Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T10:42:03.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence-informed Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) Guidelines: Are They Any Good and Where DoThey Lead Us When Disaster Strikes?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

Michel Dückers
Affiliation:
Nivel - Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands ARQ Centre of Expertise for the Impact of Disasters and Crises, Diemen, Netherlands
Andrea Willems
Affiliation:
ARQ Centre of Expertise for the Impact of Disasters and Crises, Diemen, Netherlands
Charlie Steen
Affiliation:
ARQ Centre of Expertise for the Impact of Disasters and Crises, Diemen, Netherlands
Wera van Hoof
Affiliation:
ARQ Centre of Expertise for the Impact of Disasters and Crises, Diemen, Netherlands
Hans Te Brake
Affiliation:
ARQ Centre of Expertise for the Impact of Disasters and Crises, Diemen, Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Disasters and humanitarian crises can have a tremendous impact on the mental health and psychosocial well-being of affected populations. Reliable and practical evidence-informed mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) guidelines are indispensable for policy and practice to address the mental health impact. Our objective was to review the quality of available guidelines and to explore similarities and differences in content.

Method:

The review was conducted in two steps. Firstly, MHPSS guidelines, frameworks, manuals and toolkits were selected via a systematic literature review as well as a search in the grey literature. A total of 13 MHPSS guidelines were assessed independently by 3–5 raters using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation–Health Systems (AGREE-HS) instrument. Secondly, we analyzed the content of the highest-ranking guidelines.

Results:

Guideline quality scores varied substantially, ranging between 21.3 and 67.6 (range 0–100, M= 45.4), with four guidelines scoring above midpoint (50). Overall, guidelines scored highest (on a 1–7 scale) on topic (M = 5.3) and recommendations (M = 4.2), while implementability (M = 2.7) is arguably the area where most of the progress is to be made. The four guidelines proved largely similar, overlapping or at least complementary in their MHPSS definitions, stated purpose of the guidelines, user and target groups, terminology, and models used. Many recommended MHPSS measures and interventions were found in all of the guidelines and could be categorized. The guidelines stress the importance of monitoring needs and problems, evaluating the effect of service delivery, deliberate implementation and preparation, and investments in proper conditions and effective coordination across professions, agencies, and sectors.

Conclusion:

The MHPSS knowledge base embedded in guidelines is rich and contains invaluable content for disaster risk reduction. Although application contexts differ geographically, available guidelines should allow policymakers and practitioners globally to plan, implement, and evaluate MHPSS actions.

Type
Lightning and Oral Presentations
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine