Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:21:45.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maggot Debridement Therapy in Disaster Medicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2015

Frank Stadler ,
Ramon Z. Shaban  and
Peter Tatham
Frank Stadler*
Affiliation:
Department of International Business and Asian Studies, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Ramon Z. Shaban
Affiliation:
Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia Department of Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, Gold Coast University Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, Australia
Peter Tatham
Affiliation:
Department of International Business and Asian Studies, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
*
Correspondence: Frank Stadler, BSc Hon Griffith Business School Department of International Business and Asian Studies Gold Coast Campus Griffith University Queensland, Australia 4222 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

When disaster strikes, the number of patients requiring treatment can be overwhelming. In low-income countries, resources to assist the injured in a timely fashion may be limited. As a consequence, necrosis and wound infection in disaster patients is common and frequently leads to adverse health outcomes such as amputations, chronic wounds, and loss of life. In such compromised health care environments, low-tech and cheap wound care options are required that are in ready supply, easy to use, and have multiple therapeutic benefits. Maggot debridement therapy (MDT) is one such wound care option and may prove to be an invaluable tool in the treatment of wounds post-disaster.

Discussion

This report provides an overview of the wound burden experienced in various types of disaster, followed by a discussion of current treatment approaches, and the role MDT may play in the treatment of complex wounds in challenging health care conditions. Maggot debridement therapy removes necrotic and devitalized tissue, controls wound infection, and stimulates wound healing. These properties suggest that medicinal maggots could assist health care professionals in the debridement of disaster wounds, to control or prevent infection, and to prepare the wound bed for reconstructive surgery. Maggot debridement therapy-assisted wound care would be led by health care workers rather than physicians, which would allow the latter to focus on reconstructive and other surgical interventions. Moreover, MDT could provide a larger window for time-critical interventions, such as fasciotomies to treat compartment syndrome and amputations in case of life-threatening wound infection.

Recommendations

There are social, medical, and logistic hurdles to overcome before MDT can become widely available in disaster medical aid. Thus, research is needed to further demonstrate the utility of MDT in Disaster Medicine. There is also a need for reliable MDT logistics and supply chain networks. Integration with other disaster management activities will also be essential.

Conclusions

In the aftermath of disasters, MDT could play an important role facilitating timely and efficient medical treatment and improving patient outcomes. Existing social, medical, and logistic barriers will need to be overcome for MDT to be mainstreamed in Disaster Medicine.

StadlerF , ShabanRZ , TathamP . Maggot Debridement Therapy in Disaster Medicine. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(1):79–84.

Keywords

disasterinfectioninjurymaggot debridement therapywound care
Type
Special Reports
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 79 - 84
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Zhang, L, Zhang, Y, Liu, Z, et al. Emergency medical rescue efforts after a major earthquake: lessons from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Lancet. 2012;379(9818):853-861.Google Scholar
2. Republic of the Philippines. NDRRMC Update - SitRep No. 108 Effects of Typhoon "Yolanda" (Haiyan). http://reliefwebint/sites/reliefwebint/files/resources/NDRRMC%20Update%20-%20Sitrep%20No%20108%20re%20TY%20Yolanda%20-%2003%20April%202014pdf. Accessed February 18, 2014.Google Scholar
3. Jobe, K. Disaster relief in post-earthquake Haiti: unintended consequences of humanitarian volunteerism. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2011;9(1):1-5.Google Scholar
4. Phalkey, R, Reinhardt, JD, Marx, M. Injury epidemiology after the 2001 Gujarat earthquake in India: a retrospective analysis of injuries treated at a rural hospital in the Kutch district immediately after the disaster. Glob Health Action. 2011;4:7196-7199.Google Scholar
5. Chapin, E, Daniels, A, Elias, R, et al. Impact of the 2007 Ica earthquake on health facilities and health service provision in southern Peru. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24(4):326-332.Google Scholar
6. Chu, K, Stokes, C, Trelles, M, et al. Improving effective surgical delivery in humanitarian disasters: lessons from Haiti. PLoS Med. 2011;8(4):e1001025.Google Scholar
7. Missair, A, Pretto, EA, Visan, A, et al. A matter of life or limb? A review of traumatic injury patterns and anesthesia techniques for disaster relief after major earthquakes. Anesth Analg. 2013;117(4):934-941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Prasartritha, T, Tungsiripat, R, Warachit, P. The revisit of 2004 tsunami in Thailand: characteristics of wounds. Int Wound J. 2008;5(1):8-19.Google Scholar
9. Doocy, S, Jacquet, G, Cherewick, M, et al. The injury burden of the 2010 Haiti earthquake: a stratified cluster survey. Injury. 2013;44(6):842-847.Google Scholar
10. Baer, WS. The classic: the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis with the maggot (larva of the blow fly). Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(4):920-944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Sherman, RA, Hall, MJ, Thomas, S. Medicinal maggots: an ancient remedy for some contemporary afflictions. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:55-81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Whitaker, IS, Twine, C, Whitaker, MJ, et al. Larval therapy from antiquity to the present day: mechanisms of action, clinical applications, and future potential. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83(980):409-413.Google Scholar
13. Church, JCT, Courtenay, M. Maggot debridement therapy for chronic wounds. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2002;1(2):129-134.Google Scholar
14. Church, JCT. The traditional use of maggots in wound healing, and the development of larva therapy (biosurgery) in modern medicine. J Altern Complement Med. 1996;2(4):525-527.Google Scholar
15. Kruglikova, AA, Chernysh, SI. Surgical maggots and the history of their medical use. Entomological Review. 2013;93(6):667-674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Pechter, EA, Sherman, RA. Maggot therapy: the surgical metamorphosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72(4):567-570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Wollina, U, Karte, K, Herold, C, et al. Biosurgery in wound healing - the renaissance of maggot therapy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000;14(4):285-289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Čičková, H, Čambal, M, Kozánek, M, et al. Growth and survival of bagged Lucilia sericata maggots in wounds of patients undergoing maggot debridement therapy. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013. DOI: 10.1155/2013/192149.Google Scholar
19. US Army. ST 31-91B US Army Special Forces Medical Handbook. Boulder, Colorado: Paladin Press; 1982; 22-1 to 22-4.Google Scholar
20. Heitkamp, RA, Peck, GW, Kirkup, BC. Maggot debridement therapy in modern army medicine: perceptions and prevalence. Mil Med. 2012;177(11):1411-1416.Google Scholar
21. Peck, GW, Kirkup, BC. Biocompatibility of antimicrobials to maggot debridement therapy: medical maggots Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae) exhibit tolerance to clinical maximum doses of antimicrobials. J Med Entomol. 2012;49(5):1137-1143.Google Scholar
22. Peck, G, Helgeson, SM, Powell, ED, et al. Airworthiness testing of medical maggots. Mil Med. 2015;180(5):591-596.Google Scholar
23. Glassberg, E, Nadler, R, Erlich, T, et al. A decade of advances in military trauma care. Scand J Surg. 2014;103:126-131.Google Scholar
24. Clover, AJP, Jemec, B, Redmond, AD. The extent of soft tissue and musculoskeletal injuries after earthquakes; describing a role for reconstructive surgeons in an emergency response. World J Surg. 2014;38:2543-2550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Doocy, S, Daniels, A, Packer, C, et al. The human impact of earthquakes: a historical review of events 1980-2009 and systematic literature review. PLoS Currents. 2013;5. DOI: 10.1371/currents.dis.67bd14fe457f1db0b5433a8ee20fb833 Google ScholarPubMed
26. Doocy, S, Daniels, A, Dick, A, et al. The human impact of tsunamis: a historical review of events 1900-2009 and systematic literature review. PLoS Currents. 2013;5. DOI: 10.1371/currents.dis.40f3c5cf61110a0fef2f9a25908cd795.Google ScholarPubMed
27. Ciottone, GR, Elsevier. Disaster Medicine. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA: Elsevier/Mosby; 2006.Google Scholar
28. Tempark, T, Lueangarun, S, Chatproedprai, S, et al. Flood‐related skin diseases: a literature review. Int J Dermatol. 2013;52(10):1168-1176.Google Scholar
29. Doocy, S, Dick, A, Daniels, A, et al. The human impact of tropical cyclones: a historical review of events 1980-2009 and systematic literature review. PLoS Currents. 2013;5. DOI: 10.1371/currents.dis.2664354a5571512063ed29d25ffbce74 Google Scholar
30. Benedict, K, Park, BJ. Invasive fungal infections after natural disasters. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(3):349-355.Google Scholar
31. Edsander-Nord, Å. Wound complications from the tsunami disaster: a reminder of indications for delayed closure. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2008;34(5):457-464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Garzoni, C, Emonet, S, Legout, L, et al. Atypical infections in tsunami survivors. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(10):1591-1593.Google Scholar
33. Turris, SA, Lund, A, Bowles, RR. An analysis of mass-casualty incidents in the setting of mass gatherings and special events. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2014;8(2):143-149.Google Scholar
34. Wachira, BW, Smith, W. Major incidents in Kenya: the case for emergency services development and training. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(2):170-173.Google Scholar
35. Arturson, G. The tragedy of San Juanico-the most severe LPG disaster in history. Burns Incl Therm Inj. 1987;13(2):87-102.Google Scholar
36. Dechy, N, Bourdeaux, T, Ayrault, N, et al. First lessons of the Toulouse ammonium nitrate disaster, 21st September 2001, AZF plant, France. J Hazard Mater. 2004;111(1-3):131-138.Google Scholar
37. Woltering, HP, Schneider, BM. Great damage event of the Dutch Enschede on May 13th, 2000. Unfallchirurg. 2002;105(11):961-967.Google Scholar
38. Kumar, P. Fire disaster following LPG tanker explosion at Chala in Kannur (Kerala, India): August 27, 2012. Burns. 2013;39(7):1479-1487.Google Scholar
39. Carlson, LC, Rogers, TT, Kamara, TB, et al. Petroleum pipeline explosions in sub-Saharan Africa: a comprehensive systematic review of the academic and lay literature. Burns. 2015;41(3):497-501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40. Fadeyibi, IO, Omosebi, DT, Jewo, PI, et al. Mass burns disaster in Abule-egba, Lagos, Nigeria from a petroleum pipeline explosion fire. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2009;22(2):97-103.Google Scholar
41. Goffman, TE. Nuclear terrorism and the problem of burns. Am J Emerg Med. 2011;29(2):224-228.Google Scholar
42. Knebel, AR, Coleman, CN, Cliffer, KD, et al. Allocation of scarce resources after a nuclear detonation: setting the context. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5(Suppl 1):S20-S31.Google Scholar
43. Hammond, E, Shaban, RZ, Holzhauser, K, et al. An Exploratory Study to Examine the Phenomenon and Practice of Ambulance Ramping at Hospitals within the Queensland Health Southern Districts and the Queensland Ambulance Service. Queensland, Australia: Griffith University & Queensland Government – Report; 2011.Google Scholar
44. Matsunari, Y, Yoshimoto, N. Comparison of rescue and relief activities within 72 hours of the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(6):536-542.Google Scholar
45. Kartchner, K, Larsen, J. Stanford Security Studies: On Limited Nuclear War in the 21st Century. Redwood City, California USA: Stanford University Press; 2014.Google Scholar
46. Radchuk, A. The great nuclear game of the 21st century: disarmament or war? Security Index: A Russian Journal on International Security. 2010;16(4):19-43.Google Scholar
47. Ross, JR, Case, C, Confer, D, et al. Radiation injury treatment network (RITN): health care professionals preparing for a mass casualty radiological or nuclear incident. Int J Radiat Biol. 2011;87(8):748-753.Google Scholar
48. Williams, G, O'Malley, M. Surgical considerations in the management of combined radiation blast injury casualties caused by a radiological dirty bomb. Injury. 2010;41(9):943-947.Google Scholar
49. Wolbarst, AB, Wiley, AL Jr., Nemhauser, JB, et al. Medical response to a major radiologic emergency: a primer for medical and public health practitioners. Radiology. 2010;254(3):660-677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50. Health Quality. Management of chronic pressure ulcers: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(3):1-203.Google Scholar
51. Smith, RM, Dyer, GSM, Antonangeli, K, et al. Disaster triage after the Haitian earthquake. Injury. 2012;43(11):1811-1815.Google Scholar
52. Sato, T, Ichioka, S. Pressure ulcer occurrence following the Great East Japan Earthquake: observations from a disaster medical assistance team. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2012;58(4):70-75.Google Scholar
53. Terterov, S, Taghva, A, MacDougall, M, et al. Posttraumatic human cerebral myiasis. World Neurosurg. 2010;73(5):557-559.Google Scholar
54. Lindsay, R, Stancil, J, Ray, JM. Myiasis of facial wounds by Cochliomyia hominivorax sustained in a natural disaster in Haiti. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;143(4):595-596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55. Roudiere, L, Jean-Pierre, H, Comte, C, et al. Isolation of Schineria sp. from a man. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13(4):659-661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56. Sever, MS, Erek, E, Vanholder, R, et al. Clinical findings in the renal victims of a catastrophic disaster: the Marmara earthquake. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(11):1942-1949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57. Ritenour, AE, Dorlac, WC, Fang, R, et al. Complications after fasciotomy revision and delayed compartment release in combat patients. J Trauma. 2008;64(2):S153-S162.Google Scholar
58. Finkelstein, JA, Hunter, GA, Hu, RW. Lower limb compartment syndrome: course after delayed fasciotomy. J Trauma. 1996;40(3):342-344.Google Scholar
59. Duman, H, Kulahci, Y, Sengezer, M. Fasciotomy in crush injury resulting from prolonged pressure in an earthquake in Turkey. Emerg Med J. 2003;20(3):251-252.Google Scholar
60. Greaves, I, Porter, KM. Consensus statement on crush injury and crush syndrome. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2004;12(1):47-52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61. MacDougall, KM, Rodgers, FR. A case study using larval therapy in the community setting. Br J Nurs. 2004;13(5):255-260.Google Scholar
62. Hwang, JH, Modi, HN, Suh, SW, et al. Maggot debridement therapy for postsurgical wound infection in scoliosis: a case series in five patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(4):313-319.Google Scholar
63. Saziye, K, Mustafa, C, Ilker, U, et al. Comparison of vacuum‐assisted closure device and conservative treatment for fasciotomy wound healing in ischaemia‐reperfusion syndrome: preliminary results. Int Wound J. 2011;8(3):229-236.Google Scholar
64. Eid, A, Elsoufy, M. Shoelace wound closure for the management of fracture-related fasciotomy wounds. ISRN Orthop. 2012;6. DOI: 10.5402/2012/528382 Google Scholar
65. Matt, SE, Johnson, LS, Shupp, JW, et al. Management of fasciotomy wounds - does the dressing matter? Am Surg. 2011;77(12):1656-1660.Google Scholar
66. Steenvoorde, P, Jacobi, CE, Oskam, J. Maggot debridement therapy: free-range or contained? An in-vivo study. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2005;18(8):430-435.Google Scholar
67. Thomas, S, Wynn, K, Fowler, T, et al. The effect of containment on the properties of sterile maggots. Br J Nurs. 2002;11(12):S21-S28.Google Scholar
68. Chan, QE, Hussain, MA, Milovic, V. Eating out of the hand, maggots - friend or foe? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(8):1116-1118.Google Scholar
69. Husain, ZS, Fallat, LM. Maggot therapy for wound debridement in a traumatic foot-degloving injury: a case report. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003;42(6):371-376.Google Scholar
70. Mumcuoglu, KY, Ingber, A, Gilead, L, et al. Maggot therapy for the treatment of intractable wounds. Int J Dermatol. 1999;38(8):623-627.Google Scholar
71. Doung-ngern, P, Vatanaprasan, T, Chungpaibulpatana, J, et al. Infections and treatment of wounds in survivors of the 2004 tsunami in Thailand. Int Wound J. 2009;6(5):347-354.Google Scholar
72. Fenn-Smith, P. Case study: maggot debridement therapy. Wound Practice & Research. 2008;16(4):169-170.Google Scholar
73. Chaffey, R. Case study: larval therapy for an infected insect bite. World Wide Wounds. 1997; http://www.worldwidewounds.com/1997/october/LarvalTherapy/LarvalCaseStudy.html. Accessed February 18, 2014.Google Scholar
74. Sherman, RA. Maggot versus conservative debridement therapy for the treatment of pressure ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2002;10(4):208-214.Google Scholar
75. Atiyeh, B, Gunn, SW, Dibo, S. Primary triage of mass burn casualties with associated severe traumatic injuries. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2013;26(1):48-52.Google Scholar
76. Jeng, J, Gibran, N, Peck, M. Burn care in disaster and other austere settings. Surg Clin North Am. 2014;94(4):893-907.Google Scholar
77. Branski, LK, Al-Mousawi, A, Rivero, H, et al. Emerging infections in burns. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2009;10(5):389-397.Google Scholar
78. Struck, MF, Gille, J. Fungal infections in burns: a comprehensive review. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2013;26(3):147-153.Google Scholar
79. Kennedy, P, Brammah, S, Wills, E. Burns, biofilm, and a new appraisal of burn wound sepsis. Burns. 2010;36(1):49-56.Google Scholar
80. Hassen, AF, Khalifa, SB, Raddaoui, K, et al. Risk factors for nosocomial infection in pediatric burn patients. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2012;31(7-8):591-595.Google Scholar
81. Edwards, J. Larval therapy in full thickness burns. Journal of Community Nursing. 2006;20(10):33-38.Google Scholar
82. Namias, N, Varela, JE, Varas, RP, et al. Biodebridement: a case report of maggot therapy for limb salvage after fourth-degree burns. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2000;21(3):254-257.Google Scholar
83. Thornton, D, Berry, M, Ralston, D. Case report: maggot therapy in an acute burn. World Wide Wounds. 2002; http://www.worldwidewounds.com/2002/august/Thornton/LarvalTherapyAcuteBurn.html. Accessed February 18, 2014.Google Scholar
84. Akhtar, N, Abdel-Rehim, S, Rodrigues, J, et al. The use of larvae therapy to debride full thickness burns in the anaesthetically unfit patient: the Nottingham experience. Burns. 2011;37(6):e44-e49.Google Scholar
85. Li, Q, Lu, R, Huo, R, et al. Maggots of musca domestica in treatment of acute intractable wound. Surgery. 2009;145(1):122-123.Google Scholar
86. Felder, JM 3rd, Hechenbleikner, E, Jordan, M, et al. Increasing the options for management of large and complex chronic wounds with a scalable, closed-system dressing for maggot therapy. J Burn Care Res. 2012;33(3):e169-e175.Google Scholar