Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T23:33:08.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cervical Spine Injury is Rare in Self-Inflicted Craniofacial Gunshot Wounds: An Institutional Review and Comparison to the US National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2020

Allison G. McNickle*
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, UNLV School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NevadaUSA
Paul J. Chestovich
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, UNLV School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NevadaUSA
Douglas R. Fraser
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, UNLV School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NevadaUSA
*
Correspondence: Allison G. McNickle, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, UNLV School of Medicine, 1701 W. Charleston Blvd, Suite 490, Las Vegas, Nevada89102USA, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background:

Cadaveric and older radiographic studies suggest that concurrent cervical spine fractures are rare in gunshot wounds (GSWs) to the head. Despite this knowledge, patients with craniofacial GSWs often arrive with spinal motion restriction (SMR) in place. This study quantifies the incidence of cervical spine injuries in GSWs to the head, identified using computerized tomography (CT). Fracture frequency is hypothesized to be lower in self-inflicted (SI) injuries.

Methods:

Isolated craniofacial GSWs were queried from this Level I trauma center registry from 2013-2017 and the US National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2012–2016 (head or face abbreviated injury scale [AIS] >2). Datasets included age, gender, SI versus not, cervical spine injury, spinal surgery, and mortality. For this hospital’s data, prehospital factors, SMR, and CTs performed were assessed. Statistical evaluation was done with Stata software, with P <.05 significant.

Results:

Two-hundred forty-one patients from this hospital (mean age 39; 85% male; 66% SI) and 5,849 from the NTDB (mean age 38; 84% male; 53% SI) were included. For both cohorts, SI patients were older (P < .01) and had increased mortality (P < .01). Overall, cervical spine fractures occurred in 3.7%, with 5.4% requiring spinal surgery (0.2% of all patients). The frequency of fracture was five-fold greater in non-SI (P < .05). Locally, SMR was present in 121 (50.2%) prior to arrival with six collars (2.5%) placed in the trauma bay. Frequency of SMR was similar regardless of SI status (49.0% versus 51.0%; P = not significant) but less frequent in hypotensive patients and those receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The presence of SMR was associated with an increased use of CT of the cervical spine (80.0% versus 33.0%; P < .01).

Conclusion:

Cervical spine fractures were identified in less than four percent of isolated GSWs to the head and face, more frequently in non-SI cases. Prehospital SMR should be avoided in cases consistent with SI injury, and for all others, SMR should be discontinued once CT imaging is completed with negative results.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Joseph, B, Aziz, H, Pandit, V, et al. Improving survival rates after civilian gunshot wounds to the brain. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(1):5865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavaliere, R, Cavenago, L, Siccardi, D, et al. Gunshot wounds of the brain in civilians. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1988;94(3-4):133136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selden, BS, Goodman, JM, Cordell, W, et al. Outcome of self-inflicted gunshot wounds of the brain. Ann Emerg Med. 1988;17(3):247253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaups, KL, Davis, JW. Patients with gunshot wounds to the head do not require cervical spine immobilization and evaluation. J Trauma. 1998;44(5):865867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, A, Liu, TH, Victorino, GP. Cost-utility analysis of prehospital spine immobilization recommendations for penetrating trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(2):534541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haut, ER, Kalish, BT, Efron, DT, et al. Spine immobilization in penetrating trauma: more harm than good? J Trauma. 2010;68(1):115121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DuBose, J, Teixeira, PGR, Hadjizacharia, P, et al. The role of routine spinal imaging and immobilization in asymptomatic patients after gunshot wounds. Injury. 2009;40(8):860863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, Y, Cohn, SM, Soffer, D, et al. Spine injuries are common among asymptomatic patients after gunshot wounds. J Trauma. 2005;58(4):833836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanoix, R, Gupta, R, Leak, L, et al. C-spine injury associated with gunshot wounds to the head: retrospective study and literature review. J Trauma. 2000;49(5):860863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Committee on Trauma, American College of Surgeons. National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) Version 7.0; Chicago, Illinois USA: 2019. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/trauma/tqp/center-programs/ntdb/datasets. Accessed January 2020.Google Scholar
Kennedy, FR, Gonzalez, P, Beitler, A, et al. Incidence of cervical spine injury in patients with gunshot wounds to the head. Southern Med Journal. 1994;87(6):621623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chong, CL, Ware, DN, Harris, JH Jr. Is cervical spine imaging indicated in gunshot wounds to the cranium? J Trauma. 1998;44(3):501502.Google ScholarPubMed
Velopulos, CG, Shihab, HM, Lottenberg, L, et al. Prehospital spine immobilization/spinal motion restriction in penetrating trauma: a practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84(5):736744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medzon, R, Rothenhaus, T, Bono, CM, et al. Stability of cervical spine fractures after gunshot wounds to the head and neck. Spine. 2005;30(20):22742279.Google ScholarPubMed
Clark County EMS System Emergency Medical Care Protocols. June 1, 2017. www.southernnevadahealthdistrict.org/ems/documents/ems/medical-care-protocols.pdf. Accessed January 2020.Google Scholar