Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:14:10.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emergency Department Response to Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive Events: A Systematic Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2018

Saydia Razak Open the ORCID record for Saydia Razak [Opens in a new window] ,
Sue Hignett  and
Jo Barnes
Saydia Razak*
Affiliation:
Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK
Sue Hignett
Affiliation:
Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK
Jo Barnes
Affiliation:
Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK
*
Correspondence: Saydia Razak, MSc Loughborough Design School, LDS 2.22 Loughborough University Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

A Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and explosive (CBRNe) event is an emergency which can result in injury, illness, or loss of life. The emergency department (ED) as a health system is at the forefront of the CBRNe response with staff acting as first receivers. Emergency departments are under-prepared to respond to CBRNe events - recognizing key factors which underlie the ED CBRNe response is crucial to provide evidence-based knowledge to inform policies and, most importantly, clinical practice.

Problem

Challenges in detection, decontamination, and diagnosis are associated with the ED CBRNe response when faced with self-presenting patients.

Methods

A systematic review was carried out in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). An in-depth search strategy was devised to identify studies which focused on the ED and CBRNe events. The inclusion criteria were stringent in terms of the environment (ED), participants (first receivers), situation (CBRNe response), and actions (detection, decontamination, and diagnosis). Fifteen databases and topic-specific journals were searched. Studies were critically appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Papers were thematically coded and synthesized using NVivo 10 (QSR International Ltd, Melbourne, Australia).

Results

Sixty-seven full-text papers were critically appraised using the MMAT; 70% were included (n = 60) as medium- or high-quality studies. Data were grouped into four themes: preparedness, response, decontamination, and personal protective equipment (PPE) problems.

Discussion

This study has recognized the ED as a system which depends on four key factors - preparedness, response, decontamination, and PPE problems - which highlight challenges, uncertainties, inconsistencies, and obstacles associated with the ED CBRNe response. This review suggests that response planning and preparation should be considered at three levels: organizational (policies and procedures); technological (decontamination, communication, security, clinical care, and treatment); and individual (willingness to respond, PPE, knowledge, and competence). Finally, this study highlighted that there was a void specific to detection and diagnosis of CBRNe exposure on self-presenting patients in the ED.

Conclusion:

The review identified concerns for both knowledge and behaviors which suggests that a systems approach would help understand the ED response to CBRNe events more effectively. The four themes provide an evidence-based summary for the state of science in ED CBRNe response, which can be used to inform future policies and clinical procedures.

RazakS, HignettS, BarnesJ. Emergency Department Response to Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive Events: A Systematic Review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(5):543–549.

Keywords

CBRNedecontaminationdetectiondiagnosisemergency department
Type
Comprehensive Review
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 33 , Issue 5 , October 2018 , pp. 543 - 549
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: none.

References

1. Chilcott, R, Wyke, S. “CBRN incidents.” In: Sellwood C, Wapling, A (eds). Health Emergency Preparedness and Response. Oxfordshire: CABI; 2016:166-180.Google Scholar
2. Cabinet Office. Civil Contingencies Act 2004: a short guide. 2004:2-12. Essex Web site. https://www.essex.gov.uk/Your-Council/Local-Government-Essex/Documents/15mayshortguide.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2018.Google Scholar
3. Whetzel, E, Walker-Cillo, G, Chan, GK, Trivett, J. Emergency nurse perceptions of individual and facility emergency preparedness. J Emerg Nurs. 2013;39(1):46-52.Google Scholar
4. Leiba, A, Halpern, P, Priel, IE, et al. A terrorist suicide bombing at a nightclub in Tel Aviv: analyzing response to a nighttime, weekend, multi-casualty incident. J Emerg Nurs. 2006;32(4):294-298.Google Scholar
5. Mitchell, CJ, Kernohan, WG, Higginson, R. Are emergency care nurses prepared for chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or explosive incidents? Int Emerg Nurs. 2012;20(3):151-161.Google Scholar
6. Koenig, KL. Strip and shower: the duck and cover for the 21st Century. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42(3):391-394.Google Scholar
7. Bland, D. “Training HazMat Training for Emergency Departments.” In: Chemical Hazards and Poisons Report Incident Response: Industrial Fires. London, UK: Health Protection Agency; 2006:45-58.Google Scholar
8. Smith, B, Bouchoucha, S, Watt, E. “Care in a chair” – the impact of an overcrowded emergency department on the time to treatment and length of stay of self-presenting patients with abdominal pain. Int Emerg Nurs. 2016;29:9-14.Google Scholar
9. Levitin, HW, Siegelson, HJ, Dickinson, S, et al. Decontamination of mass casualties-re-evaluating existing dogma. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003;18(3):200-207.Google Scholar
10. Mcfee, R, Leiken, J. Death by Polonium-210: lessons learned from the murder of former soviet spy Alexander Litvinenko. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2009;18-23.Google Scholar
11. Kaji, AH, Langford, V, Lewis, RJ. Assessing hospital disaster preparedness: a comparison of an on-site survey, directly observed drill performance, and video analysis of teamwork. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52(3):195-201.Google Scholar
12. O’Sullivan, TL, Dow, D, Turner, MC, et al. Disaster and emergency management: Canadian nurses’ perceptions of preparedness on hospital front lines. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(3):11-18.Google Scholar
13. Williams, J, Walter, D, Challen, K. Preparedness of emergency departments in Northwest England for managing chemical incidents: a structured interview survey. BMC Emerg Med. 2007;7(20):1-5.Google Scholar
14. Anathallee, M, Curphey, A, Beeching, N, Carley, S, Crawford, I, Mackway-Jones, K. Emergency departments (EDs) in the United Kingdom (UK) are not prepared for emerging biological threats and bioterrorism. J Infect. 2007;54(1):12-17.Google Scholar
15. Kollek, D. Canadian emergency department preparedness for a nuclear, biological or chemical event. CJEM. 2003;5(1):18-26.Google Scholar
16. Kotora, JG. An assessment of Chemical, Biological, Radiologic, Nuclear, and Explosive preparedness among emergency department healthcare providers in an inner-city emergency department. J Emerg Manag. 2015;13(5):431-436.Google Scholar
17. Pluye, P, Gagnon, MP, Griffiths, F, Johnson-Lafleur, J. A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(4):529-546.Google Scholar
18. Niska, RW, Burt, CW. Bioterrorism and mass casualty preparedness in hospitals: United States, 2003. Adv Data. 2005;(364):1-14.Google Scholar
19. Timm, N, Reeves, S. A mass casualty incident involving children and chemical decontamination. Disaster Manag Response. 2007;5(2):49-55.Google Scholar
20. Masterson, L, Steffen, C, Brin, M, Kordick, MF, Christos, S. Willingness to respond: of emergency department personnel and their predicted participation in mass casualty terrorist events. J Emerg Med. 2009;36(1):43-49.Google Scholar
21. Jasper, E, Miller, M, Sweeney, B, Berg, D, Feuer, E, Reganato, D. Preparedness of hospitals to respond to a radiological terrorism event as assessed by a full‐scale exercise. J Public Heal Manag Pract. 2005;11(6):11-16.Google Scholar
22. Wong, K, Turner, PS, Boppana, A, et al. Preparation for the next major incident: are we ready? Emerg Med J. 2006;23:709-712.Google Scholar
23. Kollek, D, Cwinn, A. A hospital emergency readiness overview study. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011;26(3):159-165.Google Scholar
24. Schultz, CH, Koenig, KL, Whiteside, M, Murray, R. Development of national standardized all-hazard disaster core competencies for acute care physicians, nurses, and EMS professionals. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;59(3):196-208.Google Scholar
25. Djalali, A, Della Corte, F, Segond, F, et al. TIER competency-based training course for the first receivers of CBRN casualties. Eur J Emerg Med. 2016;24(5):371-376.Google Scholar
26. Klima, DA, Seiler, SH, Peterson, JB, et al. Full-scale regional exercises. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(3):592-598.Google Scholar
27. Reddy, MC, Paul, SA, Abraham, J, McNeese, M, DeFlitch, C, Yen, J. Challenges to effective crisis management: Using information and communication technologies to coordinate emergency medical services and emergency department teams. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78(4):259-269.Google Scholar
28. Zhu, S, Abraham, J, Paul, SA, et al. R-CAST-MED: Applying intelligent agents to support emergency medical decision-making teams. Artif Intell Med Proc. 2007;4594:24-33.Google Scholar
29. Becker, SM, Middleton, SA. Improving hospital preparedness for radiological terrorism: perspectives from emergency department physicians and nurses. Disaster Med Public Heal Prep. 2008;2:174-184.Google Scholar
30. Considine, J, Mitchell, B. Chemical, biological and radiological incidents: preparedness and perceptions of emergency nurses. Disasters. 2009;33(3):482-497.Google Scholar
31. Oh, JJ, Yong, R, Ponampalam, R, Anantharman, V, Lim, SH. Mass casualty incident involving pepper spray exposure: impact on the emergency department and management of casualties. Hong Kong J Emerg Med. 2010;17(4):352-359.Google Scholar
32. Treat, KN, Williams, JM, Furbee, PM, Manley, WG, Russell, FK, Stamper, CD. Hospital preparedness for weapons of mass destruction incidents: an initial assessment. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38(5):562-565.Google Scholar
33. Kollek, D. Canadian emergency department preparedness for a nuclear, biological or chemical event. CJEM. 2003;5(1):18-26.Google Scholar
34. Masterson, Kordick SC. Willingness to respond: a survey of emergency department personnel and their predicted participation in mass casualty terrorist events. Res Forum Abstr. 2004;363(1869):1870.Google Scholar
35. Cone, DC, Cummings, BA. Hospital disaster staffing: if you call, will they come? Am J Disaster Med. 2006;1(1):28-36.Google Scholar
36. Waage, S, Poole, JC, Thorgersen, EB. Rural hospital mass casualty response to a terrorist shooting spree. Br J Surg. 2013;100(9):1198-1204.Google Scholar
37. Durukan, P, Ozdemir, C, Coskun, R, et al. Experiences with endosulfan mass poisoning in rural areas. Eur J Emerg Med. 2009;16(1):53-56.Google Scholar
38. Raiter, Y, Farfel, A, Lehavi, O, et al. Mass casualty incident management, triage, injury distribution of casualties and rate of arrival of casualties at the hospitals: lessons from a suicide bomber attack in downtown Tel Aviv. Emerg Med J. 2008;25(4):225-229.Google Scholar
39. Satterthwaite, PS, Atkinson, CJ. Using “reverse triage” to create hospital surge capacity: Royal Darwin Hospital’s response to the Ashmore Reef disaster. Emerg Med J. 2012;29:160-162.Google Scholar
40. Shah, AA, Rehman, A, Sayyed, RH, et al. Impact of a predefined hospital mass casualty response plan in a limited resource setting with no pre-hospital care system. Injury. 2015;46(1):156-161.Google Scholar
41. Castle, N. Care after chemical, biological, radiation or nuclear events. Emerg Nurse. 2010;18(7):26.Google Scholar
42. Cohen, DC, Sevdalis, N, Patel, V, Taylor, D, Batrick, N, Darzi, AW. Major incident preparation for acute hospitals: current state-of-the-art, training needs analysis, and the role of novel virtual worlds simulation technologies. J Emerg Med. 2012;43(6):1029-1037.Google Scholar
43. Brinker, A, Gray, SA, Schumacher, J. Influence of air-purifying respirators on the simulated first response emergency treatment of CBRN victims. Resuscitation. 2007;74(2):310-316 Google Scholar
44. Schumacher, J, Bond, AR, Woodham, V, Buckingham, A, Garnham, F, Brinker, A. Survey of UK health care first responders’ knowledge of personal protective equipment requirements. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(3):254-258.Google Scholar
45. George, G, Ramsay, K, Rochester, M, et al. Facilities for chemical decontamination in accident and emergency departments in the United Kingdom. Emerg Med J. 2002;19(5):453-457.Google Scholar
46. Wetter, DC, Daniell, WE, Treser, CD. Hospital preparedness for victims of chemical or biological terrorism. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(5):710-716.Google Scholar
47. Castle, N, Bowen, J, Spencer, N. Does wearing CBRN-PPE adversely affect the ability for clinicians to accurately, safely, and speedily draw up drugs? Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010;48(6):522-527.Google Scholar
48. Flaishon, R, Sotman, A, Ben-Abraham, R, Rudick, V, Varssano, D, Weinbroum, A. Antichemical protective gear prolongs time to successful airway management: a randomized, crossover study in humans. Anesthesiology. 2004;100(2):260-266.Google Scholar
49. Castle, N, Owen, R, Hann, M, Clark, S, Reeves, D, Gurney, I. Impact of chemical, biological, radiation, and nuclear personal protective equipment on the performance of low- and high-dexterity airway and vascular access skills. Resuscitation. 2009;80(11):1290-1295.Google Scholar
50. Whetzel, E, Walker-Cillo, G, Chan, GK, Trivett, J. Emergency nurse perceptions of individual and facility emergency preparedness. J Emerg Nurs. 2013;39(1):46-52.Google Scholar
51. Labrague, LJ, Hammad, K, Gloe, DS, et al. Disaster preparedness among nurses: a systematic review of literature. Int Nurs Rev. 2017:1-13.Google Scholar
52. Wilson, JR. Fundamentals of systems ergonomics. Work. 2012;41 (SUPPL.1):3861-3868.Google Scholar
53. Barnett, DJ, Thompson, CB, Errett, NA, et al. Determinants of emergency response willingness in the local public health workforce by jurisdictional and scenario patterns: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):164.Google Scholar
54. Maxwell, C. Hospital organizational response to the nuclear accident at Three Mile Island: implications for future-oriented disaster planning. Am J Public Health. 1982;72(3):275-279.Google Scholar
55. Ochi, S, Tsubokura, M, Kato, S, et al. Hospital staff shortage after the 2011 triple disaster in Fukushima, Japan-an earthquake, tsunamis, and nuclear power plant accident: a case of the Soso district. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):1-12.Google Scholar
56. Ashkenazi, I, Kessel, B, Khashan, T, et al. Precision of in-hospital triage in mass-casualty incidents after terror attacks. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006;21(1):20-23.Google Scholar
57. Malik, ZU, Hanif, MS, Tariq, M, et al. Mass casualty management after a suicidal terrorist attack on a religious procession in Quetta Pakistan. J Coll Physicians Surg Pakistan. 2006;16(4):253-256.Google Scholar
58. Schumacher, J, Arlidge, J, Garnham, F, Ahmad, I. A randomized crossover simulation study comparing the impact of chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear substance personal protection equipment on the performance of advanced life support interventions. Anaesthesia. 2017;72(5):592-597.Google Scholar
59. Health Protection Agency: CBRN Incidents: Clinical Management & Health Protection. Gov UK Web site. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/340709/Chemical_biological_radiological_and_nuclear_incidents_management.pdf. Accessed May 16, 2018.Google Scholar
60. NHS England Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response (EPRR): Planning for the management of self-presenting patients in healthcare settings. NHS England Web site. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20161104231146/https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/eprr-chemical-incidents.pdf. Accessed May 17, 2018.Google Scholar
61. Core Standards for Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response (EPRR). NHS England Web site. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/nhse-core-standards-150506.pdf. Accessed May 17, 2018.Google Scholar
62. Home Office. Initial Operational Response to a CBRN Incident. 2015; http://www.jesip.org.uk/uploads/media/pdf/CBRN JOPs/IOR_Guidance_V2_July_2015.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed May 17, 2018.Google Scholar
63. National Ambulance Resilience Unit. Initial Operational Response for the wider NHS. NARU Web site. https://naru.org.uk/videos/ior-nhs/. Accessed May 16, 2018.Google Scholar
64. Morelli, I, Sabbadini, MG, Bortolin, M. Orthopedic injuries and their treatment in children during earthquakes: a systematic review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(5):478-485.Google Scholar
65. Lee, ACK, Booth, A, Challen, K, Gardois, P, Goodacre, S. Disaster management in low- and middle-income countries: scoping review of the evidence base. Emerg Med J. 2014;31(1):78-83.Google Scholar
66. Challen, K, Lee, AC, Booth, A, Gardois, P, Woods, HB, Goodacre, SW. Where is the evidence for emergency planning? A scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):542.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Razak et al. supplementary material

Table S2

Download Razak et al. supplementary material(File)
File 32.5 KB