Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T07:22:34.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Gulf War: The Experience of a Department of Anesthesiology in the Management of Scud Missile Casualties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Yaw Adu-Gyamfi*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor and Chairman, Department of Anesthesiology, King Fahd Hospital of the University
*
Department of Anesthesiology, King Fahd Hospital of the UniversityPO Box 40045 Al-Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Background:

The pivotal role of anesthesiologists in the implementation of disaster plans is not widely appreciated.

Objective:

To describe the role of anesthesiologists as managers in the operating room (OR) especially during hospital disaster management.

Methods:

On 25 February 1991, King Fahd Hospital of the University in Eastern Saudi Arabia, was alerted, received, triaged, and treated the victims of a Scud missile attack on a United States military barracks which killed 28 and injured more than 100 service personnel.

Results:

There were 47 males and 15 females admitted to the hospital. Their initial triage categories of injuries were: 1) red, 23; 2) yellow, 27; and 3) green, 7. The flow of patients through the main operating rooms occurred in two peaks: 1) treated within nine hours (60%); and 2) during the next 11 hours (40%). A total 101 units of blood and blood products were consumed.

The role of the Chief of Anesthesiology was vital in the dynamics of the situation regarding appropriate deployment of staff and ensuring an orderly throughput of victims in the operating room. He also was required to keep track of resources and supply levels in the operating room, so that he could advise the hospital administration appropriately.

Conclusion:

The successful management of a large multi-casualty incident, which involved use of the operating rooms, depended upon the efficient coordination of clearly defined functions with the Chief of Anesthesiology Service as the team leader.

Type
Special Report
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Porter, J, Tayler, E, Templeton, J et al. : Medical response to major disasters. Injury 1990;21:3. (Editorial)Google Scholar
2. Coupland, RM, Parker, PJ, Gray, CR: Triage of war wounded; The experience of the International Committee of the Red Cross. Injury 1992;23:507510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Tachakra, SS, Mitchell MH: Organizational problems of major disasters. Postgraduate Doctor Middle East 1992;15:4448.Google Scholar
4. Tachakra, SS, Robinson, SM: Surgical problems in major disasters. Postgraduate Doctor Middle East 1992;15:2429.Google Scholar
5. Champion, RH, Sacco, WJ, Copes, WS et al. : Revised trauma score. J Trauma. 1989;29:623629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Solhiem, K, Pillgram-Larsen, J: Trauma severity grading and quality control. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (Norway) 1992;112:765768.Google Scholar
7. Eshaya-Chauvin, B, Coupland, RM: Transfusion requirements for the management of the war injured: The experience of the International Red Cross. Br J Anaesth 1992;68:221223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar