Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:03:07.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First Responder Accuracy Using SALT after Brief Initial Training

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2015

Christopher W.C. Lee ,
Shelley L. McLeod  and
Michael B. Peddle
Christopher W.C. Lee*
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
Shelley L. McLeod
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
Michael B. Peddle
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada Southwestern Ontario Regional Base Hospital Program, Central Region, London, Ontario, Canada
*
Correspondence: Christopher Lee, MD, BASc Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry Division of Emergency Medicine Department of Medicine Western University London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5W9 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Mass-casualty incidents (MCIs) present a unique challenge with regards to triage as patient volume often outweighs the number of available Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers. A possible strategy to optimize existing triage systems includes the use of other first responder groups, namely fire and police, to decrease the triage time during MCIs, allowing for more rapid initiation of life-saving treatment and prioritization of patient transport.

Hypothesis

First-year primary care paramedic (PCP), fire, and police trainees can apply with similar accuracy an internationally recognized MCI triage tool, Sort, Assess, Life-saving interventions, Treatment/transport (SALT), immediately following a brief training session, and again three months later.

Methods

All students enrolled in the PCP, fire, and police foundation programs at two community colleges were invited to participate in a 30-minute didactic session on SALT. Immediately following this session, a 17-item, paper-based test was administered to assess the students’ ability to understand and apply SALT. Three months later, the same test was given to assess knowledge retention.

Results

Of the 464 trainees who completed the initial test, 364 (78.4%) completed the three month follow-up test. Initial test scores were higher (P<.05) for PCPs (87.0%) compared to fire (80.2%) and police (68.0%) trainees. The mean test score for all respondents was higher following the initial didactic session compared to the three month follow-up test (75% vs 64.7%; Δ 10.3%; 95% CI, 8.0%-12.6%). Three month test scores for PCPs (75.4%) were similar to fire (71.4%) students (Δ 4.0%; 95% CI, −2.1% to 10.1%). Both PCP and fire trainees significantly outperformed police (57.8%) trainees. Over-triage errors were the most common, followed by under-triage and then critical errors, for both the initial and follow-up tests.

Conclusions

Amongst first responder trainees, PCPs were able to apply the SALT triage tool with the most accuracy, followed by fire, then police. Over-triage was the most frequent error, while critical errors were rare.

LeeCWC, McLeodSL, PeddleMB. First Responder Accuracy Using SALT after Brief Initial Training. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(5):447–451.

Keywords

Emergency Medical Servicesfire and rescue personnelmass-casualty incidentspolicetriage
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 30 , Supplement 5 , October 2015 , pp. 447 - 451
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Pesik, N, Keim, ME, Iserson, KV. Terrorism and the ethics of emergency medical care. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37(6):642-646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Jenkins, JL, McCarthy, ML, Sauer, LM, et al. Mass-casualty triage: time for an evidence-based approach. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(1):3-8.Google Scholar
3. Garner, A, Lee, A, Harrison, K, Schultz, CH. Comparative analysis of multiple-casualty incident triage algorithms. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38(5):541-548.Google Scholar
4. Kahn, CA, Schultz, CH, Miller, KT, Anderson, CL. Does START triage work? An outcomes assessment after a disaster. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54(3):424-430; 430.e1.Google Scholar
5. Cross, KP, Cicero, MX. Head-to-head comparison of disaster triage methods in pediatric, adult, and geriatric patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(6):668-676.e7.Google Scholar
6. Schultz, CH. Comparing disaster triage algorithms: selecting the right metric. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;62(6):642-643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Lerner, EB, Schwartz, RB, Coule, PL, et al. Mass casualty triage: an evaluation of the data and development of a proposed national guideline. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(Suppl 1):S25-S34.Google Scholar
8. Cone, DC, Serra, J, Kurland, L. Comparison of the SALT and Smart triage systems using a virtual reality simulator with paramedic students. Eur J Emerg Med. 2011;18(6):314-321.Google Scholar
9. Schenker, JD, Goldstein, S, Braun, J, et al. Triage accuracy at a multiple-casualty incident disaster drill: the Emergency Medical Service, fire department of New York City experience. J Burn Care Res. 2006;27(5):570-575.Google Scholar
10. Sapp, RF, Brice, JH, Myers, JB, Hinchey, P. Triage performance of first-year medical students using a multiple-casualty scenario, paper exercise. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010;25(3):239-245.Google Scholar
11. Jones, N, White, ML, Tofil, N, et al. Randomized trial comparing two mass-casualty triage systems (JumpSTART versus SALT) in a pediatric simulated mass-casualty event. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014;18(3):417-423.Google Scholar
12. Risavi, BL, Salen, PN, Heller, MB, Arcona, S. A two-hour intervention using START improves prehospital triage of mass-casualty incidents. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2001;5(2):197-199.Google Scholar
13. Cone, DC, Serra, J, Burns, K, MacMillan, DS, Kurland, L, Van Gelder, C. Pilot test of the SALT mass-casualty triage system. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009;13(4):536-540.Google Scholar
14. Lerner, EB, Schwartz, RB, Coule, PL, Pirrallo, RG. Use of SALT triage in a simulated mass-casualty incident. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010;14(1):21-25.Google Scholar
15. Deluhery, MR, Lerner, EB, Pirrallo, RG, Schwartz, RB. Paramedic accuracy using SALT triage after a brief initial training. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011;15(4):526-532.Google Scholar
16. Andreatta, PB, Maslowski, E, Petty, S, et al. Virtual reality triage training provides a viable solution for disaster-preparedness. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(8):870-876.Google Scholar
17. Kilner, T, Hall, FJ. Triage decisions of United Kingdom police firearms officers using a multiple-casualty scenario paper exercise. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2005;20(1):40-46.Google Scholar
18. Risavi, BL, Terrell, MA, Lee, W, Holsten, DL. Prehospital mass-casualty triage training-written versus moulage scenarios: how much do EMS providers retain? Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(3):251-256.Google Scholar
19. Worster, A, Sardo, A, Eva, K, Fernandes, CM, Upadhye, S. Triage tool inter-rater reliability: a comparison of live versus paper case scenarios. J Emerg Nurs. 2007;33(4):319-323.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Lee supplementary material

Appendix 1

Download Lee supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 222.9 KB