Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T09:42:40.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Counting Crises: US Hospital Evacuations, 1971–1999

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Ernest Sternberg ,
George C. Lee  and
Danial Huard
Ernest Sternberg*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
George C. Lee
Affiliation:
Samuel P. Capen Professor of Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
Danial Huard
Affiliation:
Professional Engineer, graduate student in School of Architecture and Planning, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
*
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Hayes Hall, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14214 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

To investigate the relative distribution of hazards causing hospital evacuations, thereby to provide rudimentary risk information for hospital disaster planning.

Methods:

Cases of hospital evacuations were retrieved from newspaper and publication databases and classified according to hazard type, proximate and original cause, duration, and casualties. Both partial and full evacuations were included. The total number of evacuation incidents for all hazards were compared to the total number of hospital incidents for the one hazard, fire, for which national data is available.

Results:

There were 275 reported evacuation incidents from 1971–1999, with an annual average of 21 in the 1990s, the period for which databases were more reliable. The most, 33, were recorded in 1994, the year of the Northridge Earthquake. Of all incidents, 63 (23%) were attributable primarily to internal fire, followed by internal hazardous materials (HazMat) events (18%), hurricane (14%), human threat (13%), earthquake (9%), external fire (6%), flood (6%), utility failure (5%), and external HazMat (4%).

Conclusions:

More than 50% of the hospital evacuations occurred because of hazards originating in the hospital facility itself or from human intruders. While natural disasters were not the preponderant causes of evacuations, they caused severe problems when multiple hospitals in the same urban area were incapacitated simultaneously. Clearly, as hospitals are vulnerable to many hazards, mitigation investments should be assessed not in terms of single-hazard risk-cost-benefit analysis, but in terms of capacity to mitigate multiple hazards. In view of the many qualifications and limitations of the dataset used here, but value of such data for disaster planning, hospitals should be asked to submit standardized incident reports to permit national data gathering on major disruptions.

Keywords

benefitscostevacuationseventshazardshospitalsplanningrisk
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 150 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Sternberg, E: Planning for resilience in hospital internal disaster. Prehosp Disast Med 2003;18(4):291–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Milsten, A: Hospital responses to acute-onset disasters: A review. Prehosp Disast Med 2000;15(1):32–53.Google Scholar
3Lewis, C, Phuli, R, Aghababian, V: Disaster planning, part I:Overview of hospital and emergency department planning for internal and external disaster. Emerg Med Clinics N Am 1996;14(2):439–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Pan American Health Organization. Mitigation of Disasters in Health Facilities [4 volumes]. Washington, DC: Emergency Preparedness Program, Pan American Health Organization. 1993.Google Scholar
5Hanna, JA: Disaster Planning for Healthcare Facilities. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Hospital Association. 1998.Google Scholar
6Noji, EK: Disaster Medical Services. In: Tintinalli, J, Kelen, GD, Stpczynski, JS: Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000, pp 22–31.Google Scholar
7Special issue: Emergency management in the new millennium. Joint Commission Pespectives 2001;21(12).Google Scholar
8Birnbaum, ML: Indifference, apathy, and preparedness. Prehosp Disast Med 2000;15(1):5–6.Google ScholarPubMed
9Auf der Hiede, E: Disaster Response: Principles of Preparation and Coordination. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby, 1989.Google Scholar
10Kai, T, Ukai, T, Ohta, M, et al. : Hospital disaster preparedness in Osaka, Japan. Prehosp Disast Med 1994;9(1):29–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Barbera, JA, Macintyre, AG, DeAtley, CA: Ambulances to nowhere: America's critical shortfall in medical preparedness for catastrophic terrorism. J Homeland Security 2002. Available at www.homelandsecurity.org/journal/articles. Accessed 01 July 2003.Google Scholar
12United States Fire Administration. Medical facility fires. Topical Fire Research Series. 2001 October (Updated March 2002);2(8).Google Scholar
13Ahrens, M: Selections from the United States fire problem overview report: Leading causes and other patterns and trends, facilities that care for the sick. National Fire Protection Association, June 2001.Google Scholar
14American Hospital Association, Hospital Statistics, 2000 ed. Chicago, IL: American Hospital Association, 2000. Table 1, pp 2–3.Google Scholar