Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T11:14:15.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic Temperature and Humidity Environmental Profiles: Impact for Future Emergency and Disaster Preparedness and Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2014

William J. Ferguson ,
Richard F. Louie ,
Chloe S. Tang ,
Kyaw Tha Paw U  and
Gerald J. Kost
William J. Ferguson*
Affiliation:
Point-of-Care Testing Center for Teaching and Research, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California USA
Richard F. Louie
Affiliation:
Point-of-Care Testing Center for Teaching and Research, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California USA
Chloe S. Tang
Affiliation:
Point-of-Care Testing Center for Teaching and Research, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California USA
Kyaw Tha Paw U
Affiliation:
Atmospheric Science Program, Land Air and Water Resources College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California USA
Gerald J. Kost
Affiliation:
Point-of-Care Testing Center for Teaching and Research, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California USA
*
Correspondence: William J. Ferguson, BS UC Davis POC Technologies Center Pathology and Laboratory Medicine University of California Davis 3455 Tupper Hall Davis, CA 95616 E-mail [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

During disasters and complex emergencies, environmental conditions can adversely affect the performance of point-of-care (POC) testing. Knowledge of these conditions can help device developers and operators understand the significance of temperature and humidity limits necessary for use of POC devices. First responders will benefit from improved performance for on-site decision making.

Objective

To create dynamic temperature and humidity profiles that can be used to assess the environmental robustness of POC devices, reagents, and other resources (eg, drugs), and thereby, to improve preparedness.

Methods

Surface temperature and humidity data from the National Climatic Data Center (Asheville, North Carolina USA) was obtained, median hourly temperature and humidity were calculated, and then mathematically stretched profiles were created to include extreme highs and lows. Profiles were created for: (1) Banda Aceh, Indonesia at the time of the 2004 Tsunami; (2) New Orleans, Louisiana USA just before and after Hurricane Katrina made landfall in 2005; (3) Springfield, Massachusetts USA for an ambulance call during the month of January 2009; (4) Port-au-Prince, Haiti following the 2010 earthquake; (5) Sendai, Japan for the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami with comparison to the colder month of January 2011; (6) New York, New York USA after Hurricane Sandy made landfall in 2012; and (7) a 24-hour rescue from Hawaii USA to the Marshall Islands. Profiles were validated by randomly selecting 10 days and determining if (1) temperature and humidity points fell inside and (2) daily variations were encompassed. Mean kinetic temperatures (MKT) were also assessed for each profile.

Results

Profiles accurately modeled conditions during emergency and disaster events and enclosed 100% of maximum and minimum temperature and humidity points. Daily variations also were represented well with 88.6% (62/70) of temperature readings and 71.1% (54/70) of relative humidity readings falling within diurnal patterns. Days not represented well primarily had continuously high humidity. Mean kinetic temperature was useful for severity ranking.

Conclusions

Simulating temperature and humidity conditions clearly reveals operational challenges encountered during disasters and emergencies. Understanding of environmental stresses and MKT leads to insights regarding operational robustness necessary for safe and accurate use of POC devices and reagents. Rescue personnel should understand these principles before performing POC testing in adverse environments.

FergusonWJ , LouieRF , TangCS , Paw UKT , KostGJ . Dynamic Temperature and Humidity Environmental Profiles: Impact for Future Emergency and Disaster Preparedness and Response. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(1):1-8.

Keywords

mean kinetic temperaturepoint-of-careweather profiles
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 4 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Louie, RF, Sumner, SL, Belcher, S, et al. Thermal stress and point-of-care testing performance: suitability of glucose test strips and blood gas cartridges for disaster response. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3(1):13-17.Google Scholar
2. Louie, RF, Ferguson, WJ, Sumner, SL, et al. Effects of dynamic temperature and humidity stresses on point-of-care glucose testing in disaster care. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012;6(3):232-240.Google Scholar
3. Tang, CS, Ferguson, WJ, Louie, RF, et al. Ensuring quality control of point-of-care technologies: effects of dynamic temperature and humidity stresses on glucose quality control solutions. Point of Care. 2012;11(3):147-151.Google Scholar
4. Ferguson, WJ, Louie, RF, Yu, JN et al. Dynamic temperature and humidity profiles for assessing the suitability of point-of-care testing during emergencies and disasters. American Association for Clinical Chemistry Annual meeting, 2011 [Abstract D-20, page A155]. htpp://www.aacc.org/events/annualmtgdirectory/Documents/AACC_11_Abstract-A149-A160.pdf. Accessed March 7, 2013. [Outstanding Research in Critical Care or Point-of-Care Testing Division].Google Scholar
5. Ferguson, WJ, Louie, RF, Curtis, CM, et al. Effects of environmental stress on point-of-care cardiac biomarker test results during simulated emergency/disaster rescue. 2012 AACC Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, CA, July 15-19, 2012. [Abstract D-36, page A157]. http://www.aacc.org/events/annualmtgdirectory/Documents/AACC_12_Abstracts_D31-D75.pdf.Google Scholar
6. Louie, RF, Ferguson, WJ, Curtis, CM, et al. Effects of environmental conditions on point-of-care cardiac biomarker test performance during a simulated rescue: implications for emergency and disaster response. Am J Dis Med. 2013;8(3):205-212.Google Scholar
7. Smith, MD, Davis-Street, JE, Calkins, DS, et al. Stability of i-Stat EC6+ Cartridges: effect of storage temperature on shelf life. Clin Chem. 2004;50(3):669-673.Google Scholar
8. Bamberg, R, Schulman, K, Mackenzie, M, et al. Effect of adverse storage conditions on performance of glucose meter test strips. Clin Lab Sci. 2005;18(4):203-209.Google Scholar
9. Haller, MJ, Shuster, JJ, Schatz, D, et al. Adverse impact of temperature and humidity on blood glucose monitoring reliability: a pilot study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007;9(1):1-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Vanholder, R, Borniche, D, Claus, S, et al. When the earth trembles in the Americas: the experience of Haiti and Chile 2010. Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;117(3):184-197.Google Scholar
11. Rust, MJ, Carlson, NA, Nichols, JH. A thermo-modulating container for transport and storage of glucose meters in a cold weather environment. Point of Care. 2012;11(3):161-164.Google Scholar
12. Klein, KR, Nagel, NE. Mass medical evacuation: Hurricane Katrina and nursing experiences at the New Orleans Airport. Disaster Manag Response. 2007;5(2):56-61.Google Scholar
13. Kline, DG. Inside and somewhat outside charity. J Neurosurg. 2007;106(1):180-188.Google Scholar
14. Delamatar, PL, Finley, AQ, Babcock, C. Downloading and processing NOAA hourly weather station data. http://blue.for.msu.edu/lab-notes/NOAA_0.1-1/NOAA-ws-data.pdf. Accessed March 08, 2013.Google Scholar
15. America Airlines, http://www.united.com/web/en-US/default.aspx. Accessed March 7, 2013.Google Scholar
16. Thibeault, C. Cabin air quality. Aerospace Medical Association. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1997;68(1):80-82.Google Scholar
17. Taylor, J. Recommendations on the control and monitoring of storage and transportation temperatures of medicinal products. Pharma J. 2001;267(28):128-131.Google Scholar
18. Bott, RF, Oliveira, WP. Storage conditions for stability testing of pharmaceuticals in hot and humid regions. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2007;33(4):393-401.Google Scholar
19. United Nations. United States of America –Disaster statistics. Natural disasters from 1980 – 2010. http://www.preventionweb.net/english/countries/statistics/?cid=185. Accessed March 7, 2013.Google Scholar
20. King, JM, Eigenmann, CA, Colagiuri, S. Effect of ambient temperature and humidity on performance of blood glucose meters. Diabet Med. 1995;12(4):337-340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Nawawi, H, Sazali, BS, Kamuruzaman, BH, et al. Effect of ambient temperature on analytical and clinical performance of a blood glucose monitoring system: Omnitest Sensor glucose meter. Ann Clin Biochem. 2001;38(6):676-683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. After Japan's quake and tsunami freezing weather threatens relief efforts. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/16/japan-quake-tsunami-freezing-temperatures-relief. Accessed March 7, 2013.Google Scholar
23. Herr, DM, Newton, NC, Santhrach, PJ, et al. Airborne and rescue point-of-care testing. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995;104(4) suppl.1: S56-S58.Google Scholar
24. Burritt, MF, Santrach, PJ, Hankins, DG, et al. Evaluation of the i-STAT portable clinical analyzer for us in a helicopter. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 1996, suppl. 56(224):121-128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Serio, FD, Petronelli, MA, Sammartino, E. Laboratory testing during critical care transport: point-of-care testing in air ambulances. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48(7):955-961.Google Scholar
26. Gamache CA, Rust MJ, GJ Kost. Thermo-Modulating container for protecting point-of-care devices from extreme temperatures during disaster relief. 39th Northeast Bioengineering Conference, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York USA, April 5-7, 2013.Google Scholar
27. Ferguson, WJ, Vy, J, Louie, RF, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a point-of-care blood gas-electrolyte analyzer potentially robust in cold during emergencies and disasters: evidence from evaluation of reagents in stress testing chambers. 2012. Point of Care. 2012;11(3):152-156.Google Scholar
28. Valenzuela, TD, Criss, EA, Hammargren, WM, et al. Thermal stability of prehospital medications. Ann Emerg Med. 1989;18(2):172-176.Google Scholar
29. Cairns, CB, Cain, BS, Honigman, B, et al. Prehospital storage degrades the physiological effects of epinephrine in human myocardium. Ann J Emerg Med. 1999;34(4):S15.Google Scholar
30. Gammon, DJL, Su, S, Jordan, J, et al. Alteration in prehospital drug concentration after thermal exposure. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26(5):566-573.Google Scholar
31. Grant, TA, Carrol, RG, Church, WH, et al. Environmental temperature variations cause degradations in epinephrine concentration and biological activity. Am J Emerg Med. 1994;12(3):319-322.Google Scholar