Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:35:15.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Future of Disaster Medicine is Based on Primary Care Involvement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2019

Penelope Burns
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra Hospital, Bldg 4, Level 2, Garran, Australia Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia
Kirsty Douglas
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra Hospital, Bldg 4, Level 2, Garran, Australia
Wendy Hu
Affiliation:
Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia
Peter Aitken
Affiliation:
Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

When disasters happen, people experience broad environmental, physical, and psychosocial effects that can last for years. Researchers continue to focus on the acute physical injuries and aspects of patient care without considering the person as a whole. People who experience disasters also experience acute injury, exacerbations of chronic disease, mental and physical health effects, effects on social determinants of health, disruption to usual preventative care, and local community ripple effects. Researchers tend to look at these aspects of care separately, yet an individual can experience them all at once. The focus needs to change to address all the healthcare needs of an individual, rather than the likely needs of groups. Mental and physical care should not be separated, nor the determinants of health. The person, not the population, should be at the center of care. Primary care, poorly integrated into disaster management, can provide that focus with a "business as usual" mindset. This requires comprehensive, holistic coordination of care for people and families in the context of their local community.

Aim:

To examine how Family Doctors (FDs) actually contribute to disaster response.

Methods:

Thirty-seven disaster-experienced FDs were interviewed about how they contributed to response and recovery when disasters struck their communities.

Results:

FDs reported being guided by the usual evidence-based care characteristics of primary practice. The majority provided holistic comprehensive medical care and did not feel they needed many extra clinical training or skills. However, they did wish to understand the systems of disaster management, where they fit in, and their link to the broader disaster response.

Discussion:

The contribution of FDs to healthcare systems brings strengths of preventative care, early intervention, and ongoing local surveillance by a central, coordinating, and trusted health professional. There is no reason to not include disaster management in primary care.

Type
Primary Health Care
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2019