Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:54:16.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prehospital Use of Aspirin Rarely Is Associated with Adverse Events

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Abstract

Introduction:

Aspirin is commonly administered for acute coronary syndromes in the prehospital setting. Few studies have addressed the incidence of adverse effects associated with prehospital administration of aspirin. Objective: To determine the incidence of adverse events following the administration of aspirin by prehospital personnel.

Methods:

Multi-center, retrospective, case series that involved all patients who received aspirin in the prehospital setting from (01 August 1999–31 January 2000). Patient encounter forms of the emergency medical services (EMS) of a metropolitan fire department were reviewed. All patients who had a potential cardiac syndrome (i.e., chest pain, dyspnea) as documented on the EMS forms were included in the review. Exclusion criteria included failure to meet inclusion criteria, and chest pain secondary to apparent noncardiac causes (i.e., trauma). Hospital charts were reviewed from a subset of patients at the participating hospitals. The major outcome was an adverse event following prehospital administration of aspirin. This outcome was evaluated during the EMS encounter, at emergency department discharge, or at six and 24-hours post-aspirin ingestion. An adverse event secondary to aspirin ingestion was defined as anaphylaxis or allergic reactions, such as rash or respiratory changes.

Results:

A total of 25,600 EMS encounter forms were reviewed, yielding 2,399 patients with a potential cardiac syndrome. Prior to EMS arrival, 585 patients had received aspirin, and 893 were administered aspirin by EMS personnel. No patients had an adverse event during the EMS encounter. Of these patients, 229 were transported to participating hospitals and 219 medical records were available for review with no adverse reactions recorded during their hospital course.

Conclusion:

Aspirin is rarely associated with adverse events when administered by prehospital personnel for presumed coronary syndromes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Lewis, HD Jr: Unstable angina: Status of aspirin and other forms of therapy. Circulation 1985;72(Suppl V):155160V.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Lewis, HD, Davis, JW, Archibald, DG, et al. : Protective effects of aspirin against acute myocardial infarction and death in men with unstable angina: Results of Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. N Engl J Med 1985;313:13691375.Google Scholar
3.Cairns, JA, Gent, M, Singer, J, et al. : Aspirin, sulfinpyrazone, or both, in unstable angina: Results of a Canadian multicentre clinical trial. N Engl J Med 1985;313:13691375.10.1056/NEJM198511283132201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Theroux, P, Ouimet, H, McCans, J, et al. : Aspirin, heparin, or both to treat acute unstable angina. N Engl J Med 1988;319:11051111.10.1056/NEJM198810273191701CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Theroux, P, Waters, D, Qui, S, et al. : Aspirin versus heparin to prevent myocardial infarction during the acute phase of unstable angina. Circulation 1993;88:20452048.10.1161/01.CIR.88.5.2045CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.The RISC Group: Risk of myocardial infarction and death during treatment with low-dose aspirin and intravenous heparin in men with unstable coronary artery disease. Lancet 1990;336:827830.10.1016/0140-6736(90)92336-GCrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.DeWood, MA, Spores, J, Rotske, R, et al. : Prevalence of total coronary occlusion during the early hours of transmural myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1980;303:897902.10.1056/NEJM198010163031601CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Hackett, D, Davies, G, Chierchia, S, Maseri, A: Intermittent coronary occlusion in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1987;317:10551059.10.1056/NEJM198710223171704CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group: Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1988;2:349360.Google Scholar
10.Abrishami, MA, Thomas, J: Aspirin intolerance—A review. Annals of Allergy 1977;39:2837.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Funk, D, Groat, C., Verdile, V: Education of paramedics regarding aspirin use. Prehosp Emerg Care 2000;4:6264.10.1080/10903120090941678CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Speer, F, Denison, T, Baptist J: Aspirin allergy. Annals of Allergy 1981;46:123126.Google ScholarPubMed
13.Speer, F: Aspirin allergy: A clinical study. South Med J 1975;68:314318.10.1097/00007611-197503000-00013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Kwoh, CK, Feinstein, AR: Rates of sensitivity reactions to aspirin: Problems in interpreting the data. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1986;40:494505.10.1038/clpt.1986.214CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Rogers, WJ, Bowlby, LJ, Chandra, NC, et al. :Treatment of myocardial infarction in the United States (1990 to 1993): Observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 1994;90:21032114.10.1161/01.CIR.90.4.2103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Cannon, CP, Henry, TD, Schweiger, MJ, et al. : Current management of ST elevation myocardial infarction and outcome of thrombolytic ineligible patients: Results of the multicenter TIMI 9 Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;(special issue):231A232A. Abstract.10.1016/0735-1097(95)92421-ZCrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Ellerbeck, EF, Jencks, SF, Radford, MJ, et al. : Quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: A four-state pilot study from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. JAMA 1995;273:15091514.10.1001/jama.1995.03520430045037CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Sharkey, SW, Brunette, DD, Ruiz, E, et al. :An analysis of time delays preceding thrombolysis for AMI. JAMA 1989;262:31713174.10.1001/jama.1989.03430220094037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Kennedy, JW, Weaver, WD: Potential use of thrombolytic therapy before hospitalization. Am J Cardiology 1989;64:8a11a.10.1016/0002-9149(89)90922-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Pressley, JC, Wilson, BH, Severance, HW Jr., et al. : Basic emergency medical care of patients with AMI: Initial pre-hospital characteristics and in-hospital complications. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984;4:487492.10.1016/S0735-1097(84)80091-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Schmidt, SB, Borsch, MA: The prehospital phase of AMI in the era of thrombolysis. Am J Cardiol 1990;65:14111415.10.1016/0002-9149(90)91345-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Gonzales, E, Jones, L, Ornado, J, et al. : Hospital delays and problems with thrombolytic administration in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy: A multicenter prospective assessment. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:12151221.10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81749-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI): Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1986;1:397401.Google Scholar