Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:59:27.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cost-Effectiveness and Benefit of Alternatives to Improve Training for Prehospital Trauma Care in Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Abstract

Introduction:

In Latin America, there is a preponderance of prehospital trauma deaths. However, scarce resources mandate that any improvements in prehospital medical care must be cost-effective. This study sought to evaluate the costeffectiveness of several approaches to improving training for personnel in three ambulance services in Mexico.

Methods:

In Monterrey, training was augmented with PreHospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS) at a cost of [US]$150 per medic trained. In San Pedro, training was augmented with Basic Trauma Life Support (BTLS), Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS), and a locally designed airway management course, at a cost of $400 per medic. Process and outcome of trauma care were assessed before and after the training of these medics and at a control site.

Results:

The training was effective for both intervention services, with increases in basic airway maneuvers for patients in respiratory distress in Monterrey (16% before versus 39% after) and San Pedro (14% versus 64%). The role of endotrachal intubation for patients with respiratory distress increased only in San Pedro (5% versus 46%), in which the most intensive Advanced Life Support (ALS) training had been provided. However, mortality decreased only in Monterrey, where it had been the highest (8.2% before versus 4.7% after) and where the simplest and lowest cost interventions were implemented. There was no change in process or outcome in the control site.

Conclusions:

This study highlights the importance of assuring uniform, basic training for all prehospital providers. This is a more cost-effective approach than is higher-cost ALS training for improving prehospital trauma care in environments such as Latin America.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Krug, EG, Sharma, GK, Lozano, R: The global burden of injuries. Am J Pub Health 2000;90:523526.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Smith, GS, Barss, P: Unintentional injuries in developing countries: The epidemiology of a neglected problem. Epidemiol Rev 1991;13:228266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Zwi, A: The public health burden of injury in developing countries. Tropical Diseases Bulletin 1993;90:R5–R45.Google Scholar
4.Arreola-Risa, C., Mock, CN, Padilla, D, et al. : Trauma care systems in urban Latin America: The priorities should be prehospital and emergency room management. J Trauma 1995;39:457462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Mock, CN, Jurkovich, GJ, nii-Amon-Kotei, D, et al. : Trauma mortality patterns in three nations at different economic levels: Implications for global trauma system development. J Trauma 1998;44:804814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.World Bank: Available at www.worldbank.org. Accessed 27 October 2003.Google Scholar
7.World Health Organization: Available at www3.who.int/whosis. Accessed 27 October 2003.Google Scholar
8.McSwain, N (Ed): Prehospital Trauma Life Support. (3rd edition). St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc., 1994.Google Scholar
9.Campbell, JE: Basic Trauma Life Support for Paramedics and Advanced Emergency Medical Services Providers.Prentice-Hall, 1997.Google Scholar
10.Campbell, JE: Basic Trauma Life Support for the EMT-B and First Responders. Prentice-Hall, 1997.Google Scholar
11.Arreola-Risa, C., Mock, CN, Lojero, L, et al. : Low cost improvements in prehospital trauma care in a Latin American city. J Trauma 2000;48:119124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Koehler, JJ, Baer, LJ, Malafa, SA, et al. :Prehospital Index: A scoring system for field triage of trauma victims. Ann Emerg Med 1986;15:178182.Google Scholar
13.Altman, DG: Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1991.Google Scholar
14.Ali, J, Adam, U, Gana, TJ, Williams, JI: Trauma patient outcome after the prehospital trauma life support program. J Trauma 1997;42:10181022.Google Scholar
15.Ali, J, Adam, RU, Gana, TJ, et al. : Effect of the prehospital trauma life support program (Prehospital Trauma Life Support) on prehospital trauma care. J Trauma 1997;42:786790.Google Scholar
16.Marson, A, Thomson, J: The influence of prehospital trauma care on traffic accident mortality. J Trauma 2001;50:917921.Google Scholar
17.Bickell, WH, Wall, MJ, Pepe, PE, et al. : Immediate vs. delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries. N Engl J Med 1994;331:11051109.Google Scholar
18.Bunn, F, Kwan, I, Roberts, I, Wentz, R: Effectiveness of Prehospital Care: A Report by the Cochrane Injuries Group for the World Health Organization. London: The Cochrane Injuries Group, 2001.Google Scholar
19.Bochicchio, GV, Ilahi, O, Joshi, M, et al. : Endotracheal intubation in the field does not improve outcome in trauma patients who present without an acutely lethal traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2003;54:307311.Google Scholar
20.Liberman, M, Mulder, D, Sampalis, J: Advanced or basic life support for trauma: Meta-analysis and critical review of the literature. J Trauma 2000;49:584599.Google Scholar
21.Eckstein, M, Chan, L, Schneir, A, Palmer, R: Effect of prehospital advanced life support on outcomes of major trauma patients. J Trauma 2000;48:643648.Google Scholar