Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:37:01.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emergency Response to Nuclear Accident and Attack

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Jennifer Leaning-Link ,
Mitchell Kling  and
Mary E. Lord
Jennifer Leaning-Link
Affiliation:
From “Physicians for Social Responsibility,” 639 Massachusets Ave., Cambridge MA 02139USA. Telephone (617)491-2754.
Mitchell Kling
Affiliation:
From “Physicians for Social Responsibility,” 639 Massachusets Ave., Cambridge MA 02139USA. Telephone (617)491-2754.
Mary E. Lord
Affiliation:
From “Physicians for Social Responsibility,” 639 Massachusets Ave., Cambridge MA 02139USA. Telephone (617)491-2754.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Disaster plans in response to a nuclear crisis involve extended forays into uncertainty. Controversy arises over whether or not a nuclear disaster or war might ever occur. Estimates of destructive parameters vary widely. Planning must take into account a wide range of issues, from the nature of radiation injury to the survival capacity of social systems. From the standpoint of analyzing possibilities for emergency response, we will discuss: l) medical effects of radiation; 2) severe core meltdown at a nuclear power plant; and 3) a scenario for a nuclear bomb explosion over one city in the USA, in the setting of a strategic nuclear exchange.

Type
Part III: International Organizations - Planning - Disaster Events
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 1 , supplement S1: Disaster Resuscitology , 1985 , pp. 385 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1a Andrews, GA. The medical management of accidental total-body irradiation. In Hubner, KF, Fry, SA (eds.), The Medical Basis for Radiation Accident Preparedness. New York: Elsevier, 1980; pp. 297–310.Google Scholar
1b Franger, H, Lusbaugh, CC. Radiation death from cardiovascular shock following a criticality accident. Arch Path 1967;83:446–460.Google Scholar
1c Karas, JS, Stanbury, JB. Fatal radiation from an accidental nuclear excursion. New Engl J Med 1965;272:755–761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1d Thoma, GE Jr, Wald, N. The diagnosis and management of accidental radiation injury. J Occup Med 1959;1:421–447.Google Scholar
2a International Atomic Energy Agency. Manual on early medical treatment of possible radiation injury. Safety Series No. 47. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 1978.Google Scholar
2b Leonard, RB, Ricks, RC. Emergency department radiation accident protocol. Ann Emerg Med 1980;9:462–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2c National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Management of persons accidentally contaminated with radionuclides. Washington DC: NCRP Report No. 65, 1980.Google Scholar
2d Poda, GA. Decontamination and decorporation: the clinical experience. In Hubner, KF, Fry, SA (eds.), The medical basis for radiation accident preparedness, 1980; pp. 327–332.Google Scholar
3a Carter, LJ. National protection from iodine–131 urged. Science 1979; 206:201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3b Voelz, GL. Current approaches to the management of internally contaminated persons. Hubner, KF, Fry, SA (eds.), 1980; pp. 315–316.Google Scholar
3c Von Hippel, F. Available thyroid protection. Science 1979; 204:1032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 10 CFR Part 50, Annex to Appendix D, December, 1971.Google Scholar
(4a) Guide and checklist for the development and evaluation of state and local government radiological emergency response plans in support of fixed nuclear facilities, NUREG December 1974;75, 111:4–5.Google Scholar
(4b) Regulatory guide 1:101, Emergency planning for nuclear power plants; March 1977, p 5.Google Scholar
(4c) Planning basis for the development of state and local government radiological emergency response plans in support kof light water nuclear power plants, NUREG 0396, EPA 520/1–78–016, December 1978; Appendices II and III.Google Scholar
5a House Committee on Government Operations. Emergency planning around US nuclear power plants: Nuclear Regulatory Commission oversight. Washington DC: House Report No. 96–413, 1979, 4.Google Scholar
5b Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Criterial for the preparation and evaluation of radiological emergency response plans and preparedness in support of nuclear power plants, NUREG 0654, FEMA-REP-1, January, 1980.Google Scholar
6Nuclear Regulatory Commission. NUREG 0654, p.5. Ref.4,5,6.Google Scholar
7Union of Concerned Scientists (U.C.Sc). The risks of nuclear power. Quotation of Reactor Safety Study WASH–1400, Appendix VI, NUREG 75/014, Table VI 2–1, 2–5; and Reactor Safety Study WASH–1400, Main Report, NUREG 75/014. U.C.Sc, Cambndge MA, 1977, p.115.Google Scholar
8Union of Concerned Scientists, p. 116.Google Scholar
9Union of Concerned Scientists, p. 126. Nuclear energy policy study group. Nuclear power: issues and choices, sponsored by the Ford Foundation, administered by the MITRE Corporation. Cambridge MA, 1977,230; cited in.Google Scholar
10a Rasmussen, NC. Methods of hazard analysis and nuclear safety engineering. In Moss, TH, Sills, DL (eds.), The Three Mile Island nuclear accident. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1981, p.29.Google Scholar
10b Beyea, J. The impact on New York City of reactor accidents at Indian Point. Statement to the New York City Council, June 11, 1979, p. 18.Google Scholar
11Reactor Safety Study. WASH–1400, Appendix VI, Table VI 2–1, 3–1.Google Scholar
12Ford, D. Three Mile Island. The New Yorker, April 6, 1981; pp. 73–76.Google Scholar
13Reactor Safety Study. WASH–1400. Appendix VI, Table VI 2–1, 2–5.Google Scholar
14Nadar, R, Abbots, J. The menace of atomic energy. New York, 1977, 114.Google Scholar
Nadar, R, Abbots, J. Union of Concerned Scientists, 4, 117, 120(ref9).Google Scholar
15Cleary, PG, Comey, DD. Nuclear power plant evacuation plans. Citizens for a Better Environment, CBE – 7865, May 1978, 27. See also Reactor Safety Study, WASH–1400. Appendix VI, 11–5, 13–1, 9–3.Google Scholar
16Pollack, R. Testimony of Critical Mass Energy Project. Senate Committee on Energy, Nuclear Proliferation, and Public Resources, May 9, 1979, p. 5. House Committee on Government Operations, 1–2.Google Scholar
17Study Group on Light Water Reactor Safety. Rev Mod Phys, Suppl No. 1, Summer 1975, S109, cited in Von Hippel, p. 1032, ref 3c.Google Scholar
18Carter, , p. 204, ref 3a.Google Scholar
19Aldrich, DC, McGrath, PE, Rasmussen, NC. Examination of off-site radiological emergency measures for nuclear reactor accidents involving core melt. Sandia Laboratories, SAND 78–0454, June 1978. See also, Reactor Safety Study WASH–1400. Appendix VI, Table VI 11–8, 11–24.Google Scholar
20Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG 0654, p. 9, ref 4, 5, 6.Google Scholar
21Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Special Inquiry Groupon Three Mile Island: a report to the Commissioners and to the public. Washington DC: January 1980;1:70–71.Google Scholar
22Beyea, , pp. 14–15, ref 106.Google Scholar
23Reactor Safety Study. WASH–1400. Appendix VI, 11–6.Google Scholar
24Aldridge, RC. The counterforce syndrome. Washington DC: Institute for Policy Studies, 1979;24–25.Google Scholar
25Boston Study Group. The price of defense. New York, 1979; 84–89.Google Scholar
(a) Fallows, J. National defense. New York, 1981; 145.Google Scholar
(b) Kincaid, W. An alaysis of civil defense in nuclear war. US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, December 1978; pp. 14–16.Google Scholar
(c) United Nations General Assembly. Comprehensive study on nuclear weapons, Report of the Secretary General, A/35/392, New York, September 1980; pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
26United Nations General Assembly, ref. 25c.Google Scholar
27Glasstone, S, Dolan, PJ (eds). The effects of nuclear weapons. Wash DC: US Department of Defense, 1977; pp. 26–79, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28a Brown, H. Convocation address, US Naval College, Rhode Island, August 20, 1980.Google Scholar
28b Kistiakowsky, G. Can a limited nuclear war be won? The Defense Monitor. Newsletter of the Center for Defense Information, vol. X, No.2.Google Scholar
29a Ervin, FR, Sidel, VW et al. The medical consequences of nuclear war, parts I and II. N Engl J Med 1962; 266:1126–1145.Google Scholar
29b Glasstone, and Dolan, (eds), 26–79, 551–552, 570–572, 588–590. Ref 27.Google Scholar
29c Lewis, KN. The prompt and delayed effects of nuclear war. Sci Am 1979;241:35–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29d office of Technology Assessment. The effects of nuclear war, OTA, Washington DC, 1979.Google Scholar
29e United Nations General Assembly, 158–177, ref25c.Google Scholar
30a Defense Civil Preparedness Agency, Materials for presentation on nuclear civil protection, Information Bulletin No. 306, Department of Defense, Washington DC, April 1979.Google Scholar
30b Feld, B. The nature of fallout. Symposium on Medical Consequences of Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear War. New York, September 27, 1980; p. 16.Google Scholar
30c Geiger, HJ. A nuclear attack on New York City: acute medical problems among survivors. Symposium on Medical Consequences of Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear War. New York, September 27, 1980; p. 12.Google Scholar
30d Glasstone, and Dolan, (eds), p.456, ref27.Google Scholar
31Geiger, HJ, p. 7. See Ref 30c.Google Scholar
32The Committee for the Compilation of Materials on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. New York: Basic Books, 1981, p. 6.Google Scholar
33The Committee for the Compilation of Materials (Ref 32), pp. 484–488, 518.Google Scholar
34Geiger, HJ, 13–16. See Ref 30c.Google Scholar
35Committee for the Compilation of Materials (Ref 32), pp. 142–149.Google Scholar
35b Glasstone, and Dolan, (eds), 588–590. Ref 27.Google Scholar
35c United Nations General Assembly, 174–175. Ref 25c.Google Scholar
36Sidel, et, al, 1143.Google Scholar
37Sidel, et, al, 1136, 1142.Google Scholar
38a Kendall, HW. Long-term consequences – What survival is possible? Symposium on Medical Consequences of Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear War. New York, September 27, 1980; pp. 11–17.Google Scholar
38b Lewis, , 46–47. Ref 29c.Google Scholar
38c National Academy of Sciences, Long-term worldwide effects of multiple nuclear weapons detonations, Washington DC, 1975.Google Scholar
39Defense Civil Preparedness Agency. Information Bulletin No. 306. Preparing crisis relocation. Planning emergency public information. Working Draft CP6–2–8–F, Washington DC, February 1977.Google Scholar