Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:44:24.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Medical Support during the European Union Summit in Gothenburg, Sweden, June 2001

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Kristina M.C. Johnsson ,
Per A. Örtenwall ,
Anne-Lii H. Kivi  and
Annika H.E. Hedelin
Kristina M.C. Johnsson*
Affiliation:
Centre for Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Per A. Örtenwall
Affiliation:
Centre for Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Anne-Lii H. Kivi
Affiliation:
Centre for Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Annika H.E. Hedelin
Affiliation:
Centre for Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
*
Dr. Kristina Johnsson Centre for Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, PKMC University of Gothenburg Regionens Hus, 405 44 Gothenburg, Sweden E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Several factors are important for the number and severity of medical emergencies during mass-gatherings. The risk of violence, the size and mobility of the crowd, the type of event, weather, and duration of the event all influence the outcome. During the European Union (EU) Summit, from 15–16 June 2001 in Gothenburg, Sweden, approximately 50,000 people participated in 43 protest marches, some which included 15,000 participants. Clashes between police and the protesters occurred.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to analyze the amount and character of injuries as well as the medical complaints in relation to the EU Summit. In addition, the aim of this study was to describe the organization and function of the healthcare services provided during the meeting.

Methods:

This study is based on the medical records of patients presenting with injuries and other types of medical emergencies at the healthcare stations during the Summit.

Results:

In total, 143 patients sought medical care. Fifty-three (37.1%) were police officers. Most patients had minor complaints, but a few were seriously injured.The Patient Presentation Rate (PPR) was 2.7. Nine victims were hospitalized as high priority.

Conclusion:

The PPR for the EU Summit was 2.7, which is in the same range as previously reported from other mass-gatherings.

Keywords

command centercrowddemonstrationsfirst aidinjuriesmedical emergencymass-gatheringplanpoliceriotweather
Type
Brief Report
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , August 2006 , pp. 282 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Chused, TM, Cohn, CK, Schneider, E, Winfield, JB: Medical care during the November 1969 antiwar demonstrations in Washington, DC: An experience in crowd medicine. Arch Intern Med 1971;127:67–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Michael, JA, Barbera, JA: Mass-gathering medical care: A twenty-five year review. Prehosp Disast Med 1997;12:305–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Arbon, P, Bridgewater, FHG, Smith, C: Mass-gathering medicine: A predic-tive model for patient presentation and transport rates. Prehosp Disast Med 2001;16:150–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Nordberg, M: EMS and mass-gatherings. Emerg Med Serv 1990;19:46–57.Google ScholarPubMed
5.Bowdish, GE, Cordell, WH, Bock, HC, Vukov, LF: Using regression analysis to predict emergency patient volume at the Indianapolis 500 mile race. Ann Emerg Med 1992;121:1200–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.DeLorenzo, RA: Mass-gathering medicine: A review. Prehosp Disast Med 1997:12:68–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Sanders, AB, Criss, E, Steckl, P, Meislin, HW, Raife, J, Allen, DL: An analysis of medical care at mass-gatherings. Ann Emerg Med 1986;15:515–519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Flabouris, A, Bridgewater, FHG: An analysis of demand for first-aid care at a major public event. Prehosp Disast Med 1996;11:48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Janchar, T, Samaddar, C, Milzmann, D: The mosh pit experience: Emergency medical care for concert injuries. Am J Emerg Med 2000;28:62–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Shelton, S, Haire, S: Medical care for mass-gatherings at collegiate football games. South Med J 1997;90:1081–1083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Leonard, RB: Medical support for mass-gatherings. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1996;14:383–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Hodgetts, TJ, Cooke, MW: The largest mass-gathering. BMJ 1999;318:957–958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Parrillo, SJ: Medical care at mass-gatherings: Considerations for physician involvement. Prehosp Disast Med 1995;10:273–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed