Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T03:22:31.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prehospital Emergency Care Training Practices Regarding Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Patients in Maryland (USA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2015

Sara Jalali ,
Matthew J. Levy  and
Nelson Tang
Sara Jalali
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland USA
Matthew J. Levy*
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland USA
Nelson Tang
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland USA
*
Correspondence: Matthew J. Levy, DO, MSc Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Department of Emergency Medicine 5801 Smith Ave Davis Building, Suite 200 Baltimore, Maryland 21209 USA E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

Prehospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers are expected to treat all patients the same, regardless of race, gender identity, sexual orientation, or religion. Some EMS personnel who are poorly trained in working with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) patients are at risk for managing such patients incompletely and possibly incorrectly. During emergency situations, such mistreatment has meant the difference between life and death.

Methods

An anonymous survey was electronically distributed to EMS educational program directors in Maryland (USA). The survey asked participants if their program included training cultural sensitivity, and if so, by what modalities. Specific questions then focused on information about LGBT education, as well as related topics, that they, as program directors, would want included in an online training module.

Results

A total of 20 programs met inclusion criteria for the study, and 16 (80%) of these programs completed the survey. All but one program (15, 94%) included cultural sensitivity training. One-third (6, 38%) of the programs reported already teaching LGBT-related issues specifically. Three-quarters of the programs that responded (12, 75%) were willing to include LGBT-related material into their curriculum. All programs (16, 100%) identified specific aspects of LGBT-related emergency health issues they would be interested in having included in an educational module.

Conclusion

Most EMS educational program directors in Maryland are receptive to including LGBT-specific education into their curricula. The information gathered in this survey may help guide the development of a short, self-contained, open-access module for EMS educational programs. Further research, on a broader scale and with greater geographic sampling, is needed to assess the practices of EMS educators on a national level.

JalaliS , LevyMJ , TangN . Prehospital Emergency Care Training Practices Regarding Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Patients in Maryland (USA). Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(2):1-4.

Keywords

educationEmergency Medical ServicesLGBT patientsprehospital
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 163 - 166
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. How Many People Are Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender? The Williams Institute Web site. http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Gates-How-Many-People-LGBT-Apr-2011.pdf. Accessed April 18, 2014.Google Scholar
2. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health Issues and Research Gaps and Opportunities. The Health of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People: Building a Foundation for Better Understanding. Washington DC, USA: National Academies Press (US); 2011. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK64806/. Accessed April 18, 2014.Google Scholar
3. Transgender terminology. University of California San Francisco Center of Excellence for Transgender Health Web site. http://transhealth.ucsf.edu/trans?page=protocol-terminology. Accessed April 18, 2014.Google Scholar
4. Makadon, HJ. Improving health care for the lesbian and gay communities. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(9):895-897.Google Scholar
5. Feinberg, L. Trans Liberation: Beyond Pink or Blue. Boston, Massachusetts USA: Beacon Press; 1998.Google Scholar
6. Eliason, MJ, Schope, R. Does “Don’t ask, don’t tell” apply to health care? Lesbian, gay, and bisexual people’s disclosure to health care providers. Journal of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association. 2001;5(4):125-134.Google Scholar
7. Kalbfleisch, NK, White, JC. “Gay and Lesbian Health Issues.” In: Bernstein E, Bernstein J, (eds). Case Studies in Emergency Medicine and the Health of the Public. Sudbury, Massachusetts USA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 1996.Google Scholar
8. Kenagy, GP. Transgender health: findings from two needs assessment studies in Philadelphia. Health Social Work. 2005;30(1):19-26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Parlee, MB. “Situated knowledge of personal embodiment: transgender activists’ and psychological theorists’ perspectives on ‘sex’ and ‘gender.’” In: Stam HJ, (ed). The Body and Psychology. Thousand Oaks, California USA: Sage; 1998: 120-140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Kelley, L, Chou, CL, Dibble, SL, et al. A critical intervention in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health: knowledge and attitude outcomes among second-year medical students. Teach Learn Med. 2008;20(3):248-253.Google Scholar
11. Sanchez, NF, Rabatin, J, Sanchez, JP, Hubbard, S, Kalet, A. Medical students’ ability to care for lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, and transgendered patients. Fam Med. 2006;38(1):21-27.Google Scholar
12. National Highway Transportation Safety Administration. National EMS Education Standards and Instructional Guidelines. http://www.ems.gov/EducationStandards.htm. Accessed April 18, 2014.Google Scholar
13. Maryland Institute For Emergency Medical Services Systems. Maryland EMS Board Approved Education Programs Offering EMS Training Leading to Licensure, Certification, or Renewal. http://www.miemss.org/home/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=wwSchKav0e0%3d&tabid=54. Accessed April 18, 2014.Google Scholar
14. US Department of Health and Human Services. The Affordable Healthcare Act. http://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/rights/law/index.html. Published March 23, 2010. Accessed April 18, 2014.Google Scholar