Current Disaster Triage Methods in Mass Casualty Incidents

Abstract

Introduction:

Triage in a disaster scenario centers around doing the greatest good for the greatest number of people. There are a variety of triage systems, and to this date there is no US national endorsement of one system because triage is a dynamic procedure and there is no fixed rule for it. The Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START); Sort, Assess, Life-saving interventions, Treatment/Transport (SALT); Sacco; CareFlight; JumpSTART; and Pediatric Triage Tape (PTT) triage systems are discussed with emphasis on how they perform.

Method:

There are approximately 20 adult and two pediatric triage systems that exist for primary disaster triage. The focus is on six primary triage systems. A literature search was performed using textbooks and original research.

Results:

A basic assignment to immediate, delayed, minimal, or expectant can sort a large group of casualties in a matter of minutes, but improper category assignment can lead to under-triage or over-triage.

When assessed by a trained paramedic arriving at a Level 1 pediatric trauma center, SALT was found to be the most accurate triage system at 59% compared to JumpSTART, CareFlight, and TriageSieve. All triage systems exhibited under-triage rates of at least 33% and SALT had the highest over-triage rate at 6%. In another study, the START triage system was found to be 85% sensitive and 86% specific in predicting critical injury in designated trauma patients.

Conclusion:

Mass casualty incidents are unfortunately becoming more common as the increasing numbers of violent attacks produce an overwhelming number of victims. One triage process may not work in all disasters, but first responders should be trained to evaluate for the most critical patients in a sea of evolving patient presentations. Furthermore, randomized, controlled trials in real-world conditions are nearly impossible to perform given the specific circumstances of disasters.