Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T04:02:48.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender Issues and Partner Preferences Among a Sample of Emergency Medical Technicians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Sheryl Gonsoulin  and
C. Eddie Palmer
Sheryl Gonsoulin*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Health Science, University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette, Louisiana
C. Eddie Palmer
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette, Louisiana
*
The University of Southwestern Louisiana, College of Nursing, Department of Emergency Health Science, PO Box 42732, Lafayette, LA 70504-2732USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

From its beginnings, the provision of emergency medical services in the United States has been a male-dominated occupation. The objective of this exploratory study was to determine if and how such issues might influence partner preferences of male and female emergency medical technicians (EMTs).

Methods:

Initially, unstructured interviews were conducted with 10 EMS workers enrolled in a paramedic training program in order to see whether and how such issue might affect partner preferences. From the data obtained during these interviews, a questionairre was developed and distributed to participants in an annual meeting of Louisiana Association of Nationally Registered EMTs. Participation was voluntary and uncompensated.

Results:

A total of 49 EMTs (22 women, 27 men) completed the questionairre. The major gender-related issues could be class fied into three dimensions: 1) physical strength; 2) assumption of authoritative roles; and 3) structural (organizational) preparedness to implement gender-friendly working environments. In general, the gender of a partner now “makes no difference”.

Conclusion:

Overall, the EMS work worlds are reflective of the larger society of which they are a part. Now is the time for EMS systems to examine the gendered nature of their organization and of the issues of gendered expectations prevalent in EMS work. Future research should document the changes now due in the field of emergency medical services.

Keywords

ambulance crewsdiscriminationemergency medical servicesemergency medical techniciansfire servicegender issuesparamedicspartner preferencespolice
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 34 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dernocoeur, K, Eastman, JN: Have we really come a long way? Women in EMS survey—Results. Journal of Emergency Medical Services 1992;17:18–19.Google Scholar
2. Knop, L: Woman paramedic pioneer. Emergency 1977;7:39–43.Google Scholar
3. Howell, E, Wildra, L, Hill, MG: Comprehensive Trauma Nursing. 1988; Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company.Google Scholar
4. Cady, G, Mayfield, T: JEMS 200 city survey. Journal of Emergency Medical Services 1996;21:75–86.Google ScholarPubMed
5. Beekman, P, Fankhauser, A: Like it or not, sex is here to stay. Journal of Emergency Medical Services 1991;16:13–14.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Levin, CM: Head and shoulders above the rest. Emergency 1987;19:35–37.Google Scholar
7. Balkin, J: Why policemen don't like policewomen. Journal of Police Science and Administration 1988;16:29–36.Google Scholar
8. Bell, DJ: Policewomen: myths and reality. Journal of Police Science and Administration 1981;10:112–120.Google Scholar
9. Remmington, P: Women in the police: Integration or separation. Qualitative Sociology 1993;6:118–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Reskin, BF, Ross, CE: Jobs, authority, and earnings among managers—The continuing significance of sex. Work and Occupations 1992;19;342–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Phelan, J, Bromet, EJ, Scwartz, JE, Dew, MA, E., Curtis, EC: The work environments of male and female professionals—Objective and subjective characteristics. Work and Occupations 1993;20;68–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Charles, MT: Women in policing: the physical aspect. Journal of Police Science and Administration 1982;10:194–202.Google Scholar
13. Miller, C, White, D: Partners: The good, the bad and the perfect. Journal of Emergency Medical Services 1995;21;46–52.Google Scholar
14. Rexroat, C: Changes in the employment continuity of succeeding cohorts of young women. Work and Occupations 1992;19;18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Cox, TH, Nkomo, SM: A race and gender group analysis of the early career experience of MBAs. Work and Occupation 1992;18:431–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Hall, E: Smiling, deferring and flirting: Doing gender by giving good service. Work and Occupations 1993;20:452–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar