Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:33:42.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field Decontamination and Triage in Chemical Emergencies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Constance J. Doyle
Constance J. Doyle
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Section of Emergency Services, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan and the Jackson County Emergency Services, Jackson, Michigan, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Triage and rescue of casualties from accidents involving hazardous materials is a challenge for many emergency medical services (EMS) personnel. With very toxic materials, the untrained and unprepared rescuer may become a victim. In addition, few hospitals in the United States have decontamination units attached to their emergency departments and emergency department personnel may become exposed if the casualty is not decontaminated. Many environmental cleanup teams, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) team, are well trained in materials handling but are not immediately available when a hazardous materials spill with personal injuries occurs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 3 , Issue 1: Contributions from the Third World Congress on Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Rome, Italy, May, 1983 , 1987 , pp. 37 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Quarantelli, EL: Transportation Accidents Involving Hazardous Chemicals Versus Those Involving Dangerous Nuclear Material. Ohio State University, Disaster Research Center, 1982.Google Scholar
2.Quarantelli, EL: Transportation Accidents Involving Hazardous Chemicals Versus Those Involving Dangerous Nuclear Material. Ohio State University, Disaster Research Center, 1982.Google Scholar
3.Hilbert, GD, Berkley, JH, Qum, FM: Mississauqua: Lessons In Large Scale Evacuation. Proceedings of the 1982 Hazardous Materials Spills Conference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
4.US Department of Transportation: Hazardous Materials 1980 Emergency Response Guidebook. Washington D.C., 1980.Google Scholar
5.Association of American Railroads, Bureau of Explosives: Emergency Handling of Hazardous Materials in Surface Transportation. Washington, D.C., 1981.Google Scholar
6.Taylor, FT: Hazardous Materials Emergency Response System. Proceedings of the 1982 Hazardous Materials Spills Conference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
7.Haddad, L, Winchester, J: Clinical Approach To Poisons and Toxicology. Chapter 14, Doyle, CJ, Little, NE, Ulin, LS: Acute Exposure To Hazardous Materials, 1983.Google Scholar
8.US Environmental Protection Agency: Levels of Protection. 1981.Google Scholar
9.Dalstrom, D: Environmental Disasters and Medical Response in Environmental Protection Agency and Ecology and Environment: Personnel Protection Safety Manual. Buffalo, NY, 1981.Google Scholar