Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:03:53.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emergency Medical Vehicle Collisions in an Urban System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

William A. Biggers Jr. ,
Brian S. Zachariah  and
Paul E. Pepe
William A. Biggers Jr.*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, USAF Medical Center, Keesler AFB, Mississippi
Brian S. Zachariah
Affiliation:
Emergency Medicine Education, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
Paul E. Pepe
Affiliation:
City of Houston EMS and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
*
251 Bayview Avenue, Biloxi, MS 39530, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Emergency medical services collisions (EMVCs) are a largely unexplored area of emergency medical services (EMS) research. Factors that might contribute to an EMVC are numerous and include use of warning lights and siren (WL&S). Few of these factors have been evaluated scientifically. Similarly, the incidence and severity of EMVCs is poorly documented in the literature. This study sought to define the incidence and severity of, and where possible, identify any contributing factors to EMVCs in a large urban system.

Methods:

Retrospective study of all collisions involving vehicles assigned to the EMS Division of the Houston Fire Department in calendar year 1993. Fifty-one ambulances were operational 24 hours per day during calendar year 1993. Houston EMS received 150,000 requests for assistance, made 180,000 vehicular responses, and accrued 2,651,760 miles in 1993.

Results:

Eighty-six EMVCs were identified during the study period. The gross incidence rate was therefore 3.2 EMVC/100,000 miles driven or 4.8 collisions/10,000 responses. Of the 86 EMVCs, 74 (86%) files were complete and available for evaluation. Major collisions, determined according to injuries or vehicular damage, accounted for 10.8% of all EMVCs. There were 17 persons transported to hospitals from EMS collisions, yielding an injury incidence of 0.64 injuries/100,000 miles driven or 0.94 injuries/10,000 responses. There were no fatalities. The majority of collisions (85.1%) occurred at some site other than an intersection. There was no statistical association between occurrence at an intersection and severity, day versus night, weekend versus weekday, presence or absence of precipitation, or use of WL&S versus severity of collision. Drivers with a history of previous EMVCs were involved in 33% of all collisions. The presence of prior EMVCs was associated (p < 0.001) with the number of persons transported from the collision to a local hospital. Five drivers, all with previous EMVCs, accounted for 88.2% (15/17) of all injuries.

Conclusions:

A few drivers with previous EMVCs account for a disproportionate number of EMVCs and nearly 90% of all injuries. This risk factor—history of previous EMVC—has not been reported in the EMS literature. It is postulated that this factor ultimately will prove to be the major determinant of EMVCs. Data collection of EMS collisions needs to be standardized and a proposed collection tool is provided.

Keywords

ambulancecollisionsdriver historyemergency medical servicesincidenceinjuriessirenwarning lights
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 195 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Auerbach, PS, Morris, JA, Phillips, JB, et al. : An analysis of ambulance accidents in Tennessee. JAMA 1987;258:1487–1490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Saunders, CE, Heye, CJ: Ambulance collisions in an urban environment. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 1994;9:118–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Clawson, J: Ambulance Accidents. Journal of Emergency Medical Services 1988;13:23.Google Scholar
4. Clawson, JJ: “Running hot” and the case of Sharron Rose. Journal of Emergency Medical Services 1991 July:11–13.Google ScholarPubMed
5. National Association of Emergency Medical Services Physicians: Use of warning lights and siren in emergency medical vehicle response and patient transport. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 1994;9:133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Pirrallo, RG, Swor, RA: Characteristics of fatal ambulance crashes during emergency and nonemergency operation. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 1994;9:125–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Elling, R: Dispelling myths on ambulance accidents. Journal of Emergency Medical Services 1989;14:60–64.Google ScholarPubMed
8. Solomon, SS: Ambulance accident avoidance. Emergency 1985;17:34–5, 44.Google Scholar
9. Caldwell, LH: Hard lessons. Fire Command 1990;57:20–21.Google Scholar
10. Beck, D: New study addresses ambulance accidents. Journal of Emergency Medical Services 1987;12:21.Google Scholar
11. Staff report: Exploring the intersection illusion. Mechanical Engineering 1986;February:37–39.Google Scholar
12. DeLorenzo, RA, Eilers, MA: Lights and siren: A review of emergency vehicle warning systems. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:1331–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Tillmann, WA, Hobbs, GE: The accident-prone automobile driver. Am J Psychiatry 1949;106:321–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Guohua, L, Baker, SP: Prior crash and violation records of pilots in commuter and air taxi crashes: A case-control study. Aviat Space Environ Med 1994;65:979–985.Google Scholar