Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:40:41.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Survey Research in Disaster Public Health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Kimberley I. Shoaf  and
Corrinne Peek-Asa
Kimberley I. Shoaf*
Affiliation:
Center for Public Health and Disaster Relief, University of California-Los Angeles
Corrinne Peek-Asa
Affiliation:
Southern California Injury Prevention Research Center
*
*UCLA Center for Public Health and Disaster Relief, UCLA School of Public Health, Box 951772, Los Angeles, CA 90095–1772, USAEmail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

While much has been learned during the past three decades of research in the disaster field, there still are some major gaps in knowledge. The need for more and better research on the health aspects of disasters is especially noted. Often, research into the health aspects has been anecdotal in nature and suffers from poor documentation of human losses. However, there are valid research methodologies that can be adapted to better document losses, evaluate interventions, and set priorities for investments to reduce the burden on the health of the population caused by disasters.

Methods:

A number of data sources are used to demonstrate the potential uses of surveys in disaster health. The majority of the examples reflect data collected by telephone interviews following earthquakes in California.

Results:

By using comparable instruments, it is possible to track the changes in preparedness levels across time. Similarly, it is possible to compare injury rates or other health impacts across time, place, and disaster type. In addition, risk factors can be identified for health outcomes. For example, in the Northridge earthquake, those over age 60 years were three times more likely to be hospitalized or die as a result of injuries than were those aged 20–59 years. Interventions can be evaluated. Slightlyless than half of the respondents of the El Niño study had heard messages about preparing for the on-coming weather and their preparedness levels were not significantly different from those who had not heard about preparing for the weather.

Conclusion:

Surveys are useful tools for identifying and evaluating the health impacts of disasters.

Keywords

disastersearthquakesEl Niñoepidemiologyevaluationmethodologypublic healthsurveys
Type
Theoretical Discussion
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 65 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Drabek, TE: Following some dreams: Recognizing opportunities, posing interesting questions, and implementing alternative methods. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 1997;15:21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Health Disaster Management: Guidelines for evaluation and research in the Utstein style: Executive summary. Prebospital and Disaster Medicine 1999;14(2):43–52.Google Scholar
3.Bourque, LB, Clark, VA; Processing Data: The Survey Example. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc., 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Bourque, LB, Fielder, EP: How to Conduct Self-Administered and Mail Surveys. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc., 1995.Google Scholar
5.Aday, L: Designing and Conducting Health Surveys. 2nd ed.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1997:199.Google Scholar
6.Bourque, LB, Shoaf, KI, Nguyen, LH: Survey research. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 1997;15:71–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Turner, RH, Nigg, JM, Heller Paz, D: Waiting for Disaster: Earthquake Watch in California. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Peek-Asa, C, Kraus, JF, Bourque, LB, Vimalachandra, D, Yu, J, Adams, J: Fatal and hospitalized injuries resulting from the 1994 Northridge Earthquake. International Journal of Epidemiology 1998;27:459–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Russell, LA, Goltz, JD, Bourque, LB: Preparedness and hazard mitigation actions before and after two earthquakes. Environment and Behavior. 1995;27:744–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Shoaf, KI, Sareen, HR, Nguyen, LH, Bourque, LB: Injuries as a result of California earthquakes in the past decade. Disasters 1998;22:218–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Sareen, HR, Shoaf, KI: Use and difficulties associated with prescription medication and health aids after the 1994 Northridge Earthquake. (Presented at APHA Annual Conference, November 1998, Washington DC.)Google Scholar