Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:41:13.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Emergency Resuscitation with Colloids and Crystalloids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

William C. Shoemaker
William C. Shoemaker
Affiliation:
From the Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Harbor Hospital, Torrance CA, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Clinical management is exceedingly difficult to evaluate in emergency patients because resuscitation is often chaotic, disorderly, and frantic. Resuscitation depends upon many factors: the primary illness or injury, the amount of blood and fluid losses, the patient's age, the prior state of health, the associated medical conditions, the time delay in instituting therapy, the volume and rate of fluids administered, and, finally, the choice of fluids given. Although it is difficult to control the effects of these complex interrelated factors, their influence may be evaluated by stratifying patients and then comparing the direct effects and outcome measures within each stratum.

There has been persistent controversy over the relative merits of crystalloids and colloids in fluid resuscitation. We studied reviews of fluid management of all hypotensive patients seen in the adult surgical section of the Emergency Department (ED) during a 2½ year period, to compare the conventional crystalloid resuscitation which had been standard for this busy university-run county hospital with a fluid management protocol consisting of about 1/4 A colloids depending on age, cardiac history, and CVP.

Type
Part I: Research-Education-Organization
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 1 , supplement S1: Disaster Resuscitology , 1985 , pp. 10 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Shoemaker, WC, Schluchter, M, Hopkins, JA et al. , Comparison of the relative effectiveness of colloids and crystalloids in emergency resuscitation. Am J Surg; July, 1981:142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Shoemaker, WC, Hopkins, JA, Greenfield, S et al. ,Resuscitation algorithm for management of acute emergencies. JACEP 1978;7:361–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Hopkins, JA, Shoemaker, WC, Greenfield, S et al. , Treatment of surgical emergencies with and without an algorithm. Arch Surg. 1978,115:745–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Shoemaker, WC, Monson, DO. Effect of whole blood and plasma expanders on volume flow relationships in critically ill patients. Surg Gynec Obstet 1973;137:453.Google ScholarPubMed
5. Hauser, CJ, Shoemaker, WC, Turpin, I et al. , Oxygen transport responses to colloids and crystalloids in critically ill surgical patients. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1980;150:811.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Shoemaker, WC, Matsuda, T, State, D. Relative hemodynamic effectiveness of whole blood and plasma expanders in burn patients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1977;144:909.Google Scholar
7. Shoemaker, WC. Comparison of the relative effectiveness of whole blood transfusions and various types of fluid therapy in resuscitation. Crit Care Med 1976;4:71–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Shoemaker, WC, Czer, LSC. Evaluation of the biologic importance of various hemodynamic and oxygen transport variables: Which variables should be monitored in postoperative shock ? Crit Care Med 1979;7:424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed