Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:28:50.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-Institutional Sources of Assistance following a Disaster: Potential Triage and Treatment Capabilities of Neighborhood-based Preparedness Organizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

David M. Simpson
David M. Simpson*
Affiliation:
Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
*
Associate Director, Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development, University of Louisville, 426 West Bloom Street, Louisville, KY 40208, USA. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The following paper presents an argument for enhancing and encouraging the development of neighborhood-based disaster preparedness organizations, particularly as a potential medical triage and treatment resource following a disaster. First, theresearch context for the utility of non-institutional sources of post-disaster assistance is outlined, followed by the more specific instance of medical triage and treatment. An emerging model of community disaster preparedness training is described, noting the modules that address disaster medicine. Positive contributions and limitations are addressed looking to disaster and non-disaster experiences. While the potential for non-traditional resources to aid immediate post-disaster response is becoming both more common and more accepted, there are a number of recommendations that would improve the usefulness and value, including: 1) integration with existing emergency care infrastructure; 2) standardization of training; 3) use of coordinated drills between public safety organizations, hospitals, and voluntary sectors; and 4) dedication of more funding to assist in the creation and maintenance of programs. Because of the relative infancy of these community-based programs, and the infrequency of large-scale disasters, there is little, if any, pre-post research that can demonstrate a measured impact on response. More pre-disaster baseline data-gathering efforts are needed, combined with post-disaster evaluative research to understand the utility of these non-traditional resources in terms of overall response, and in particular the ability to assist in areas of disaster medicine practice. One also expects that under these kinds of [disaster] conditions, family members, fellow employees, and neighbors will spontaneously try to help each other. This was the case following the Mexico City earthquake where untrained, spontaneous volunteers saved 800 people. However, 100people lost their lives while attempting to save others. This is a high price to pay and is preventable through training.

Resumen

El presente trabajo pretende fortalecer e incentivar el desarrollo de grupos preparadospara desastres basados en la comunidad, particularmente como un recurso potencial para Triage y tratamiento médico después de un desastre. Primero, se delinea la utilidad de recursos no institucionales en la ayuda post-desastre, seguida por la ayuda más especializada de triage y tratamiento medico. Se describe el surgimiento de un modelo de comunidad entrenada en prevención de desastres, enfatizando los módulos de. medicina de desastres. Contribuciones positivas y limitaciones son analizadas en experiencias con y sin desastre. Mientras que el potencial de recursos de ayuda inmediata post desastre no tradicionales se ban vuelto mas comúnmente aceptados, existen numerosas recomendaciones que pueden mejorar la utilidad y valor de los mismos, estas incluyen: 1) Integración con la infraestructura existente en urgencias; 2) La estandarización del entrenamiento; 3) La coordinación de simulacros entre organizaciones de auxilio, hospitales y voluntarios; 4) Otorgamiento de mayores recursos para la creación y mantenimiento de estos programas. Debido a la relativa juventud de los programas comunitarios y la infrecuencia de desastres mayores, hay poca o ninguna investigación que pueda demostrar el impacto en la respuesta. Se requiere una base de datos pre-desastre, combinada con una investigación evaluatoria post-desastre para entender la utilidad de estos recursos no tradicionales en la respuesta total, y en particular la habilidad de la ayuda en el área de medicina de desastre.

Keywords

communitydisasterdisaster medicinedisaster preparednessneighborhoodprehospitalpreparednesstriage
Type
Public Health and Disasters
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 15 , Issue 4: The Role of Public Health in Disaster Medicine , December 2000 , pp. 73 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Drabek, TE: Human System Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings. New York: Springer-Verlag. 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Perry, RW: Disaster preparedness and response among minority citizens. In: Dynes, R. RR; De Marchi, B; Pelandra, C, (eds) Sociology of Disasters: Contribution of Sociology to Disaster Research. Franco Angeli: Milan, Italy. 1987.Google Scholar
3.Faupel, CE, Kelley, SP, Petee, T: The impact of disaster education on household preparedness for Hurricane Hugo. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 1992;10(1):5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Turner, RH, Nigg, JM, Heller-Paz, D: Waiting for Disaster. University of California Press: Los Angeles. 1986.Google Scholar
5.Rosse, WL: Volunteers and post-disaster recovery: A call for community self-sufficiency. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 1993;8(5):261–266.Google Scholar
6.Tierney, KJ: 1989. The social and community aspects of disaster. In: Gist, and Lubin, (eds). Psychosocial Aspects of Disaster. John Wiley and Sons: New York. 1989.Google Scholar
7.Kartez, JD: Emergency planning: An adaptive approach. In: Baseline Data Report. International City Management Association. Washington, DC. 1988; 20, No.5.Google Scholar
8.United States General Accounting Office: Disaster Assistance: Federal, State, and Local Responses to Natural Disasters Need Improvement. General Accounting Office; RCED: #91–43.Google Scholar
9.Kartez, JD, Kelley, WJ: Research-based disaster planning: Conditions for implementation. In: Comfort, LK (ed), Managing Disaster: Strategies and Policy Perspectives. Duke University Press: Durham, NC 1988. pp 126–146.Google Scholar
10.Neal, DM: Volunteer organization responses to the earthquake. In: Bolin, R (ed) The Loma Prieta Earthquake: Studies of Short Term Impacts. Environment and Behavior Monograph #50. University of Colorado Institute of Behavioral Science: Boulder, Colorado. 1990.Google Scholar
11.Neal, DM: The local Red Cross in time of disaster: Characteristics and conditions of organizational effectiveness during the Loma Prieta earthquake and central Texas floods. Journal of Volunteer Administration. 1992;Winter:6–16.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Phillips, BD: The media in disaster threat situations: Some possible relationships between mass media reporting and volunteerism. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 1986;4(3):7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Phillips, BD; Post-Disaster Sheltering and Housing of Hispanics, the Elderly and the Homeless. Final Project Report submitted to the National Science Foundation. 1991.Google Scholar
14.Wenger, DE: Emergent and Volunteer Behavior During Disaster: Research Findings and Planning Implications. Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center, Texas A&M University: College Station, TX: 1992.Google Scholar
15.Wenger, DE, James, T:. The Convergence of Volunteers in a Consensus Crisis: The Case of the 1985 Mexico City Earthquake. Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center, Texas A&M University: College Station, TX: 1990.Google Scholar
16.Dynes, RR; Quarantelli, EL; Wenger, DE: The Organizational and Public Response to the September 1985 Earthquake in Mexico City. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware; Newark, DE: 1988.Google Scholar
17.Holland, CJ; Effective utilization of victim volunteers in the emergency response. In: Proceedings of the International workshop on Earthquake Injury Epidemiology for Mitigation and Response. The Johns Hopkins University: Baltimore, MD. 1989. pp 321–335.Google Scholar
18.Nehnevajsa, J: Volunteering for Emergency Preparedness. Final Report, May 1989. Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington, DC. 1989.Google Scholar
19.Quarantelli, EL: Earthquake Preparedness Citizen Groups: Their Atypical Nature and the Conditions for their Emergence. Preliminary Paper No.87. University of Delaware: Disaster Research Center. 1983b.Google Scholar
20.Turner, R; Kiecolt, J; Goetsch, G: Earthquake Threat: The Human Response in Southern California. University of California, Los Angeles: Institute for Social Science Research. 1981.Google Scholar
21.Simpson, DM: Earthquake Drills and Simulations as Augments to Community-Based Training and Preparedness Programs: Organizational Structure and Utility. Working Paper No. 52-P. Texas A&M University: Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center. 1998.Google Scholar
22.Simpson, DM: Community Models of Disaster Preparedness. In: Ingleton, J (ed), Natural Disaster Management. Leicester, England: Tudor Rose Publishing. 1999.Google Scholar
23.Simpson, DM: Community emergency response training (CERT) programs in Florida: Interviews with programs managers. Working Paper S-01. The University of Louisville: Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development. 2000.Google Scholar
24.Simpson, DM: Dealing with Un-CERT-ainty: The rise of community emergency response training programs as a new social organization. Working Paper S-02. The University of Louisville: Center for Hazards Research and Policy Development. 2000.Google Scholar
25.Albany, City of: Draft General Plan and Draft EIR. City of Albany: Planning Department. November 1991.Google Scholar
26.Simpson, DM: Risk and disaster: Arguments for a community-based planning approach. Berkeley Planning Journal Fall 1992;7.Google Scholar
27.Federal Emergency Management Agency: Community Emergency Response Team: Student Training Manual. Emergency Management Institute, National Emergency Training Center, Emmitsburg, Maryland. 1994.Google Scholar
28.Heckman, JD (ed): Emergency Care and Transportation of the Sick and Injured. 6th Ed.American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons: Park Ridge, Ill. 1995.Google Scholar
29.Lowder, E: Comparing the Northridge and Kobe Experiences. In: The Medical and Rescue Aspects of a Major Earthquake. Conference Proceedings, Petaluma, California. October 1995. pp 1–14.Google Scholar
30.Federal Emergency Management Agency: Directory of Civilian Emergency Response Training Programs by State. Retrieved 08 April 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.fema.gov/emi/cert/dir.htm.Google Scholar
31.Los Angeles Fire Department. Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Training. Retrieved 08 April 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.LAFD.org/cert.htm.Google Scholar
32.Isenberger, S: CERT in action. The Connection (on-line newsletter) 1999; 2(1) Retrieved from the World Wide Web on 08 April 2000. http://www.naem.com/connection/articlesl/emi.html.Google Scholar
31.Federal Emergency Management Agency: Community Emergency Response Team: Instructor Manual. Emergency Management Institute, National Emergency Training Center, Emmitsburg, Maryland. 1994.Google Scholar