Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T11:13:05.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Mixed-methods Pilot Study of Disaster Preparedness and Resiliency Among Faith-based Organizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2014

Valerie M. Muller ,
Rita V. Burke ,
Bridget M. Berg ,
Ann C. Lin  and
Jeffrey S. Upperman
Valerie M. Muller
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California USA
Rita V. Burke
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California USA Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California USA
Bridget M. Berg
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California USA
Ann C. Lin
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California USA
Jeffrey S. Upperman*
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California USA Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California USA
*
Correspondence: Jeffrey S. Upperman, MD Keck School of Medicine Pediatric Surgery Children's Hospital Los Angeles University of Southern California 4650 Sunset Boulevard Mailstop #72 Los Angeles, CA 90027 USA E-mail [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

Faith-based organizations represent a source of stability and are an established presence in a community. They frequently serve their community following disasters. They are not formally included or identified as a disaster resource; thus, there is an opportunity to increase the effectiveness with which faith-based organizations prepare for and respond to disasters.

Problem

This pilot study aimed to assess perceptions of the level of disaster preparedness and resiliency among faith-based organizations as a first step in understanding how to improve disaster preparedness and resiliency among these organizations and their communities.

Methods

Survey and semi-structured interviews were conducted with six faith-based organizations, one with a leader and one with a staff member. Frequency distributions of survey questions were obtained. Interviews were transcribed and thematic analysis was supported by analytical software, ATLAS. ti.

Results

Results of the survey indicated strong social networks among congregation and community members. However, half of the members indicated that they did not socialize often with other races and other neighborhoods. Additionally, trust of other groups of people was generally low. Themes that emerged from qualitative analysis were: (1) perceived disaster preparedness and resiliency; (2) barriers to community preparedness and resiliency; (3) lessons learned from past disasters; (4) social services and networks; and (5) willingness to be prepared.

Conclusions

The results suggest that there is a need for interventions to improve disaster preparedness and resiliency among faith-based organizations.

MullerV , BurkeR , BergB , LinA , UppermanJ . A Mixed-methods Pilot Study of Disaster Preparedness and Resiliency Among Faith-based Organizations. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(2):1-7.

Keywords

disaster preparednessfaith-based organizationsmixed-methods researchresiliency
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 127 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

1. Falkiner, L. Impact analysis of the Canadian Red Cross Expect the Unexpected Program. Retrieved August. 2003;15:2011.Google Scholar
2. Paton, D, McClure, J, Bürgelt, PT. Natural hazard resilience: The role of individual and household preparedness. Disaster resilience: An integrated approach. 2006:105-127.Google Scholar
3. Walter, J. World disasters report 2004: Focus on community resilience. Kumarian Bloomfield, CT; 2004.Google Scholar
4. Cutter, SL, Barnes, L, Berry, M, et al. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change. 2008;18(4):598-606.Google Scholar
5. Born, CT, Briggs, SM, Ciraulo, DL, et al. Disasters and mass casualties: I. General principles of response and management. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2007;15(7):388-396.Google Scholar
6. Guha-Sapir, D, Vos, F, Below, R, Ponserre, S. Annual Disaster statistical review 2010. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. 2011.Google Scholar
7. CDC. Public Health Workbook to Define, Locate and Reach Special, Vulnerable, and At-Risk Populations in an Emergency. http://www.bt.cdc.gov/workbook/pdf/ph_workbookFINAL.pdf. Accessed March 6, 2013.Google Scholar
8. DeHaven, MJ, Hunter, IB, Wilder, L, Walton, JW, Berry, J. Health programs in faith-based organizations: are they effective? American Journal of Public Health. 2004;94(6):1030.Google Scholar
9. Campbell, MK, Hudson, MA, Resnicow, K, Blakeney, N, Paxton, A, Baskin, M. Church-based health promotion interventions: evidence and lessons learned. Annu. Rev. Public Health. 2007;28:213-234.Google Scholar
10. Sutherland, M, Hale, CD, Harris, GJ. Community health promotion: the church as partner. The Journal of Primary Prevention. 1995;16(2):201-216.Google Scholar
11. Putnam, RD. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster; 2001.Google Scholar
12. Putnam, RD. Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy. 1995;6(1):65-78.Google Scholar
13. Aldrich, DP. Fixing recovery: social capital in post-crisis resilience. Journal of Homeland Security. 2010.Google Scholar
14. Aldrich, DP. The power of people: social capital's role in recovery from the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Natural hazards. 2010.Google Scholar
15. Asomugha, CN, Derose, KP, Lurie, N. Faith-based organizations, science, and the pursuit of health. Journal of health care for the poor and underserved. 2011;22(1):50.Google Scholar
16. Stajura, M, Glik, D, Eisenman, D, Prelip, M, Martel, A, Sammartinova, J. Perspectives of Community-and Faith-Based Organizations about Partnering with Local Health Departments for Disasters. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2012;9(7):2293-2311.Google Scholar
17. Ekanayake, S, Prince, M, Sumathipala, A, Siribaddana, S, Morgan, C. “We lost all we had in a second”: coping with grief and loss after a natural disaster. World Psychiatry. 2013;12(1):69-75.Google Scholar
18. Saguaro Seminar: Civic Engagement in America - Harvard Kennedy School of Government. Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey. 2006; http://www.hks.harvard.edu/saguaro/measurement/measurement.htm#benchmark. Accessed June 18, 2012.Google Scholar
19. Flory, R, Sager, R. Community and Congregations Project. Los Angeles, CA; 2010.Google Scholar
20. Glaser, BG, Strauss, AL. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter; 1967.Google Scholar
21. Aronson, J. A Pragmatic View of Thematic Analysis. The Qualitative Report [serial online]. 1994;2(1):Available from: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/BackIssues/QR2-1/aronson.html. Accessed July 21, 2008.Google Scholar
22. Ellison, CG, Levin, JS. The religion-health connection: Evidence, theory, and future directions. Health Education & Behavior. 1998;25(6):700-720.Google Scholar
23. Maton, KI, Wells, EA. Religion as a community resource for wellbeing: prevention, healing, and empowerment pathways. Journal of Social Issues. 2010;51(2):177-193.Google Scholar
24. Diekman, ST, Kearney, SP, O Neil, ME, Mack, KA. Qualitative study of homeowners’ emergency preparedness: Experiences, perceptions, and practices. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 2007;22(6):494.Google Scholar
25. Berke, PR, Campanella, TJ. Planning for postdisaster resiliency. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2006;604(1):192-207.Google Scholar
26. Olshansky, RB, Kartez, JD. Managing land use to build resilience. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC, 1998.Google Scholar
27. Nelson, AC, French, SP. Plan quality and mitigating damage from natural disasters: A case study of the Northridge earthquake with planning policy considerations. Journal of the American Planning Association. 2002;68(2):194-207.Google Scholar
28. Mader, GG. Enduring land-use planning lessons from the 1971 San Fernando earthquake. Earthquake spectra. 1997;13(1):45-53.Google Scholar
29. Burby, RJ, May, PJ. Making Governments Plan: State Experiments in Managing Land Use. Johns Hopkins University Press; 1997.Google Scholar
30. Berke, P, Beatley, T. Planning for Earthquakes: Risk, Politics, and Policy. Johns Hopkins University Press; 1991.Google Scholar
31. Valente, TW, Fujimoto, K, Chou, CP, Spruijt-Metz, D. Adolescent affiliations and adiposity: a social network analysis of friendships and obesity. The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. Aug 2009;45(2):202-204.Google Scholar
32. Fujimoto, K, Valente, TW. Decomposing the components of friendship and friends’ influence on adolescent drinking and smoking. The Journal of adolescent health: official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. Aug 2012;51(2):136-143.Google Scholar
33. McCulloch, A. An examination of social capital and social disorganisation in neighbourhoods in the British household panel study. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(7):1425-1438.Google Scholar
34. Baum, FE, Ziersch, AM, Zhang, G, Osborne, K. Do perceived neighbourhood cohesion and safety contribute to neighbourhood differences in health? Health Place. 2009;15(4):925-934.Google Scholar
35. Veenstra, G, Luginaah, I, Wakefield, S, Birch, S, Eyles, J, Elliott, S. Who you know, where you live: social capital, neighbourhood and health. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(12):2799-2818.Google Scholar
36. Wineman, NV, Braun, BI, Barbera, JA, Loeb, JM. Assessing the integration of health center and community emergency preparedness and response planning. Disaster medicine and public health preparedness. 2007;1(2):96.Google Scholar
37. Paige, S, Jones, M, D'Ambrosio, L, et al. Strengthening Community Partnerships with Local Public Health through Regional Pandemic Influenza Exercises. Public Health Reports. 2010;125(3):488.Google Scholar
38. Kapucu, N. Collaborative emergency management: better community organising, better public preparedness and response. Disasters. 2008;32(2):239-262.Google Scholar
39. Manyena, SB. The concept of resilience revisited. Disasters. 2006;30(4):434-450.Google Scholar