Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:03:00.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychological First-Aid Training for Paraprofessionals: A Systems-Based Model for Enhancing Capacity of Rural Emergency Responses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2011

O. Lee McCabe ,
Charlene Perry ,
Melissa Azur ,
Henry G. Taylor ,
Mark Bailey  and
Jonathan M. Links
O. Lee McCabe*
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health and the Preparedness and Emergency Response Research Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland USA Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland USA
Charlene Perry
Affiliation:
Kent County Health Department, Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Chestertown, Maryland USA
Melissa Azur
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland USA
Henry G. Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Mark Bailey
Affiliation:
Office of Preparedness and Response, Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Baltimore, Maryland USA
Jonathan M. Links
Affiliation:
Preparedness and Emergency Response Research Center and the Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland USA
*
Correspondence: Dr. McCabe Hampton House624 N Broadway, Ste 390Baltimore, MD 21205 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction: Ensuring the capacity of the public health, emergency preparedness system to respond to disaster-related need for mental health services is a challenge, particularly in rural areas in which the supply of responders with relevant expertise rarely matches the surge of demand for services.

Problem: This investigation established and evaluated a systems-based partnership model for recruiting, training, and promoting official recognition of community residents as paraprofessional members of the Maryland Medical Professional Volunteer Corps. The partners were leaders of local health departments (LHDs), faith-based organizations (FBOs), and an academic health center (AHC).

Methods: A one-group, quasi-experimental research design, using both post-test only and pre-/post-test assessments, was used to determine the feasibility, effectiveness, and impact of the overall program and of a one-day workshop in Psychological First Aid (PFA) for Paraprofessionals. The training was applied to and evaluated for 178 citizens drawn from 120 Christian parishes in four local health jurisdictions in rural Maryland.

Results: Feasibility—The model was demonstrated to be practicable, as measured by specific criteria to quantify partner readiness, willingness, and ability to collaborate and accomplish project aims. Effectiveness—The majority (93–99%) of individual participants “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that, as a result of the intervention, they understood the conceptual content of PFA and were confident about (“perceived self-efficacy”) using PFA techniques with prospective disaster survivors. Impact—Following PFA training, 56 of the 178 (31.5%) participants submitted same-day applications to be paraprofessional responders in the Volunteer Corps. The formal acceptance of citizens who typically do not possess licensure in a health profession reflects a project-engendered policy change by the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.

Conclusions: These findings are consistent with the conclusion that it is feasible to consider LHDs, FBOs, and AHCs as partners to work effectively within the span of a six-month period to design, promote, conduct, and evaluate a model of capacity/capability building for public mental health emergency response based on a professional “extender” rationale. Moreover, consistently high levels of perceived self-efficacy as PFA responders can be achieved with lay members of the community who receive a specially-designed, one-day training program in crisis intervention and referral strategies for disaster survivors.

Keywords

at-risk populationsbehavioral health surgedisaster preparedness and responseparaprofessional response extenderspsychological first aidpublic health systems researchpublic/private collaborationrural emergency preparedness
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , August 2011 , pp. 251 - 258
Copyright
Copyright McCabe © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Holloway, HC, Norwood, AE, Fullerton, CS, et al: The threat of biological weapons: Prophylaxis and mitigation of psychological and social consequences. JAMA 1997;278:425–427.Google Scholar
Asukai, N: Mental health efforts following man-made toxic disasters: The Sarin attack and arsenic poisoning case. Presented at the 11th Congress of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Osaka, Japan, 1999.Google Scholar
North, CS, Nixon, SJ, Shariot, S, et al: Psychiatric disorders among survivors of the Oklahoma City bombing. JAMA 1999;288(8):755–762.Google Scholar
Boscarino, JA, Galea, S, Ahern, J, et al: Utilization of mental health services following the September 11th terrorist attacks in Manhattan, New York City. Int J Emerg Ment Health 2002;4:143–155.Google Scholar
Galea, S, Ahern, J, Resnick, H, et al: Psychological sequelae of the September 11 terrorist attacks in New York City. N Engl J Med 2002;346:982–987.Google Scholar
Schlenger, WE, Caddell, JM, Ebert, L, et al: Psychological reactions to terrorist attacks: Findings from the national study of Americans’ reactions to September 11. JAMA 2002;288:581–588.Google Scholar
McFarlane, AC: The phenomenology of posttraumatic stress disorders following a natural disaster. J Nerv Mental Dis 1988;176,1:22–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, BL, Jacob, D, Lindy, MC, et al: Chronic posttraumatic stress disorder and diagnostic co morbidity in a disaster sample. J Nerv Ment Dis 1992;180(12):760–766.Google Scholar
David, D, Mellman, TA, Lourdes, MM, Kullick-Bell, R, et al: Psychiatric morbidity following Hurricane Andrew. J of Traum Stress 1996;9(3):607–612.Google Scholar
Smith, EM, North, CS, McCool, RE, Shea, JM: Acute post-disaster psychiatric disorders: Identification of persons at risk. Amer J Psych 1990;147(2):202–206.Google Scholar
Lima, BR, Pai, S, Santacruz, H, Lozano, J: Psychiatric disorders among poor victims following a major disaster: Armero, Columbia. J Nerv Ment Dis 1991;179:420–427.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine: Preparing for the Psychological Consequences of Terrorism: A Public Health Strategy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Pole, N, Best, S, Metzler, T, Marmar, CR: Why are Hispanics at greater risk for PTSD? Cult Diversty Ethnic Min Psych 2005;11:144–161.Google Scholar
Balicer, RD, Omer, SB, Barnett, DJ, Everly, GS: Survey of local public health workers’ perceptions toward responding to an influenza pandemic. J Healthc Prot Manage 2006;22(2):1–14.Google Scholar
Smith, MH: American religious organizations in disaster: A study of congregational response to disaster. Mass Emergencies 1978;3:133–142.Google Scholar
Bradfield, C, Wylie, ML, Echterling, LG: After the flood: The response of ministers to natural disaster. Sociol Analy 1989;49:397–407.Google Scholar
Koenig, HG: In the Wake of Disaster: Religious Responses to Terrorism and Catastrophe. Phila: Templeton Foundation Press, 2006.Google Scholar
McCabe, OL, Lating, JM, Everly, GS, et al: Psychological first aid training for the faith community: A model curriculum. Int J Emerg Ment Health 2007;9(3):181–192.Google ScholarPubMed
McCabe, OL, Mosley, AM, Gwon, HS, et al: The tower of ivory meets the house of worship: Psychological first aid training for the faith community. Int J Emerg Ment Health 2007;9(3):171–180.Google Scholar
McCabe, OL, Mosley, A, Gwon, HS, Kaminsky, MJ: A disaster spiritual health corps: Training the faith community to respond to terrorism and catastrophe. In: Everly, GS, Mitchell, JT (Eds.), Integrative Crisis Intervention and Disaster Mental Health, Innovations in Disaster & Trauma Psychology, Vol 4, Ellicott City, MD: Chevron Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
Public Health Preparedness and Response Core Competency Development Project. Available at http://www.asph.org/documetn.cfm?page=1081. Accessed 20 June 2010.Google Scholar
Hobfall, SE, Watson, P, Bell, CC, et al: Five essential elements of immediate and mid-term mass trauma intervention: Empirical evidence. Psychiatry 2007;70(4):316–369.Google Scholar
Everly, GS: The Johns Hopkins Model of Psychological First Aid [RAPID; Appendix E]. Pastoral Crisis Intervention. Ellicott City, MD: Chevron Publishing Corporation, 2007.Google Scholar
McCabe, OL, Barnett, D, Taylor, HG, Links, JM: Ready, willing, and able: A framework for improving the public health emergency preparedness system. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 2010;4(2):161–168.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine: Research Priorities in Emergency Preparedness and Response for Public Health Systems: A Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Nelson, C, Lurie, N, Wasserman, J, Zakowski, S: Conceptualizing and defining public health emergency preparedness. Amer J Pub Health 2007;97(51)Supp 1: S9–S11.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Advancing the Nation’s Health: A Guide for Public Health Research Needs 2006–2015. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2007.Google Scholar
Cook, TD, Campbell, DT: Quasi-experimentation. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally College Publishing Co, 1979.Google Scholar
Campbell, DT, Stanley, JC: Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally & Co, 1966.Google Scholar
Bandura, A: Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman & Co, 1997.Google Scholar