Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:50:06.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determinants of On-Scene Time in Injured Patients Treated by Physicians at the Site

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

John S. Sampalis ,
André Lavoie ,
Maribel Salas ,
Andreas Nikolis  and
Jack I. Williams
John S. Sampalis*
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
André Lavoie
Affiliation:
Urgences-Santé, Montreal, Québec, Canada
Maribel Salas
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
Andreas Nikolis
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
Jack I. Williams
Affiliation:
Sunnybrook Medical Centre University of Toronto, North York, Ontario, Canada
*
Montreal General Hospital, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Surgery, 1650 Cedar Ave., Montreal, Québec, Canada H3G 1A4
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

The controversy surrounding the use of advanced life support (ALS) for the prehospital management of trauma pivots on the fact that these procedures could cause significant and life-threatening delays to definitive in-hospital care.

In Montreal, Québec, on-site ALS to injured patients is provided by physicians only. The purpose of this study was to identify parameters associated with the duration of scene time for patients with moderate to severe injuries treated by physicians at the scene.

Hypothesis:

The use of on-site ALS by physicians is associated with a significant increase in scene time.

Methods:

A total of 576 patients with moderate to severe injuries are included in the analysis. This group was part of a larger cohort used in the prospective evaluation of trauma care in Montreal. Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, multiple linear regression, and multiple logistic regression techniques were use to analyze the data.

Results:

Use of ALS in general was associated with a statistically significant increase in the mean scene time of 6.5 min. (p = .0001). Significant increases in mean scene time were observed for initiation of an intravenous route (mean = 6.6 min., p = .0001), medication administration (mean =5.7 min., p = .0001), and pneumatic antishock garment (PASG) application (mean = 9.3 min., p = .03). Similar differences were observed for total prehospital time. A significant increase in the relative odds for having long scene times (>20 min.) also was associated with the use of ALS. This level of scene time was associated with a significant increase in the odds of dying (OR = 2.6, p = .009).

Conclusion:

This study shows that physician-provided, on-site ALS causes significant increase in scene time and total prehospital time. These delays are associated with an increase in the risk for death in patients with an severe injuries.

Keywords

advanced life supportintravenous lineson-scene timephysicians on-sitepneumatic antishock garmenttrauma
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 178 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Trunkey, DD: Trauma, Sci Am 1983; 249: 28–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Gold, CR: Prehospital advanced life support vs. “scoop and run” in trauma management. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16: 797–801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Trunkey, DD: Is ALS necessary for prehospital trauma care? J Trauma 1984; 24: 86–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Smith, JP, Boda, BI, Hill, AS, Frey, CF: Prehospital stabilization of critically injured patients: A failed concept. J Trauma 1985; 25: 65–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Aprahamian, C, Thompson, BM, Towne, JB, Darin, JC: The effect of a paramedic system on mortality of major open intra-abdominal vascular trauma. J Trauma 1983; 23: 687–690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Jacobs, LM, Sinclair, A, Beiser, A, D'Agostino, RB: Prehospital advanced life support: Benefits in trauma. J Trauma 1984; 24: 8–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Potter, D, Goldstein, G, Fung, SC, Selig, M: A controlled trial of prehospital advanced life support: Benefits in trauma. Ann Emerg Med 1988; 17: 582–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Reines, HD, Bartlett, RL, Chudy, NE et al. : Is advanced life support appropriate for victims of motor vehicle accidents?: The South Carolina Highway Trauma Project. J Trauma 1988; 28: 563–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Spaite, DW, Tse, DJ, Valenzuela, TD et al. : The impact of injury severity and prehospital procedures on scene time in victims of major trauma. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20: 1299–1305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Spaite, DW, Valenzuela, TD, Meislin, HW et al. : Prospective validation of a new model for evaluating emergency medical services systems by in-field observation of specific time intervals in prehospital care. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22: 638–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Sampalis, JS, Lavoie, A, Williams, JI et al. : Impact of on-site care, prehospital time, and level of in-hospital care on survival in severely injured patients. J Trauma 1993; 34: 252–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Sampalis, JS, Lavoie, A, Williams, JI et al. : Standardized mortality ratio analysis on a sample of severely injured patients from a large Canadian city without regionalized trauma care. J Trauma 1992; 33: 205–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Koehler Baer, LJ, Malafa, SA et al. : Prehospital Index: A scoring system for field triage of trauma victims. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 15: 178–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Koehler, J, Malfa, SA, Hillesland, J et al. : A multicenter validation of the Prehospital Index. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16: 380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Pons, PT, Honigman, B, Moore, EE, et al; Prehospital advanced trauma life support for critical penetrating wounds to the thorax and abdomen. J Trauma 1985; 25: 828–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Jones, SE, Nesper, TP, Alcouloumre, E: Prehospital intravenous line placement: A prospective study. Ann Emerg Med 1989; 18: 244–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Gervin, AS, Fisher, RP: The importance of prompt transport in salvage of patients with penetrating heart wounds. J Trauma 1982; 22: 443–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Jurkovich, GJ, Campbell, D, Padrta, J, Luterman, A: Paramedic perception of elapsed field time. J Trauma 1987; 27: 892–897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Ramenofsky, ML, Luterman, A, Curreri, PW, Talley, MA: EMS for pediatrics: Optimum treatment or unnecessary delay? J Pediatr Surg 1983; 18: 498–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Lutterman, A, Ramenofsky, M, Berryman, C et al. : Evaluation of prehospital emergency medical services (EMS): Defining areas for improvement, J Trauma 1983; 23: 702–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Ivatury, RR, Nallathambi, MN, Roberge, RJ et al. : Penetrating thoracic injuries: In-field stabilization vs. prompt transport. J Trauma 1987; 27: 1066–1073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Bickell, WH, Shaftan, GW, Mattox, KL: Intravenous fluid administration and uncontrolled hemorrhage. J Trauma 1989; 29: 409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Bickell, WH, Pepe, PE, Wyatt, CH et al. : Effect of antishock trousers on the trauma score: A prospective analysis in the urban setting. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 14: 218–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Bickell, WH, Pepe, PE, Bailey, ML et al. : Randomized trial of pneumatic antishock garments in the prehospital management of penetrating abdominal injuries. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16: 653–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Mattox, KL, Bickell, WH, Pepe, PE, Mangelsdorff, AD: Prospective randomized evaluation of antishock MAST in post-traumatic hypotension. J Trauma 1986; 26: 779–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Clevenger, FW, Yarbrough, DR, Reines, HD: Resuscitative thoracotomy: The effect of field time on outcome. J Trauma 1988; 28: 441–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Losek, JD, Bonadio, WA, Walsh-Kelly, C et al. : Prehospital pediatric endotracheal intubation performance review. Pediatr Emerg Care 1989; 5: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Fox, JB, Thomas, F, Clemmer, TP, Jensen, RL: Paramedic use of advanced life support procedures: Experience and attitude survey. J Emerg Med 1986; 5: 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Stewart, RD, Paris, PM, Winter, PM: Field endotracheal intubation by paramedical personnel. Chest 1984; 85: 341–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Guss, DA, Posluszny, M: Paramedic orotracheal intubation: A feasibility study. Am J Emerg Med 1984; 399–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Guisto, JA, Iserson, KV: The feasibility of 12-gauge intravenous catheter use in the prehospital setting. J Emerg Med 1989; 8: 173–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Maningas, PA, Mattox, KL, Pepe, PE: Hypertonic saline-dextran solutions for the prehospital management of traumatic hypotension, Am J Surg 1989; 157: 528–533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. O'Gorman, M, Trabulsy, P, Pilcher, DB: Zero-time prehospital IV. J Trauma 1989; 29: 84–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Slovis, CM, Hen, EW, Londorf, D et al. : Success rates for initiation of intravenous therapy en route by prehospital care providers. Am J Emerg Med 1990; 8: 305–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35. Honigman, B, Rohweder, K, Moore, EE et al. : Prehospital advanced trauma life support for penetrating cardiac wounds. Ann Emerg Med 1990; 19: 145–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Cwinn, AA, Pons, PT, Moore, EE et al. : Prehospital advanced trauma life support for critical blunt trauma victims. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16: 399–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Hedges, JR, Feero, S, Moore, B et al. : Factors contributing to paramedic on-scene time during evaluation and management of blunt trauma. Am J Emerg Med 1987; 6: 443–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar