Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T06:02:12.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving the Appropriateness of Advanced Life Support Teams’ Dispatch: A Before-After Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2021

Lorenzo Gamberini ,
Cosimo Picoco ,
Donatella Del Giudice ,
Corrado Zenesini ,
Marco Tartaglione Open the ORCID record for Marco Tartaglione [Opens in a new window] ,
Carlo Coniglio ,
Federico Semeraro ,
Fabrizio Bizzi ,
Stefano Santini  and
Giovanni Gordini
Lorenzo Gamberini
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Prehospital Emergency, Maggiore Hospital Carlo Alberto Pizzardi, Bologna, Italy
Cosimo Picoco
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Prehospital Emergency, Maggiore Hospital Carlo Alberto Pizzardi, Bologna, Italy
Donatella Del Giudice
Affiliation:
Ospedale Maggiore Carlo Alberto Pizzardi, Emergency Department, Regional Program, Bologna, Italy
Corrado Zenesini
Affiliation:
IRCCS, Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Marco Tartaglione*
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Prehospital Emergency, Maggiore Hospital Carlo Alberto Pizzardi, Bologna, Italy
Carlo Coniglio
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Prehospital Emergency, Maggiore Hospital Carlo Alberto Pizzardi, Bologna, Italy
Federico Semeraro
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Prehospital Emergency, Maggiore Hospital Carlo Alberto Pizzardi, Bologna, Italy
Fabrizio Bizzi
Affiliation:
EMS 118 Dispatch Center, Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy
Stefano Santini
Affiliation:
EMS 118 Dispatch Center, Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy
Giovanni Gordini
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Prehospital Emergency, Maggiore Hospital Carlo Alberto Pizzardi, Bologna, Italy
*
Correspondence: Marco Tartaglione, MD, Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency Medical Services, Carlo Alberto Pizzardi Hospital, Largo Nigrisoli 2 - 40133 Bologna, Italy, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background and Importance:

The dispatch of Advanced Life Support (ALS) teams in Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is still a hardly studied aspect of prehospital emergency logistics. In 2015, the dispatch algorithm of Emilia Est Emergency Operation Centre (EE-EOC) was implemented and the dispatch of ALS teams was changed from primary to secondary based on triage of dispatched vehicles for high-priority interventions when teams with Immediate Life Support (ILS) skills were dispatched.

Objectives:

This study aimed to evaluate the effects on the appropriateness of ALS teams’ intervention and their employment time, and to compare sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm implementation.

Design:

This was a retrospective before-after observational study.

Settings and Participants:

Primary dispatches managed by EE-EOC involving ambulances and/or ALS teams were included. Two groups were created on the basis of the years of intervention (2013-2014 versus 2017-2018).

Intervention:

A switch from primary to secondary dispatch of ALS teams in case of high-priority dispatches managed by ILS teams was implemented.

Outcomes:

Appropriateness of ALS team intervention, total task time of ALS vehicles, and sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm were reviewed.

Results:

The study included 242,501 emergency calls that generated 56,567 red code dispatches. The new algorithm significantly increased global sensitivity and specificity of the system in terms of recognition of potential need of ALS intervention and the specificity of primary ALS dispatch. The appropriateness of ALS intervention was significantly increased; total tasking time per day for ALS and the number of critical dispatches without ALS available were reduced.

Conclusion:

The revision of the dispatch criteria and the extension of the two-tiered dispatch for ALS teams significantly increased the appropriateness of ALS intervention and reduced both the global tasking time and the number of high-priority dispatches without ALS teams available.

Keywords

emergency medical dispatchEmergency Medical Servicesmedical order entry systems
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , April 2021 , pp. 195 - 201
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fevang, E, Lockey, D, Thompson, J, Lossius, HM; Torpo, Research Collaboration. The top five research priorities in physician-provided pre-hospital critical care: a consensus report from a European research collaboration. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohm, K, Kurland, L. The accuracy of medical dispatch - a systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018;26(1):94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersen, MS, Johnsen, SP, Sørensen, JN, Jepsen, SB, Hansen, JB, Christensen, EF. Implementing a nationwide criteria-based emergency medical dispatch system: a register-based follow-up study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013;21(1):53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McQueen, C, Smyth, M, Fisher, J, Perkins, G. Does the use of dedicated dispatch criteria by Emergency Medical Services optimize appropriate allocation of advanced care resources in cases of high severity trauma? A systematic review. Injury. 2015;46(7):1197–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortaro, A, Pascu, D, Zerman, T, et al. The role of the emergency medical dispatch center (EMDC) and prehospital emergency care safety: results from an incident report (IR) system. Can J Emerg Med. 2015;17(4):411–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehn, M, Davies, G, Smith, P, Lockey, D. Emergency versus standard response: time efficacy of London’s Air Ambulance rapid response vehicle. Emerg Med J. 2017;34(12):806–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greif, R, Lockey, AS, Conaghan, P, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015. Section 10. Education and implementation of resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015;95:288–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voskens, FJ, Van Rein, EAJ, Van Der Sluijs, R, et al. Accuracy of prehospital triage in selecting severely injured trauma patients. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(4):322–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamada, SR, Gauss, T, Duchateau, FX, et al. Evaluation of the performance of French physician-staffed emergency medical service in the triage of major trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(6):1476–1483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilmer, I, Chalk, G, Davies, GE, Weaver, AE, Lockey, DJ. Air ambulance tasking: mechanism of injury, telephone interrogation or ambulance crew assessment? Emerg Med J. 2015;32(10):813–816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viereck, S, Møller, TP, Rothman, JP, Folke, F, Lippert, FK. Recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during emergency calls - a systematic review of observational studies. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017;25(1):1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sporer, KA, Youngblood, GM, Rodriguez, RM. The ability of emergency medical dispatch codes of medical complaints to predict ALS prehospital interventions. Prehospital Emerg Care. 2007;11(2):192–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leopardi, M, Sommacampagna, M. Emergency nursing staff dispatch: sensitivity and specificity in detecting prehospital need for physician interventions during ambulance transport in Rovigo Emergency Ambulance Service, Italy. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(5):523–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ball, SJ, Williams, TA, Smith, K, et al. Association between ambulance dispatch priority and patient condition. EMA - Emerg Med Australas. 2016;28(6):716–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: Image

Gamberini et al. supplementary material

Gamberini et al. supplementary material 1

Download Gamberini et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 48.8 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Gamberini et al. supplementary material

Gamberini et al. supplementary material2

Download Gamberini et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 351.3 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Gamberini et al. supplementary material

Gamberini et al. supplementary material 3
Download Gamberini et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 259.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Gamberini et al. supplementary material

Gamberini et al. supplementary material 4
Download Gamberini et al. supplementary material(File)
File 13.8 KB