Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T02:00:20.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Predictors of Risk Stratification and Value of Point-of-Care of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin-I in EMS Management of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2022

Thomas Pavlovsky
Affiliation:
Emergency Medical Services, Beaujon University Hospital, Clichy, France Emergency Department, Bichat University Hospital, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France
Mathias Obadia
Affiliation:
Emergency Medical Services, Beaujon University Hospital, Clichy, France
Stéphanie Ragot
Affiliation:
Clinical Investigation Center CIC-INSERM1402, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
Benedicte Douay
Affiliation:
Emergency Medical Services, Beaujon University Hospital, Clichy, France
Enrique Casalino
Affiliation:
Emergency Medical Services, Beaujon University Hospital, Clichy, France Emergency Department, Bichat University Hospital, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France IAME (Infection, Antimicrobial, Modeling, Evaluation), INSERM UMR1137, University of Paris, Paris, France
Daniel Aiham Ghazali*
Affiliation:
IAME (Infection, Antimicrobial, Modeling, Evaluation), INSERM UMR1137, University of Paris, Paris, France Emergency Department and EMS, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France
*
Correspondence: Daniel Aiham Ghazali, MD, PhD IAME Research Center, INSERM UMR 1137 University of Paris 16 rue Henri Huchard, B.P. 416 75870 Paris Cedex 18, France Emergency Department and EMS University Hospital of Amiens Rond-Point du Pr Christian Cabrol 80000 Amiens, France E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction:

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2020 guidelines propose an algorithm for in-hospital management of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) based on risk stratification according to clinical, electrocardiographic, and biological data. However, out-of-hospital management is not codified.

Study Objective:

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the role of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-I in out-of-hospital management of NSTEMI by Emergency Medical Services (EMS).

Methods:

This monocentric, retrospective, observational study analyzed the files of all patients having received a troponin assay in the EMS of Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP (Paris region, France) from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. Patients were classified as low risk, high risk, or very high risk according to the ESC 2020 algorithm at the time of their hospital treatment. The relationship between troponin in point-of-care and risk level according to time to onset of pain was analyzed using logistic regression. A search for predictors of risk level was performed using multivariate analysis. A P value <.05 was considered significant.

Results:

Out of 309 patients in the file, 233 were included. Men were 61% and the median age was 63 years. A positive troponin assay was associated with high-risk or very high-risk stratification regardless of the time to onset of pain (P <.0001). Predictive factors for being classified as high or very high risk in hospital were: a history of atrial fibrillation (P = .03), electrocardiogram (ECG) modifications such as negative T wave or ST-segment depression (P <.0001), and positive troponin (P <.0001).

Conclusion:

The use of point-of-care troponin in EMS, combined with clinical and electrical criteria, allows risk stratification of NSTEMI patients from the prehospital management stage and optimization of referral to an appropriate care pathway. Patients classified as low risk should be referred to the emergency department (ED) and patients classified as high risk or very high risk to the cardiac intensive care unit or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) center.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mechanic, OJ, Gavin, M, Grossman, SA. Acute Myocardial Infarction. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, Florida USA: StatPearls Publishing; 2021.Google Scholar
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm). Infarctus du Myocarde. Quand le Cœur est Privé d’Oxygène⋅ https://www.inserm.fr/dossier/infarctus-myocarde/. Updated July 9, 2017. Accessed January 10, 2022.Google Scholar
Ibanez, B, James, S, Agewall, S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017;70(12):1082.Google ScholarPubMed
ARCHITECT System. STAT High-Sensitive Troponin-I. Lake Bluff, Illinois USA: Abbott Laboratories; 2018. G97079R01. https://www.ilexmedical.com/files/PDF/Troponin_ARC.pdf. Updated March 2010. Accessed January 10, 2022.Google Scholar
Collet, J-P, Thiele, H, Barbato, E, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2021;42(14):12891367.10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arslan, F, Damman, P, Zwart, B, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines on acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation. Recommendations and critical appraisal from the Dutch ACS and interventional cardiology working groups. Neth Heart J. 2021;29(11):557565.10.1007/s12471-021-01593-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, AR, Lee, KK, McAllister, DA, et al. Association of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-I concentration with cardiac outcomes in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. JAMA. 2017;318(19):19131924.10.1001/jama.2017.17488CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasmussen, MB, Stengaard, C, Sørensen, JT, et al. Predictive value of routine point-of-care cardiac troponin T measurement for prehospital diagnosis and risk-stratification in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019;8(4):299308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagle, KA, Lim, MJ, Dabbous, OH, et al. A validated prediction model for all forms of acute coronary syndrome estimating the risk of 6-month post-discharge death in an international registry. JAMA. 2004;291(22):27272733.10.1001/jama.291.22.2727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dongen, DN, Tolsma, RT, Fokkert, MJ, et al. Prehospital risk assessment in suspected non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: a prospective observational study. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020;9(1_suppl):512.10.1177/2048872618813846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stopyra, JP, Harper, WS, Higgins, TJ, et al. Prehospital modified HEART score predictive of 30-day adverse cardiac events. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(1):5862.10.1017/S1049023X17007154CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soliman, EZ, Safford, MM, Muntner, P, et al. Atrial fibrillation and the risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(1):107114.10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11912CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benjamin, EJ, Chen, P-S, Bild, DE, et al. Prevention of atrial fibrillation: report from an NHLBI workshop. Circulation. 2009;119(4):606618.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.825380CrossRefGoogle Scholar