Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:31:36.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Agreement Between Paramedic-Estimated Weights and Subsequent Hospital Measurements in Adults with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Daniel R. Martin*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
David M. Soria
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Charles G. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Paul E. Pepe
Affiliation:
City of Houston Emergency Medical Services, Departments of Medicine, Surgery and Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
Edgar Gonzalez
Affiliation:
Section of Emergency Medical Services, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, Va.
Michael Jastremski
Affiliation:
Program in Multidisciplinary Critical Care, State University of New York Health Sciences Center at Syracuse, Syracuse, N.Y.
Harlan Stueven
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis.
Richard O. Cummins
Affiliation:
Emergency Medical Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
*
Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, 108 Means Hall, 1654 Upham Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA

Abstract

Objective:

To assess the accuracy of paramedic estimates of adult body weights in cardiac arrest cases.

Hypothesis:

Paramedics could accurately estimate the weights of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.

Design:

Retrospective data analysis of a 15-month, multicenter study involving nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Paramedic estimates of body weights were compared to weights measured in the hospital. Patients were included in the analysis only if both a paramedic weight and a measured in-hospital weight were recorded.

Setting:

Six urban emergency medical services systems.

Participants:

The study population included adults with return of spontaneous circulation who subsequently were admitted to the hospital.

Measurements:

Pearson correlation analysis of paramedic-estimated weights and measured weights.

Results:

Among the 133 study patients, the correlation coefficient (R) for paramedic estimates and the actual measured weight was 0.93. Paramedic estimates of weight were within 10% of the measured weights in 74% of the patients, and within 20% of measured weights in 93% of the patients.

Conclusion:

Paramedic weight estimates correlated well with measured weights.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. American Heart Association: Textbook of Advanced Cardiac Life Support. 2d ed. Dallas: American Heart Association, 1987, p 203.Google Scholar
2. Cummins, RO, Ornato, JP, Thies, WH et al. : Improving survival from sudden cardiac arrest: The “chain of survival concept.” Circulation 1991;83:18321847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Pepe, PE, Levine, RL, Fromm, RE et al. : Cardiac arrest patients presenting with asystole or ECG complexes without pulses: Contribution of resuscitation efforts toward survivorship. Crit Care Med (in press).Google Scholar
4. Roush, WR (ed): Principles of EMS Systems: A Comprehensive Text for Physicians. Dallas: American College of Emergency Physicians, 1989, pp 1228.Google Scholar
5. Brown, CG, Martin, DR, Pepe, PE et al. : A comparison of standard dose and high-dose epinephrine in cardiac arrest outside the hospital. N Engl J Med 1992;327:10511055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed