (SD) for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and MAP was -3.05 (SD = 2.07), 0.2 (SD = 0.48), and -0.3 (SD = 0.55) mmHg, respectively. Bland-Altman plots revealed that the bias and SD for systolic pressures was mainly due to an increased under-estimation of pressures in lower ranges. All MAP and 98.4% of diastolic pressure measurements had an error of less than five percent. Systolic pressures in the MAP 40 series all had an error of greater than five percent. All other systolic pressures had an error of less than five percent.

Conclusion

Thus, IBP with the mIBP flush system provides accurate measurement of MAP and DBP in a wide range of physiological pressures. For SBP, there was a tendency to under-estimate pressures, with larger error in lower pressures. Implementation of a simplified flush system could allow further development and potentially simplify the use of IBP for prehospital critical care teams.

KarlssonJ, LindeJ, SvensenC, GellerforsM. Prehospital Invasive Arterial Pressure: Use of a Minimized Flush System. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(5):490–494.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest/funding: The authors declare that they have no conflicting interests. The DTXplus pressure transducer kits were supplied free of charge from Argon Medical (Argon Medical Devices; Texas USA). No other funding was obtained.

References

1. Wildner, G, Pauker, N, Archan, S, et al. Arterial line in prehospital emergency settings - a feasibility study in four physician-staffed emergency medical systems. Resuscitation. 201;82(9):1198-1201.Google Scholar
2. Sende, J, Jabre, P, Leroux, B, et al. Invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring in an out-of-hospital setting: an observational study. Emerg Med J. 2009;26(3):210-212.Google Scholar
3. Carney, N, Totten, AM, O’Reilly, C, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(1):6-15.Google Scholar
4. Naim, MY, Sutton, RM, Friess, SH, et al. Blood pressure- and coronary perfusion pressure-targeted cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves 24-hour survival from ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(11):e1111-e1117.Google Scholar
5. Meaney, PA, Bobrow, BJ, Mancini, ME, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: [corrected] improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;128(4):417-435.Google Scholar
6. Linde, J. The prehospital arterial line. Prehospital akutsjukvård web page. http://www.prehospitalakutsjukvard.se/2016/11/14/the-prehospital-arterial-line-34138006. Accessed April 12, 2017.Google Scholar
7. Bland, JM, Altman, DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(2):135-160.Google Scholar
8. Harmsen, AM, Giannakopoulos, GF, Moerbeek, PR, Jansma, EP, Bonjer, HJ, Bloemers, FW. The influence of prehospital time on trauma patient outcome: a systematic review. Injury. 2015;46(4):602-609.Google Scholar
9. Østerås, Ø, Brattebø, G, Heltne, JK. Helicopter-based Emergency Medical Services for a sparsely populated region: a study of 42,500 dispatches. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016;60(5):659-667.Google Scholar