Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T09:03:14.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Existing Approaches to Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Education and Training for Health Professionals: Findings from an Integrative Literature Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Mayumi Kako ,
Karen Hammad ,
Satoko Mitani  and
Paul Arbon
Mayumi Kako*
Affiliation:
Flinders University, Torrens Resilience Institute, Adelaide, Australia
Karen Hammad
Affiliation:
Flinders University, Torrens Resilience Institute, Adelaide, Australia
Satoko Mitani
Affiliation:
Gifu University of Medical Science, Seki City Gifu, Japan
Paul Arbon
Affiliation:
Flinders University, Torrens Resilience Institute, Adelaide, Australia
*
Correspondence: Mayumi Kako, PhD, RN Flinders University Torrens Resilience Institute GPO Box 2001 Adelaide, 5001, Australia E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

This review was conducted to explore the literature to determine the availability, content, and evaluation of existing chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) education programs for health professionals.

Methods

An integrative review of the international literature describing disaster education for CBRN (2004-2016) was conducted. The following relevant databases were searched: Proquest, Pubmed, Science Direct, Scopus, Journals @ OVID, Google Scholar, Medline, and Ichuschi ver. 5 (Japanese database for health professionals). The search terms used were: “disaster,” “chemical,” “biological,” “radiological,” “nuclear,” “CBRN,” “health professional education,” and “method.” The following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms, “education,” “nursing,” “continuing,” “disasters,” “disaster planning,” and “bioterrorism,” were used wherever possible and appropriate. The retrieved articles were narratively analyzed according to availability, content, and method. The content was thematically analyzed to provide an overview of the core content of the training.

Results

The literature search identified 619 potentially relevant articles for this study. Duplicates (n=104) were removed and 87 articles were identified for title review. In total, 67 articles were discarded, yielding 20 articles for all-text review, following 11 studies were retained for analysis, including one Japanese study. All articles published in English were from the USA, apart from the two studies located in Japan and Sweden. The most typical content in the selected literature was CBRN theory (n=11), followed by studies based on incident command (n=8), decontamination (n=7), disaster management (n=7), triage (n=7), personal protective equipment (PPE) use (n = 5), and post-training briefing (n=3).

Conclusion

While the CBRN training course requires the participants to gain specific skills and knowledge, proposed training courses should be effectively constructed to include approaches such as scenario-based simulations, depending on the participants’ needs.

KakoM, HammadK, MitaniS, ArbonP. Existing Approaches to Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Education and Training for Health Professionals: Findings from an Integrative Literature Review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(2):182–190.

Keywords

CBRN disastereducationintegrative reviewmethods
Type
Comprehensive Reviews
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 182 - 190
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest/funding: There are no conflicts of interest for this manuscript. This project was supported by Flinders University, the College of Nursing and Health Sciences (Adelaide, Australia), Start-up grant in 2013-14.

References

1. European Commission Directorate-General Home Affairs. Directorate A: Internal Security, Unit A.1: Crisis Management - Terrorism. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/crisis-and-terrorism/securing-dangerous-material/docs/cbrn_glossary_en.pdf. Accessed December 22, 2016.Google Scholar
2. CRED. Disaster Trends. http://www.emdat.be/disaster_trends/index.html. Accessed December 6, 2016.Google Scholar
3. Ackerman, G, Binder, M, Iarocci, E. A Global Picture of Non-State Actors and CBRN. https://warontherocks.com/2014/08/a-global-picture-of-non-state-actors-and-cbrn/. Accessed February 8, 2017.Google Scholar
4. Center for Systematic Peace. Global Conflict Trends: Assessing the Qualities of Systemic Peace. http://www.systemicpeace.org/conflicttrends.html. Accessed February 8, 2017.Google Scholar
5. O’Sullivan, TL, Dow, D, Turner, MC, et al. Disaster and emergency management: Canadian nurses’ perceptions of preparedness on hospital front lines. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(3):s11-s18.Google Scholar
6. Veenema, TG, Walden, B, Feinstein, N, Williams, JP. Factors affecting hospital-based nurses’ willingness to respond to a radiation emergency. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(4):224-229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Considine, J, Mitchell, B. Chemical, biological, and radiological incidents: preparedness and perceptions of emergency nurses. Disasters. 2009;33(3):482-497.Google Scholar
8. Errett, NA, Barnett, DJ, Thompson, CB, et al. Assessment of psychological preparedness and emergency response: willingness of local public health department and hospital workers. Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2012;14(2):125-133.Google Scholar
9. Masterson, L, Steffen, C, Brin, M, Kordick, MF, Christos, S. Willingness to respond: of emergency department personnel and their predicted participation in mass casualty terrorist events. J Emerg Med. 2009;36(1):43-49.Google Scholar
10. Mitchell, CJ, Kernohan, WG, Higginson, R. Are emergency care nurses prepared for chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or explosive incidents? Int Emerg Nurs. 2012;20(3):151-161.Google Scholar
11. Corrigan, E, Samrasinghe, I. Disaster preparedness in an Australian urban trauma center: staff knowledge and perceptions. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012;27(5):432-438.Google Scholar
12. Hammad, KS, Arbon, P, Gebbie, K, Hutton, A. Nursing in the emergency department (ED) during a disaster: a review of the current literature. Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2012;15(4):235-244.Google Scholar
13. Chaput, CJ, Deluhery, MR, Stake, CE, Martens, KA, Cichon, ME. Disaster training for prehospital providers. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007;11(4):458-465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Torraco, RJ. Writing integrative literature reviews: using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review. 2016;15(4):404-428.Google Scholar
15. Whittemore, R, Knafl, K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Advanced Nurs. 2005;52(5):546-553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Braun, V, Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101.Google Scholar
17. Sandström, BE, Eriksson, H, Norlander, L, Thorstensson, M, Cassel, G. Training of public health personnel in handling CBRN emergencies: a table-top exercise card concept. Environ Int. 2014;72:164-169.Google Scholar
18. Heinrichs, WL, Youngblood, P, Harter, PM, Dev, P. Simulation for team training and assessment: case studies of online training with virtual worlds. World J Surg. 2008;32(2):161-170.Google Scholar
19. Collander, B, Green, B, Millo, Y, Shamloo, C, Donnellan, J, DeAtley, C. Development of an “all-hazards” hospital disaster preparedness training course utilizing multi-modality teaching. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(1):63-67; discussion 68-69.Google Scholar
20. Heinrichs, WL, Youngblood, P, Harter, P, Kusumoto, L, Dev, P. Training healthcare personnel for mass-casualty incidents in a virtual emergency department: VED II. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010;25(5):424-432.Google Scholar
21. Klein, KR, Atas, JG, Collins, J. Testing emergency medical personnel response to patients with suspected infectious disease. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2004;19(3):256-265.Google Scholar
22. Kyle, RR, Via, DK, Lowy, RJ, Madsen, JM, Marty, AM, Mongan, PD. A multidisciplinary approach to teach responses to weapons of mass destruction and terrorism using combined simulation modalities. J Clin Anesth. 2004;16(2):152-158.Google Scholar
23. Miller, GT, Scott, JA, Issenberg, SB, et al. Development, implementation, and outcomes of a training program for responders to act of terrorism. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006;10(2):239-246.Google Scholar
24. Scott, JA, Miller, GT, Issenberg, SB, et al. Skill improvement during emergency response to terrorism training. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006;10(4):507-514.Google Scholar
25. Nyamathi, AM, Casillas, A, King, ML, et al. Computerized bioterrorism education and training for nurses on bioterrorism attack agents. J Cont Ed Nurs. 2010;41(8):375-384.Google Scholar
26. Summerhill, EM, Mathew, MC, Stipho, S, et al. A simulation-based biodefense and disaster preparedness curriculum for internal medicine residents. Medical Teacher. 2008;30(6):e145-e151.Google Scholar
27. Mine, H, Asahi, T, Okudera, H, et al. Disaster drill in medical education, School of Medicine, University of Toyama 2008: trial for chemical disaster. Toyama University Medical Society Journal. 2008;19(1):47-50.Google Scholar
28. Sandström, BE, Eriksson, H, Norlander, L, Thorstensson, M, Cassel, G. Training of public health personnel in handling CBRN emergencies: a table-top exercise card concept. Environ Int. 2014;72:164-169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Steadman, RH, Coates, WC, Huang, YM, et al. Simulation-based training is superior to problem-based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(1):151-157.Google Scholar
30. McGaphie, WC, Issenberg, SB, Cohen, ER, Barsuk, JH, Wayne, DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med. 2011;86(6):706-711.Google Scholar
31. Alinier, G, Hunt, B, Gordon, R, Harwood, C. Effectiveness of intermediate-fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53(3):359-369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Hofmann, B. Why simulation can be efficient: on the preconditions of efficient learning in complex technology based practices. BMC Medical Education. 2009;9(1):48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Issenberg, BS, Scalese, RJ. Best evidence on high-fidelity simulation: what clinical teachers need to know. Clinical Teacher. 2007;4(2):73-77.Google Scholar