Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:35:18.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On-scene Times for Inter-facility Transport of Patients with Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2016

Susan R. Wilcox*
Affiliation:
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina USA
Mark S. Saia
Affiliation:
Boston MedFlight, Bedford, Massachusetts USA
Heather Waden
Affiliation:
Boston MedFlight, Bedford, Massachusetts USA
Susan J. McGahn
Affiliation:
Boston MedFlight, Bedford, Massachusetts USA
Michael Frakes
Affiliation:
Boston MedFlight, Bedford, Massachusetts USA
Suzanne K. Wedel
Affiliation:
Boston MedFlight, Bedford, Massachusetts USA
Jeremy B. Richards
Affiliation:
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina USA
*
Correspondence: Susan R. Wilcox, MD 96 Jonathan Lucas Street Suite 812-CSB Charleston, South Carolina 29425-6300 USA E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction

Inter-facility transport of critically ill patients is associated with a high risk of adverse events, and critical care transport (CCT) teams may spend considerable time at sending institutions preparing patients for transport. The effect of mode of transport and distance to be traveled on on-scene times (OSTs) has not been well-described.

Problem

Quantification of the time required to package patients and complete CCTs based on mode of transport and distance between facilities is important for hospitals and CCT teams to allocate resources effectively.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of OSTs and transport times for patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure transported from October 2009 through December 2012 from sending hospitals to three tertiary care hospitals. Differences among the OSTs and transport times based on the mode of transport (ground, rotor wing, or fixed wing), distance traveled, and intra-hospital pick-up location (emergency department [ED] vs intensive care unit [ICU]) were assessed. Correlations between OSTs and transport times were performed based on mode of transport and distance traveled.

Results

Two hundred thirty-nine charts were identified for review. Mean OST was 42.2 (SD=18.8) minutes, and mean transport time was 35.7 (SD=19.5) minutes. On-scene time was greater than en route time for 147 patients and greater than total trip time for 91. Mean transport distance was 42.2 (SD=35.1) miles. There were no differences in the OST based on mode of transport; however, total transport time was significantly shorter for rotor versus ground, (39.9 [SD=19.9] minutes vs 54.2 [SD=24.7] minutes; P <.001) and for rotor versus fixed wing (84.3 [SD=34.2] minutes; P=0.02). On-scene time in the ED was significantly shorter than the ICU (33.5 [SD=15.7] minutes vs 45.2 [SD=18.8] minutes; P <.001). For all patients, regardless of mode of transportation, there was no correlation between OST and total miles travelled; although, there was a significant correlation between the time en route and distance, as well as total trip time and distance.

Conclusions

In this cohort of critically ill patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure, OST was over 40 minutes and was often longer than the total trip time. On-scene time did not correlate with mode of transport or distance traveled. These data can assist in planning inter-facility transports for both the sending and receiving hospitals, as well as CCT services.

WilcoxSR , SaiaMS , WadenH , McGahnSJ , FrakesM , WedelSK , RichardsJB . On-scene Times for Inter-facility Transport of Patients with Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(3):267–271.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kanter, RK, Tompkins, JM. Adverse events during inter-hospital transport: physiologic deterioration associated with pre-transport severity of illness. Pediatrics. 1989;84(1):43-48.Google Scholar
2. Parmentier-Decrucq, E, Poissy, J, Favory, R, et al. Adverse events during intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients: incidence and risk factors. Ann Intensive Care. 2013;3(1):10-5820-3-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Seymour, CW, Kahn, JM, Schwab, CW, Fuchs, BD. Adverse events during rotary-wing transport of mechanically ventilated patients: a retrospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2008;12(3):R71.Google Scholar
4. Flabouris, A, Runciman, WB, Levings, B. Incidents during out-of-hospital patient transportation. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006;34(2):228-236.Google Scholar
5. Singh, JM, Macdonald, RD, Ahghari, M. Critical events during land-based inter-facility transport. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64(1):9-15.Google Scholar
6. Waydhas, C, Schneck, G, Duswald, KH. Deterioration of respiratory function after intra-hospital transport of critically ill surgical patients. Intensive Care Med. 1995;21(10):784-789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Marx, G, Vangerow, B, Hecker, H, et al. Predictors of respiratory function deterioration after transfer of critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 1998;24(11):1157-1162.Google Scholar
8. Nakstad, AR, Strand, T, Sandberg, M. Landing sites and intubation may influence helicopter Emergency Medical Services on-scene time. J Emerg Med. 2011;40(6):651-657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Youngquist, ST, McIntosh, SE, Swanson, ER, Barton, ED. Air ambulance transport times and advanced cardiac life support interventions during the inter-facility transfer of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010;14(3):292-299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Corfield, AR, Adams, J, Nicholls, R, Hearns, S. On-scene times and critical care interventions for an aeromedical retrieval service. Emerg Med J. 2011;28(7):623-625.Google Scholar
11. Wilcox, SR, Saia, MS, Waden, H, et al. Improved oxygenation after transport in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure. Air Med Journal. In Press.Google Scholar
12. Beckmann, U, Gillies, DM, Berenholtz, SM, Wu, AW, Pronovost, P. Incidents relating to the intra-hospital transfer of critically ill patients. An analysis of the reports submitted to the Australian incident monitoring study in intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(8):1579-1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Singh, JM, MacDonald, RD, Bronskill, SE, Schull, MJ. Incidence and predictors of critical events during urgent air-medical transport. CMAJ. 2009;181(9):579-584.Google Scholar
14. Whiteley, S, Macartney, I, Mark, J, Barratt, HS, Binks, R. Guidelines for the Transport of the Critically Ill Adult. 3rd edition. London, UK: Intensive Care Society; 2011.Google Scholar
15. Wallace, PG, Ridley, SA. ABC of intensive care. Transport of critically ill patients. BMJ. 1999;319(7206):368-371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Ringburg, AN, Spanjersberg, WR, Frankema, SP, Steyerberg, EW, Patka, P, Schipper, IB. Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS): impact on on-scene times. J Trauma. 2007;63(2):258-262.Google Scholar
17. Van Hoving, DJ, Smith, WP, Wallis, LA. Comparison of mean on-scene times: road versus air transportation of critically ill patients in the Western Cape of South Africa. Emerg Med J. 2008;25(3):136-139.Google Scholar
18. Karanicolas, PJ, Bhatia, P, Williamson, J, et al. The fastest route between two points is not always a straight line: an analysis of air and land transfer of non-penetrating trauma patients. J Trauma. 2006;61(2):396-403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Svenson, JE, O'Connor, JE, Lindsay, MB. Is air transport faster? A comparison of air versus ground transport times for inter-facility transfers in a regional referral system. Air Med J. 2006;25(4):170-172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar