Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:25:10.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EMS Providers Do Not Accurately Note Motor-Vehicle Crash Patients With Positive Serum Alcohol Concentrations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Ronald F. Maio ,
Audrey Wu ,
Frederic C. Blow  and
Brian Zink
Ronald F. Maio*
Affiliation:
Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Audrey Wu
Affiliation:
Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Frederic C. Blow
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Alcohol Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Brian Zink
Affiliation:
Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
*
Section of Emergency Medicine, TC B1354/0303, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0303 USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Alcohol use is associated with many motor-vehicle crashes and may increase the severity of injury. Because alcohol use also may mask injury, prehospital emergency care providers (PHECPs) may make inaccurate assessments. To assess and triage crash victims accurately, PHECPs must identify recent alcohol use.

Study Objective:

This study examines the accuracy of PHECPs in identifying motor-vehicle crash victims who had positive serum alcohol concentrations.

Design:

Retrospective cohort study.

Population:

Included in the study were motor-vehicle crash victims more than 17 years of age who were conveyed directly to a university medical center emergency department by ground ambulance (n = 372).

Time Period:

15 July 1990 to 15 July 1991.

Methods:

Data sources included ambulance report forms and hospital records. Variables that were abstracted included the Revised Trauma Score (RTS), the PHECPs' impression of alcohol use, and serum alcohol concentrations. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive-value positive, predictive-value negative, and 0.95 confidence intervals (0.95 CI) were calculated for the PHECPs' ability to identify patients with a serum alcohol concentration >0. The relationship between the RTS and the impressions of alcohol use was analyzed with chi-square testing: a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Conclusion:

This study suggests that tims with positive serum alcohol concentrations. Selection bias and retrospective design are significant limitations of this study. Future studies should develop and evaluate methods to improve PHECPs' accuracy in assessing alcohol use in motor-vehicle crash victims.

Keywords

alcoholalcohol screeningemergency medical servicesfield sobriety testinginjurymotor-vehicle crashprehospital emergency care providertriage
Type
Brief Report
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , June 1995 , pp. 110 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Presented at NAEMSP, Scientific Assembly, Portland, Oregon, August 1994

References

1. Peerine, M, Peck, R, Fell, J: Epidemiological perspectives on drunk driving. In: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Surgeon General's Workshop on Drunk Driving: Background Papers. Washington, D.C.: 1989.Google Scholar
2. Roizen, J: Alcohol and trauma. In: Giesbrecht, N, Gonzales, R, Grant, M, et al. (eds). Drinking and Casualties: Accidents, Poisonings and Violence in an International Perspective. London: Routledge, 1988: pp 21–69.Google Scholar
3. Lowenfels, AB: Alcohol and trauma. Ann Emerg Med 1984; 13: 1056–1060.Google Scholar
4. American College of Surgeons. Advanced Trauma Life Support. Chicago, Ill.: American College of Surgeons, 1988: pp 113–125.Google Scholar
5. Ross, S: Early care of the injured patient. In: The Abdomen. 4th ed. Toronto, Philadelphia: B.C. Decker, 1990: pp 159–175.Google Scholar
6. Ducker, TB, Aryanpur, J: Early care of the injured patient. In: Central Nervous System. 4th ed. Toronto, Philadelphia: B.C. Decker, 1990: pp 107–125.Google Scholar
7. Krome, RL: Emergency Medicine: Comprehensive Study Guide, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1985: pp 825–830.Google Scholar
8. Marx, JA: Emergency Medicine: Concepts and Clinical Practice. St. Louis: Mosby, 1992: pp 380–408Google Scholar
9. Waller, PF, Stewart, JR, Hansen, AR, et al. : The potentiating effects of alcohol on driver injury. JAMA 1986;256:1461–1466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Penttila, A, Tenhu, M, Kataja, M: Examination of Alcohol Intoxication in Cases of Suspected Drunken Drivers II. Reports from Liikenneturva, Central Organization for Safety in Finland, 1974:18–21.Google Scholar
11. Penttila, A, Tenhu, M, Kataja, M: Examination of alcohol intoxication in cases of suspected drunken drivers II. Reports from Liikenneturva, Central Organization for Safety in Finland, 1974:12–17.Google Scholar
12. Tharp, V, Burns, M, Moskowitz, H: Development and Field Test of Psychophysical Tests done DWI Arrest, Contract No. DOT-HS—1970, 1981, Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, 1981:19, 27–28.Google Scholar
13. Sobell, MB, Sobell, LC, VanderSpek, R: Relationships among clinical judgment, and breath-analysis measures of intoxication in alcoholics. Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1979;47:204–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Champion, HR, Sacco, WJ, Copes, WS, et al. : A revision of the trauma score. J Trauma 1989;29:623–629.Google Scholar
15. Harpe, KG, Yealy, DM, Heller, MB, et al. : Saliva alcohol reagent strips in altered response protocols. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 1990;5:41–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed